French cops arrest Belgian colleagues transporting migrants

[pts_m_h_2016]

Belgium is a classic example of why multi-ethnic countries do not work even under the most ideal conditions.

You mean your country Bangladesh is a much superior country to Belgium?

 

[Nilgiri]

You mean your country Bangladesh is a much superior country to Belgium?

And dont forget he is sitting in the UK and not of British ethnicity and shamelessly braying this lol.

His community has 70% poverty rate in UK (worst among all of the ethnic groups - double that of black british people for example), so they get quite desperate in trying to forget what they are through trying to bring down others in whichever way possible so they can have justification for being traitors and ingrates all through their history ( in the glorious cause of ethnic nationalism - till that gets shelved as well when convenient lol)

 

[UKBengali]

And dont forget he is sitting in the UK and not of British ethnicity and shamelessly braying this lol.

His community has 70% poverty rate in UK (worst among all of the ethnic groups - double that of black british people for example), so they get quite desperate in trying to forget what they are through trying to bring down others in whichever way possible so they can have justification for being traitors and ingrates all through their history ( in the glorious cause of ethnic nationalism - till that gets shelved as well when convenient lol)

Had to show the ignored content so I understood the context of your post.

Anything incorrect of what I stated? That Belgians of the two main ethnic groups hate each other is a fact.
This proves that even under the most benign conditions of being in the middle of prosperous and
peaceful EU, multi-ethnic states do not work.

 

[coffee_cup]

Had to show the ignored content so I understood the context of your post.

Anything incorrect of what I stated? That Belgians of the two main ethnic groups hate each other is a fact.
This proves that even under the most benign conditions of being in the middle of prosperous and
peaceful EU, multi-ethnic states do not work.

Ignore the Indian troll man.

Walons and Flemish Belgians hate each other and that is a fact. Have seen it myself.

 

[UKBengali]

Ignore the Indian troll man.

Walons and Flemish Belgians hate each other and that is a fact. Have seen it myself.

I do not take him seriously as you will see with the interactions I have
on this forum with him.

He needs to stop being butt-hurt when people state honest truths.

 

[Nilgiri]

Had to show the ignored content so I understood the context of your post.

Anything incorrect of what I stated? That Belgians of the two main ethnic groups hate each other is a fact.
This proves that even under the most benign conditions of being in the middle of prosperous and
peaceful EU, multi-ethnic states do not work.

Yes Switzerland is such a failed state too. They must aspire to be like BD and split up. Germans, French, Italians and Romanche...all must have their seperate independent country or just join with their parent countries (leaving the Romanche to their own devices).

Same goes for Italy....heck France has many "ethnicities" too if we are going by this description. I guess the frisians should also clamour to split away from the rest of the Dutch.....as should Scania from Sweden. Too many other examples of these failed "multi-ethnic" states in Europe indeed.

UK should also deport non-British ethnic people who do not believe in multi-ethnic states viability. Hypocrisy is a clear and present danger....especially when it stems from a member from a 70% poverty stricken community (and add to that a quite warped unreformed ideology that has created ghettos).

No legs to stand on, but he believes he is more firm than a grand oak....so funny.

 

[Mamluk]

And dont forget he is sitting in the UK and not of British ethnicity and shamelessly braying this lol.

His community has 70% poverty rate in UK (worst among all of the ethnic groups - double that of black british people for example), so they get quite desperate in trying to forget what they are through trying to bring down others in whichever way possible so they can have justification for being traitors and ingrates all through their history ( in the glorious cause of ethnic nationalism - till that gets shelved as well when convenient lol)

This guy keeps getting personal instead of discussing topic at hand.

@waz @WAJsal

 

[Nilgiri]

This guy keeps getting personal instead of discussing topic at hand.

@waz @WAJsal

I'm sorry who is bringing in multi-ethnic crap = failed country here?

Have you looked at what the banter was like in this thread before 2 dolts made it all serious about Belgium somehow being a failed country because it has two "ethnicities"?

Seriously someone who claims that there was an ethnic based genocide in his own homeland that prompted them to seperate quite bloodily form a previous religious based union.... talking about failed states in Europe (on same premise of ethnicity) is quite ridiculous. This is like magnitudes of difference here.

Walloons and Flemish have their differences, rivalries and even contempt in some instances....but it pales in comparison to anything found in underdeveloped South Asia....even within all the "pure" ethnic groups.

 

[UKBengali]

Yes Switzerland is such a failed state too. They must aspire to be like BD and split up. Germans, French, Italians and Romanche...all must have their seperate independent country or just join with their parent countries (leaving the Romanche to their own devices).

Same goes for Italy....heck France has many "ethnicities" too if we are going by this description. I guess the frisians should also clamour to split away from the rest of the Dutch.....as should Scania from Sweden. Too many other examples of these failed "multi-ethnic" states in Europe indeed.

UK should also deport non-British ethnic people who do not believe in multi-ethnic states viability. Hypocrisy is a clear and present danger....especially when it stems from a member from a 70% poverty stricken community (and add to that a quite warped unreformed ideology that has created ghettos).

No legs to stand on, but he believes he is more firm than a grand oak....so funny.

I had hoped that you would one day learn something lol

Switzerland is dominated by the ethnic Germans who
make up two-thirds of the population. The others are
in Switzerland for the ride.

Unless a country has a majority dominant group it is prone to paralysis and disintegration in the end.

PS - UK is fine as it is led by the white English ethnic group.

 

[Mamluk]

I'm sorry who is bringing in multi-ethnic crap = failed country here?

Have you looked at what the banter was like in this thread before 2 dolts made it all serious about Belgium somehow being a failed country because it has two "ethnicities"?

You are doing the same again. You can get your point through without calling them dolts.

And why do you get so worked up.. you're not Belgian are you?

 

[Nilgiri]

Switzerland is dominated by the ethnic Germans who
make up two-thirds of the population. The others are
in Switzerland for the ride.

So where does the magic number lie? At 60%? At 50%? Something else? What does your behind give you this particular day?

Everyone else along for the ride ...and a BD person in the UK is saying this.

You are doing the same again. You can get your point through without calling them dolts.

And why do you get so worked up.. you're not Belgian are you?

You can preach to all the much worse language used on this forum extensively if it hurts you for some reason....lets see if you have enough time and inclination for it.

How am I getting worked up? I am pointing out some blatant hypocrisy.

 

[waz]

Relax with the personal attacks please.

 

[UKBengali]

So where does the magic number lie? At 60%? At 50%? Something else? What does your behind give you this particular day?

Everyone else along for the ride ...and a BD person in the UK is saying this.

Butt-hurt is coming from the fact that you also are from a multi-ethnic state called India.
Unless a country has a dominant group that is a majority it stagnates and eventually disintegrates.
The more dominant the ethnic group is the more stable a state is. This is proven throughout
history.

You are doing the same again. You can get your point through without calling them dolts.

And why do you get so worked up.. you're not Belgian are you?

Who cares what this unemployed Indian calls someone

As can be clearly seen he has mental issues. Let him be and enjoy it.

 

[Penguin]

Belgium is a classic example of why multi-ethnic countries do not work even under the most ideal conditions.

Which ethnic groups are you talking about? The French and the Dutch? Belgium used to be part of the Netherlands through 1830. And all of the Netherlands used to be part of the Spanish and Frence empires....

----------
Historically, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (along with parts of Northern France and Western Germany) were known as the Low Countries; it once covered a somewhat larger area than the current Benelux group of states. The region was called Belgica in Latin, after the Roman province of Gallia Belgica. From the end of the Middle Ages until the 17th century, the area of Belgium was a prosperous and cosmopolitan centre of commerce and culture. From the 16th century until the Belgian Revolution in 1830, when Belgium seceded from the Netherlands, the area of Belgium served as the battleground between many European powers, causing it to be dubbed the "Battlefield of Europe," a reputation strengthened by both world wars.
-----------
With the armed support of revolutionary France, Dutch republicans proclaimed the Batavian Republic, modelled after the French Republic and rendering the Netherlands a unitary state on 19 January 1795. The stadtholder William V of Orange had fled to England. But from 1806 to 1810, the Kingdom of Holland was set up by Napoleon Bonaparte as a puppet kingdom governed by his brother Louis Bonaparte to control the Netherlands more effectively. However, King Louis Bonaparte tried to serve Dutch interests instead of his brother's, and he was forced to abdicate on 1 July 1810. The Emperor sent in an army and the Netherlands became part of the French Empire until the autumn of 1813, when Napoleon was defeated in the Battle of Leipzig. The south gained independence in 1830 as Belgium, while the personal union between Luxembourg and the Netherlands was severed in 1890, when William III died with no surviving male heirs. Ascendancy laws prevented his daughter Queen Wilhelmina from becoming the next Grand Duchess.
------------

• The name 'Belgium' is derived from Gallia Belgica, a Roman province in the northernmost part of Gaul that before Roman invasion in 100 BC, was inhabited by the Belgae, a mix of Celtic and Germanic peoples. A gradual immigration by Germanic Frankish tribes during the 5th century brought the area under the rule of the Merovingian kings. A gradual shift of power during the 8th century led the kingdom of the Franks to evolve into the Carolingian Empire.
• The Treaty of Verdun in 843 divided the region into Middle and West Francia and therefore into a set of more or less independent fiefdoms which, during the Middle Ages, were vassals either of the King of France or of the Holy Roman Emperor
• The Eighty Years' War (1568–1648) divided the Low Countries into the northern United Provinces (Belgica Foederata in Latin, the "Federated Netherlands") and the Southern Netherlands (Belgica Regia, the "Royal Netherlands"). The latter were ruled successively by the Spanish (Spanish Netherlands) and the Austrian Habsburgs (Austrian Netherlands) and comprised most of modern Belgium. This was the theatre of most Franco-Spanish and Franco-Austrian wars during the 17th and 18th centuries.
• Following the campaigns of 1794 in the French Revolutionary Wars, the Low Countries—including territories that were never nominally under Habsburg rule, such as the Prince-Bishopric of Liège—were annexed by the French First Republic, ending Austrian rule in the region. The reunification of the Low Countries as the United Kingdom of the Netherlands occurred at the dissolution of the First French Empire in 1815, after the defeat of Napoleon.
• In 1830, the Belgian Revolution led to the separation of the Southern Provinces from the Netherlands and to the establishment of a Catholic and bourgeois, officially French-speaking and neutral, independent Belgium under a provisional government and a national congress

The distribution of the primary Germanic dialect groups in Europe in around AD 1:

• Blue North Germanic
• Red North Sea Germanic, or Ingvaeonic
• Orange Weser-Rhine Germanic, or Istvaeonic
• Yellow Elbe Germanic, or Irminonic
• Green East Germanic

14th century

Netherlands Today

Belgium Today

Don't blab about that which you don't know.

 

[Nilgiri]

Which ethnic groups are you talking about? The French and the Dutch? Belgium used to be part of the Netherlands through 1830. And all of the Netherlands used to be part of the Spanish and Frence empires....

Historically, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (along with parts of Northern France and Western Germany) were known as the Low Countries; it once covered a somewhat larger area than the current Benelux group of states. The region was called Belgica in Latin, after the Roman province of Gallia Belgica. From the end of the Middle Ages until the 17th century, the area of Belgium was a prosperous and cosmopolitan centre of commerce and culture. From the 16th century until the Belgian Revolution in 1830, when Belgium seceded from the Netherlands, the area of Belgium served as the battleground between many European powers, causing it to be dubbed the "Battlefield of Europe," a reputation strengthened by both world wars.

With the armed support of revolutionary France, Dutch republicans proclaimed the Batavian Republic, modelled after the French Republic and rendering the Netherlands a unitary state on 19 January 1795. The stadtholder William V of Orange had fled to England. But from 1806 to 1810, the Kingdom of Holland was set up by Napoleon Bonaparte as a puppet kingdom governed by his brother Louis Bonaparte to control the Netherlands more effectively. However, King Louis Bonaparte tried to serve Dutch interests instead of his brother's, and he was forced to abdicate on 1 July 1810. The Emperor sent in an army and the Netherlands became part of the French Empire until the autumn of 1813, when Napoleon was defeated in the Battle of Leipzig. The south gained independence in 1830 as Belgium, while the personal union between Luxembourg and the Netherlands was severed in 1890, when William III died with no surviving male heirs. Ascendancy laws prevented his daughter Queen Wilhelmina from becoming the next Grand Duchess.

Don't blab about that which you don't know.

Belgium being a "new" country is referenced to in the new TV miniseries "Victoria" actually. A good series so far.

Its always funny when someone from a genuinely newer and much more unstable country (just have to look at the intra-ethnic hate fest in the BD subforum) blabs about a country almost 140 years older by current political existence.