What's new

For Pakistan members IN PAKISTAN only. 9/11 again

Were the U.S. 9/11 attacks perpetrated by terrorists?

  • Yes, the attacks were done by terrorists.

    Votes: 23 36.5%
  • No, the CIA, MOSSAD, or US government caused it so the US could go to war.uted the attacks

    Votes: 40 63.5%

  • Total voters
    63
I understand this, I'm simply curious to get a feel for those active Pakistani members and their beliefs.

The biggest conspiracy theorists are those who always come up with claims of "Majority Pakistanis believe this and that"


so never mind. whatever 9/11 was and is ask your intelligence set up your pentagon policy makers, we only know that it became a big excuse for killing of innocent people around the world by US and Co
 
Right now, it is about 2:1 conspiracy:terrorists. I haven't been able to read through it as I have to rush off to work. I will do so as soon as I return in a couple of days. Thanks to all who participated. :)
 
Right now, it is about 2:1 conspiracy:terrorists. I haven't been able to read through it as I have to rush off to work. I will do so as soon as I return in a couple of days. Thanks to all who participated. :)

:lol: ask admins for names of those members who have voted to see the nationalities as i dont see the results are showing it.
 
One thing for sure is that there was no plane wrekage found at the Pentagon Site.
 
No WMD found in Iraq...
Bush.. was going to invade Iraq NO MATTER WHAT.
So this 9/11 or the WMD subject wont change anything.
They would invade anyway.
 
OK, it's 70% Conspiracy right now. To those who voted but were not qualified to vote, I wish you hadn't, it slews the results and also shows discourtesy. To Pakistani members living in Pakistan who did vote, you have my thanks.

I do need to clarify some things.

The reason I asked for the poll was that despite what some people have said, to Americans, at least, 9/11 is NOT ancient history or meaningless... it defines the current conflict for us. We wouldn't be in Afghanistan if 9/11 had not taken place. Given that, the attacks themselves, and the world perception on the origins of the attack, are very important.

The results surely will disappoint you

Yes, they do, if they are accurate.
 
Question is
Had 9/11 been carried out by people living in some wasteland with no recourses.. no strategic value whatsoever...
would the poll have showed similar results??
 
OK, it's 70% Conspiracy right now. To those who voted but were not qualified to vote, I wish you hadn't, it slews the results and also shows discourtesy. To Pakistani members living in Pakistan who did vote, you have my thanks.

I do need to clarify some things.

The reason I asked for the poll was that despite what some people have said, to Americans, at least, 9/11 is NOT ancient history or meaningless... it defines the current conflict for us. We wouldn't be in Afghanistan if 9/11 had not taken place. Given that, the attacks themselves, and the world perception on the origins of the attack, are very important.



Yes, they do, if they are accurate.

What you have achieved by being in Afghanistan as invaders ? other than killing more people creating more hatred for Americans in general (which is sad ) bringing more destruction and now at the end you are in talks with Taliban.

woudnt it be more appropriate to use brain in the start
 
What you have achieved by being in Afghanistan as invaders ? other than killing more people creating more hatred for Americans in general (which is sad ) bringing more destruction and now at the end you are in talks with Taliban.

This isn't the thread to discuss it, but after 9/11, we wanted to kill those responsible. It's no more complicated than that. Where the strategy failed is in the "nation building" phase which I despise. The better solution would have been to utterly gut Taliban/Al-Quaeda C & C, camps, kill/capture as many leaders as possible. After ~ 6 months, exit. Leave behind a thousand leaflets that say "If you ever export another attack on our interests, we will be back and do this again." The same thing should have been done to Iraq, a war which I totally disagreed with then, and now, but once launched, with tanks in Bagdhad and Saddam running like a rabbit, do the same thing.


woudnt it be more appropriate to use brain in the start

I've asked this question many times - "If your nation suffered an attack of the sort that was 9/11, what would you want your leadership and military to do?" What should we have done? Whined about it at the U.N.? No self-respecting country would sit on their hands after such an assault. The failure occurred after the initial battlefield victories.
 
I've asked this question many times - "If your nation suffered an attack of the sort that was 9/11, what would you want your leadership and military to do?" What should we have done? Whined about it at the U.N.? No self-respecting country would sit on their hands after such an assault. The failure occurred after the initial battlefield victories.

A very very important question? whoever bashing them for Afgan episode should answer this?
 
@chogy sir

taliban agreed to hand over osama to a third country

and they asked for proof that he is the one behind the attack ?
but the americans didn't agree to do so..why ?
you could have avoided a was..though the taliban were worst people.
 
1/3rd of the votes are probably corrupted by members who were looking for 'epic lulz'
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom