What's new

France owns 14 African countries

and yet France still has no pensions and Paris looks like Bakhmut

I dont understand these Europeans steal so much from Africa why are they still so poor ?

The Rich poor divide in France is no better than most Asian countries.

I was going to look up their GINI coefficient when I had some time....
 
Yes, of course, they are just African skulls and bones, not of your grandpa or of any Europeans. Imagine it in a Turkish museum, then it wouldn't be so casual.
We already have stacks of skulls of our own people who died fighting the Turks. Or killed by the Turks.

But you,you're obsessed with skulls and bones. You're like a freemason or something. Novus Ordu Seclorum. Australian freemason.
 
We already have stacks of skulls of our own people who died fighting the Turks. Or killed by the Turks.

But you,you're obsessed with skulls and bones. You're like a freemason or something. Novus Ordu Seclorum. Australian freemason.
You get triggered when it comes to Turkey. Calm down man, they don't have skulls of Greeks or Europeans on display in a museum. World Order is not a constant. Thank God we are not living in the Ancient Greek Order. Draconian literally originates from Greece 😂.
 
You get triggered when it comes to Turkey. Calm down man, they don't have skulls of Greeks or Europeans on display in a museum. World Order is not a constant. Thank God we are not living in the Ancient Greek Order. Draconian literally originates from Greece 😂.
And you get triggered when it comes to France. Calm down man,they don't have skulls of Pakistanis to display.
 
And you get triggered when it comes to France. Calm down man,they don't have skulls of Pakistanis to display.
I would be equally repulsed by a museum of skull and bones as trophy if they belonged to Indian, Pakistani, Greek, French, Arab, Chinese, African, or any humans. I am at a higher level of morality than you.
 
Take a moment to think of that quote.
I did. You thought I would be triggered if those skulls were Pakistani, although I am not Pakistani ... nor African. Those skulls are African, so obviously, I have higher moral value than you when it comes to respect for humanity.
 
Yes, of course, they are just African skulls and bones, not of your grandpa or of any Europeans. Imagine it in a Turkish museum, then it wouldn't be so casual.

Don't bother with him... he is your fellow countryman... sitting in Greece obsessing on WHY, France is a topic on this forum... irony is lost on him... considering he is on a Pakistani forum. He demands or seeks relevance of himself and that of France in this discourse simultaneously.
 
Lay off the Greeks. They have to deepthroat the boots of the French. And perhaps the British. If the Greeks turn on their military backers, the French. The UK and partners would tell the Turks to invade the Greeks for complaining about their lot in life. The reason why Europe had these bad things happen to them is because Europe opposed Trump and the Trump plan to destroy China. Because the EU sought an independent policy from that of the US/UK, Europe was hit with a war and crisis. There would have been no invasion if the EU deepthroated the boots of Pompeo and Trump. If you go along with the UK/US agenda, you get treated like crap to be kept down as a slave, if you actively oppose and thwart their wars and hegemony, UK/US would try to destroy you in starting wars using their pawns and puppets. Armenia was hit with a war because it chose freedom of relative independence.

Greece is too small and in debt and next to a nation that can destroy it, exactly in the situation the UK/France want it to be. Dependent on France and unable to complain. This is why nukes are valuable. They are MAD and prevent wars. Greece should get nukes. Greece should have nukes before North Korea.

Greeks are completely clueless. Their Putin, the Russia Mob and Trump go back in partnership since the mid 1990s. Trump has recently told their Putin to get China to invade Taiwan so US would be focused on Taiwan and war with China (yes, the Chinese are dumb enough to fall for this), as Putin invades the EU. Therefore the imperialists kill two rivals - EU and China, with one stone.

For those that say the UK does not try to control the former British Empire:

The British-American coup that ended Australian independence​

This article is more than 8 years old
John Pilger


In 1975 prime minister Gough Whitlam, who has died this week, dared to try to assert his country’s autonomy. The CIA and MI6 made sure he paid the price
Thu 23 Oct 2014 13.50 BSTLast modified on Fri 14 Jul 2017 22.49 BST

Across the media and political establishment in Australia, a silence has descended on the memory of the great, reforming prime minister Gough Whitlam. His achievements are recognised, if grudgingly, his mistakes noted in false sorrow. But a critical reason for his extraordinary political demise will, they hope, be buried with him.
Australia briefly became an independent state during the Whitlam years, 1972-75. An American commentator wrote that no country had “reversed its posture in international affairs so totally without going through a domestic revolution”. Whitlam ended his nation’s colonial servility. He abolished royal patronage, moved Australia towards the Non-Aligned Movement, supported “zones of peace” and opposed nuclear weapons testing.


Although not regarded as on the left of the Labor party, Whitlam was a maverick social democrat of principle, pride and propriety. He believed that a foreign power should not control his country’s resources and dictate its economic and foreign policies. He proposed to “buy back the farm”. In drafting the first Aboriginal lands rights legislation, his government raised the ghost of the greatest land grab in human history, Britain’s colonisation of Australia, and the question of who owned the island-continent’s vast natural wealth.
Latin Americans will recognise the audacity and danger of this “breaking free” in a country whose establishment was welded to great, external power. Australians had served every British imperial adventure since the Boxer rebellion was crushed in China. In the 1960s, Australia pleaded to join the US in its invasion of Vietnam, then provided “black teams” to be run by the CIA. US diplomatic cables published last year by WikiLeaks disclose the names of leading figures in both main parties, including a future prime minister and foreign minister, as Washington’s informants during the Whitlam years.
Whitlam knew the risk he was taking. The day after his election, he ordered that his staff should not be “vetted or harassed” by the Australian security organisation, Asio – then, as now, tied to Anglo-American intelligence. When his ministers publicly condemned the US bombing of Vietnam as “corrupt and barbaric”, a CIA station officer in Saigon said: “We were told the Australians might as well be regarded as North Vietnamese collaborators.”
Whitlam demanded to know if and why the CIA was running a spy base at Pine Gap near Alice Springs, a giant vacuum cleaner which, as Edward Snowden revealed recently, allows the US to spy on everyone. “Try to screw us or bounce us,” the prime minister warned the US ambassador, “[and Pine Gap] will become a matter of contention”.

Victor Marchetti, the CIA officer who had helped set up Pine Gap, later told me, “This threat to close Pine Gap caused apoplexy in the White House … a kind of Chile [coup] was set in motion.”
Pine Gap’s top-secret messages were decoded by a CIA contractor, TRW. One of the decoders was Christopher Boyce, a young man troubled by the “deception and betrayal of an ally”. Boyce revealed that the CIA had infiltrated the Australian political and trade union elite and referred to the governor-general of Australia, Sir John Kerr, as “our man Kerr”.
Kerr was not only the Queen’s man, he had longstanding ties to Anglo-American intelligence. He was an enthusiastic member of the Australian Association for Cultural Freedom, described by Jonathan Kwitny of the Wall Street Journal in his book, The Crimes of Patriots, as “an elite, invitation-only group … exposed in Congress as being founded, funded and generally run by the CIA”. The CIA “paid for Kerr’s travel, built his prestige … Kerr continued to go to the CIA for money”.
When Whitlam was re-elected for a second term, in 1974, the White House sent Marshall Green to Canberra as ambassador. Green was an imperious, sinister figure who worked in the shadows of America’s “deep state”. Known as “the coupmaster”, he had played a central role in the 1965 coup against President Sukarno in Indonesia – which cost up to a million lives. One of his first speeches in Australia, to the Australian Institute of Directors, was described by an alarmed member of the audience as “an incitement to the country’s business leaders to rise against the government”.
The Americans and British worked together. In 1975, Whitlam discovered that Britain’s MI6 was operating against his government. “The Brits were actually decoding secret messages coming into my foreign affairs office,” he said later. One of his ministers, Clyde Cameron, told me, “We knew MI6 was bugging cabinet meetings for the Americans.” In the 1980s, senior CIA officers revealed that the “Whitlam problem” had been discussed “with urgency” by the CIA’s director, William Colby, and the head of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield. A deputy director of the CIA said: “Kerr did what he was told to do.”
On 10 November 1975, Whitlam was shown a top-secret telex message sourced to Theodore Shackley, the notorious head of the CIA’s East Asia division, who had helped run the coup against Salvador Allende in Chile two years earlier.
Shackley’s message was read to Whitlam. It said that the prime minister of Australia was a security risk in his own country. The day before, Kerr had visited the headquarters of the Defence Signals Directorate, Australia’s NSA, where he was briefed on the “security crisis”.
On 11 November – the day Whitlam was to inform parliament about the secret CIA presence in Australia – he was summoned by Kerr. Invoking archaic vice-regal “reserve powers”, Kerr sacked the democratically elected prime minister. The “Whitlam problem” was solved, and Australian politics never recovered, nor the nation its true independence.
 
Because blacks tried to rule their countries on their own and failed.

Do you know someone who barged into their neighbors house, fucked the wife; killed the children just because the neighbor can't seem to run his house properly?
Well people will fish if given opportunity. There is some truth to it.
Just like india took advantage of our situation in 1971.
 
Wow, France makes $500 billion a year from African countries it owns like personal property. However, there was decades of silence from useless organizations like African Union, Arab League, and OIC, which means corrupt African politicians must be benefiting from it.
 
yet now French is being conquered by Africans
 
Back
Top Bottom