What's new

FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER Government Opens Land, Housing In kashmir To Every Citizen Of India !!!!!!!

i will and you are welcome to visit us


TELEMMGLPICT000169578515_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqbTl4D02iCM3NuMfK2RT0HTjsyN2j3JnAYXPi059mk8g.jpeg

yep the tea is fantastic
This is like a rapist moving in your room and then squatting.
Indians thinking they can move in and kashmiris will get used to it and then they will dance together bollywood style and those chitta goriya kashmiris girls will be lining up for ajay devgan types who have killed so many pak soldiers in his imagination.
 
Last edited:
.
can I step in ? I own what you watch in movies and dream my boy . You must have heard mehnder district flash up on your country’s news stream recently .
I hope you find solace after all these losses.

 
.
Most Indians will not bother to settle in Kashmir even if security was not an issue. Only economic opportunities can convince an average person to migrate within India and Kashmir has very few opportunities to offer. Business owners were previously allowed to lease land for 99 years in Kashmir I think, but that was not enough to expand into the region. I doubt if owning the land would make a big difference.

Perhaps a few enthusiasts may move there for a limited time, but beyond that - this legal change does not have any significance.
 
.
India laying the Foundation for million years of continuous conflict, and continuous war.

Nuclear flash coming to the cinemas in the near future, no need to buy special glasses, they wont help.
And what if Nuclear fails too and nothing changes after a nuclear exchange only millions deaths. India has shown it can absorve 5-10 million deaths and still keep on going without bothering. Pandemic alone killed 5-10 millions in India. War will kill half a billion in India at maximum. Thats will still leave a billion alive. What will you do when even after spending ALL of your weapons and arms you are still not able to kill the enemy completely and it keeps on going?
Will Pakistan be ready to let all 250 million die even after killing 500 millions in India? Whats you end game in that case?
Most Indians will not bother to settle in Kashmir even if security was not an issue. Only economic opportunities can convince an average person to migrate within India and Kashmir has very few opportunities to offer. Business owners were previously allowed to lease land for 99 years in Kashmir I think, but that was not enough to expand into the region. I doubt if owning the land would make a big difference.

Perhaps a few enthusiasts may move there for a limited time, but beyond that - this legal change does not have any significance.
Most likely, Armed force personnels will be given land there.
 
.
If there is any attack on civilian, Army can level entire area. Fear works on both sides

No civilian wants to live like Ashraf Ghani in Afghanistan who can't leave a designated safe zone or they'll get shot in a warzone. (Modi will become the Mayor of Jammu)

The Indian military will end up like the US military in vietnam; except the Indians will inevitably end up being slaughtered in greater magnitudes.
 
.
Indian Bhutia. We are closely interrelated and often inter-marry; somewhat like how you lot marry your Afghan counterparts between Khyber and Afghanistan.

Your point being?

My lot? I am Han Chinese.

I was just curious because you had a Tibetan sounding handle.
 
.
Their part of Kashmir is also important for us, for strategic POV and due to many rivers flowing and such a beautiful place. Kashmiri will enhance their struggle and if all Indian Muslim support them, then India should forget Kashmir
Indian Muslims have nothing in common with Kashmiris. Ever seen them intermarrying? Before the change of 2019, they could not even settle there legally. Why will or should they support such people?
 
.
Most likely, Armed force personnels will be given land there.
This will likely happen only as long as Kashmir remains a UT. Armed forces personal are aware about the security problems in Kashmir, so they will think twice before moving their family to the province. In all likelihood, an average person will sell the land to a local and remain in his hometown.
 
.
India laying the Foundation for million years of continuous conflict, and continuous war.

Nuclear flash coming to the cinemas in the near future, no need to buy special glasses, they wont help.


All that is preposterous childish impotent frustration.
Even a five year old is not frightened by this futile posturing.
You had the opportunity when 360 was abrogated.
The time to strike was then if you had the balls, but sense prevailed in the Pakistani military hybrid govt.
They realised any full scale war would end Pakistan forever, with India suffering damage but putting and end once and for all to the noisy neighbour.
 
.
And what if Nuclear fails too and nothing changes after a nuclear exchange only millions deaths. India has shown it can absorve 5-10 million deaths and still keep on going without bothering. Pandemic alone killed 5-10 millions in India. War will kill half a billion in India at maximum. Thats will still leave a billion alive. What will you do when even after spending ALL of your weapons and arms you are still not able to kill the enemy completely and it keeps on going?
Will Pakistan be ready to let all 250 million die even after killing 500 millions in India? Whats you end game in that case?

Most likely, Armed force personnels will be given land there.

I honestly cannot tell if you are a child or a fully grown adult.
The number of assumptions you have made are truly astounding and ridiculous, and to top it all you write as if you can see the future, what a joker.

Where did you conjure up those idiotic figures?
Where has India shown it can absorb 5-10 million dead?
And is it 5-10 million or 500 million? Make up your mind.

How did you conclude how many will die? And how did you concluded that every single one of 250 million Pakistani will die? How?
Just because it is smaller, you do realise, that nuclear impact is not constrained in a box.

Do you even know the total impact of a nuclear war?
If you did, you would not be acting like a fool.

India cannot absorb jack sh.t, if it could, it would not have stopped after the balakot attack. It took one warning strike from Pakistan to stop India where it stood, and India has never been able to achieve head-on victory against Pakistan, your military knows far more then you.

If you think nuclear war is so easy, then some on son, let's go. I'm not particularly religious but I swear on God, Jinnah and my Nana that I will buy a ticket and wait in Pakistan.

Go read what impact nuclear war will have before they put you in an asylum.
Nuclear war has three prominent aspects,
1. The impact,
The number killed depends on the number of warheads and the location of impact, paradoxically this is the least damaging aspect of a nuclear war.

2. The immediate after effect,
This is the part where radiation continues to effect those still living, the destruction to the infrastructure, environment, agriculture, water supplies and so on, total elimination of governing structures, this will create the greatest damage, and it is hard to calculate, there are too many variables, and the total affected can number greater then the actual deaths in the initial explosion.

3. The long term effect,
a) This is where the country as it stands dissolves into nothingness, because of all the damage and deaths, destruction of agriculture and damage to water supplies, lack of funds, total destruction of urban centres, the urban centres house all of the governing capacity, and no funds because anything resembling a nation has collapsed, without an economy or agriculture, there is nothing left.

b) The effect on global agriculture, environment and water supplies from the nuclear cloud and nuclear rain. A fully localised full nuclear war would collapse the global economy, because of the amount of effort governments would have to take to mitigate any fallout. No one will be coming to help India or Pakistan, more like they will be cursing both the countries and trying hard to save their own people.

Leave your stupid Indian fantasies for other Indians, in the real world your thinking is stupendous beyond belief. But, ok, who gives a "F", no one on our side gives a "F", the choice is yours. That is the direction we are heading with continuous conflict, if you do not know, then you do now, and, I repeat, no one on this side gives flying "F" about your fantasy conclusions.


 
.
All that is preposterous childish impotent frustration.
Even a five year old is not frightened by this futile posturing.
You had the opportunity when 360 was abrogated.
The time to strike was then if you had the balls, but sense prevailed in the Pakistani military hybrid govt.
They realised any full scale war would end Pakistan forever, with India suffering damage but putting and end once and for all to the noisy neighbour.

Read my other reply you fool.

Why are you Indians so full of assumptions?
And you, you are ashamed of being an Indian, and here you are trying hardest to be one, in the other post you told me you are not Indian but East African, what are you doing here fighting in India's corner?
Does it feel good being a hypocrite?

And where did you pick up a threat? hope you are not turning senile in your old age? Please don't behave like an idiot, its unbecoming at your age.

My statement was simple and clear, and factual.
Did I threaten anyone? NO
Did I make any actionable claims? NO

So why are you getting your panties in a twist? or have they started you on your nappies again?

It is the Indian government that wants war you fool, but can't do "F" all, crying about Pakistani controlled Kashmir for 74 years, nothing but stupid whinging and crying, because they and you cannot do anything.
If Pakistan wanted war, Pakistan could have whopped your backside back in 1962, when China was all inside you and your India, so keep your head on old man, its going to fall off anytime soon anyhow, so lets keep it together for the time being.
 
.
I honestly cannot tell if you are a child or a fully grown adult.
The number of assumptions you have made are truly astounding and ridiculous, and to top it all you write as if you can see the future, what a joker.
A person making a ad-hominem right off the bat! Lets ask you, if you are a child, an adult or an imbecile?

Where did you conjure up those idiotic figures?
Where has India shown it can absorb 5-10 million dead?
And is it 5-10 million or 500 million? Make up your mind.

How did you conclude how many will die? And how did you concluded that every single one of 250 million Pakistani will die? How?
Just because it is smaller, you do realise, that nuclear impact is not constrained in a box.

Do you even know the total impact of a nuclear war?
If you did, you would not be acting like a fool.

India cannot absorb jack sh.t, if it could, it would not have stopped after the balakot attack. It took one warning strike from Pakistan to stop India where it stood, and India has never been able to achieve head-on victory against Pakistan, your military knows far more then you.

If you think nuclear war is so easy, then some on son, let's go. I'm not particularly religious but I swear on God, Jinnah and my Nana that I will buy a ticket and wait in Pakistan.

Go read what impact nuclear war will have before they put you in an asylum.
Nuclear war has three prominent aspects,
1. The impact,
The number killed depends on the number of warheads and the location of impact, paradoxically this is the least damaging aspect of a nuclear war.

2. The immediate after effect,
This is the part where radiation continues to effect those still living, the destruction to the infrastructure, environment, agriculture, water supplies and so on, total elimination of governing structures, this will create the greatest damage, and it is hard to calculate, there are too many variables, and the total affected can number greater then the actual deaths in the initial explosion.

3. The long term effect,
a) This is where the country as it stands dissolves into nothingness, because of all the damage and deaths, destruction of agriculture and damage to water supplies, lack of funds, total destruction of urban centres, the urban centres house all of the governing capacity, and no funds because anything resembling a nation has collapsed, without an economy or agriculture, there is nothing left.

b) The effect on global agriculture, environment and water supplies from the nuclear cloud and nuclear rain. A fully localised full nuclear war would collapse the global economy, because of the amount of effort governments would have to take to mitigate any fallout. No one will be coming to help India or Pakistan, more like they will be cursing both the countries and trying hard to save their own people.

Leave your stupid Indian fantasies for other Indians, in the real world your thinking is stupendous beyond belief. But, ok, who gives a "F", no one on our side gives a "F", the choice is yours. That is the direction we are heading with continuous conflict, if you do not know, then you do now, and, I repeat, no one on this side gives flying "F" about your fantasy conclusions.
India just had a MASSIVE wave with 5 million dead. Coming wave will kill another 2-3 million. That did not put it through any kind of political crisis. So it begs this question : What if nuclear weapons did not prove to be enough? What is your plan then?
And what if India decides to retaliate and exact revenge to nuclear war?

When you say "Nuclear" "Nuclear" "Nuclear" day and night, you should be able to answer this. So answer this first : What if nuclear weapons did not do anything to stop the war at ALL and Indians still kept on coming and attacking and killing you and Kashmiri, what will you do then?
Read my other reply you fool.

Why are you Indians so full of assumptions?
And you, you are ashamed of being an Indian, and here you are trying hardest to be one, in the other post you told me you are not Indian but East African, what are you doing here fighting in India's corner?
Does it feel good being a hypocrite?

And where did you pick up a threat? hope you are not turning senile in your old age? Please don't behave like an idiot, its unbecoming at your age.

My statement was simple and clear, and factual.
Did I threaten anyone? NO
Did I make any actionable claims? NO

So why are you getting your panties in a twist? or have they started you on your nappies again?

It is the Indian government that wants war you fool, but can't do "F" all, crying about Pakistani controlled Kashmir for 74 years, nothing but stupid whinging and crying, because they and you cannot do anything.
If Pakistan wanted war, Pakistan could have whopped your backside back in 1962, when China was all inside you and your India, so keep your head on old man, its going to fall off anytime soon anyhow, so lets keep it together for the time being.
Lets face it: If we wanted we could conquer the moon is a stupid argument. You did what you could. If you could you would have pressed attack in 2019 itself when India unsuccessfully attacked Pakistan. You could not. You could not even keep the attacker --no matter how much of a untrained one-- for more than 24 hours. You only did diplomatic screaming after India basically swallowed your Kashmir and put Kashmiri through a nightmare and devil knows what it will do next. With this kind of acts, how do you want any one --including Kashmiris-- to take you seriously?
 
Last edited:
.
A person making a ad-hominem right off the bat! Lets ask you, if you are a child, an adult or an imbecile?


India just had a MASSIVE wave with 5 million dead. Coming wave will kill another 2-3 million. That did not put it through any kind of political crisis. So it begs this question : What if nuclear weapons did not prove to be enough? What is your plan then?
And what if India decides to retaliate and exact revenge to nuclear war?

When you say "Nuclear" "Nuclear" "Nuclear" day and night, you should be able to answer this. So answer this first : What if nuclear weapons did not do anything to stop the war at ALL and Indians still kept on coming and attacking and killing you and Kashmiri, what will you do then?

I did not attack you, fool.
I gave you a detailed answer, a qualified reply to your stupid statement, calling out a person for their stupidity is not an attack, but a recognition of reality.

Rather then provide relevant valid reply, you're repeating the same stupid rubbish that makes no sense.
Are you seriously a child or a stupid adult?

Read what I told you again, nuclear war explosion isn't contained in a box, it's not like 500 million will drop where they stand, and the rest will get on with their lives, you need a brain to have a discussion, please get one.
 
.
I did not attack you, fool.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Self-contradiction is an art that you have mastered.

I gave you a detailed answer, a qualified reply to your stupid statement, calling out a person for their stupidity is not an attack, but a recognition of reality.

Rather then provide relevant valid reply, you're repeating the same stupid rubbish that makes no sense.
Are you seriously a child or a stupid adult?

Read what I told you again, nuclear war explosion isn't contained in a box, it's not like 500 million will drop where they stand, and the rest will get on with their lives, you need a brain to have a discussion, please get one.
The question is this much : What will Pakistan do if even hitting India with 200/300 nuclear bombs did not stop them from attacking Pakistan and Kashmir and you are out of bombs and all weapons? Whats next?

Remember, Pakistan nuclear weapons were for one and one purpose only : So that India cannot use its conventional might to overwhelm Pakistan. They were never meant to be weapons for decapitation but that of deterrence. Once you use them, there is no deterrence left.
 
.
My lot? I am Han Chinese.

I was just curious because you had a Tibetan sounding handle.

Sorry my bad. I saw another set of flags while replying to your answer. :)

You identified correctly. Tshering is my name and hence the handle name. It is a common name shared between us and the Tibetans and even Bhutanese. But we have some minute distinctions in our day to day lives.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom