Five Indian Soldiers killed on LOC

[Shiroyama]

You haven't replied where does it say, the soldier was killed on LOC.

There's a hell of difference between 4500 and your claim of 144.....
If it was false, the newspapers would have retracted their story and numbers, the fact is even more sources are carrying this story to expose the Indian losses and lies.

Why would newspaper bother about retracting a story or not.
The fact is 144 number is official 674 is just misconstrued.

Not on the LOC!

My brother is from Eng Corps and spent years in FATA.

Fanboy twitter accounts are hardly reliable, posting random stuff for likes. Witout verification or mention on details on their own time..

Engineers are the only units deployed on the LoC for mining and demining.
Both deploy them on LoC.

https://twitter.com/x/status/870905704571424768

 

[Windjammer]

Why would newspaper bother about retracting a story or not.
The fact is 144 number is official 674 is just misconstrued.

Oh so Indian newspapers print and publish whatever they want.....but they become very credible for you when they publish news about Pakistan, it clearly gives reference of IA as source.

 

[Shiroyama]

Oh so Indian newspapers print and publish whatever they want.....but they become very credible for you when they publish news about Pakistan, it clearly gives reference of IA as source.

IA was never the source, a random RTI activist claimed IA have that number without him ever showing documents.

 

[Windjammer]

https://twitter.com/x/status/870967677816160258

IA was never the source, a random RTI activist claimed IA have that number without him ever showing documents.

Over 4,500 soldiers killed along LoC in Pak firing since 2001: Army

 

[Shiroyama]

https://twitter.com/x/status/870967677816160258

Over 4,500 soldiers killed along LoC in Pak firing since 2001: Army

That's jus quoting ISPR.

As for second part:

Said Vadodara based RTI activist Pankaj Darve

 

[Areesh]

Your ISPR hides a lot.
Names like Naveed, Waris shah expose that.

Names are random names with no credibility.

Come back and bring something credible.

 

[Windjammer]

That's jus quoting ISPR.

As for second part:

You can twist the story to satisfy your tiny ego, the fact is the news is there for all to read.
And since you are using random tweets to prove your worth, well every loss shouldn't be linked with LOC.
Fighting and casualties happen elsewhere as well.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/615555/one-security-man-killed-maoists.html

 

[Shiroyama]

You can twist the story to satisfy your tiny ego, the fact is the news is there for all to read.
And since you are using random tweets to prove your worth, well every loss shouldn't be linked with LOC.
Fighting and casualties happen elsewhere as well.

Only onetwisting facts is you.

Names are random names with no credibility.

Come back and bring something credible.

From opaque countries like Russia & Pakistan which hide their casualties social media accounts ae a reliable method to gauge casualties:

Today, however, relatives often mourn their dead on social media, as in the case of Kostenko, making it harder for Moscow to conceal the casualties.

"Increasingly, it's the living that give voices to the dead," Galeotti said.

 

[Areesh]

From opaque countries like Russia & Pakistan which hide their casualties social media accounts ae a reliable method to gauge casualties:

Irrelevant BS. Not related to topic and can't prove random tweets to be correct.

 

[Shiroyama]

Irrelevant BS. Not related to topic and can't prove random tweets to be correct.

Neither can you prove them to be false.

 

[Windjammer]

Only onetwisting facts is you.

If you had an ounce of credibility and shame, you wouldn't need to survive with fake IDs.

 

[Dazzler]

https://twitter.com/x/status/869462139131625472

https://twitter.com/x/status/869565817079435264

What nonsense. So now they posted engineering Corp on the LOC to fight your goons. A classic case of prooaganda. pick a photo of anyone in the uniform and post it as a casualty.

Absurd.

 

[Areesh]

Neither can you prove them to be false.

Something that is false and has no credibility is already false. Noting more is needed to prove it anything.

 

[Shiroyama]

Something that is false and has no credibility is already false. Noting more is needed to prove it anything.

Denying the truth is not going to make it false.
Nothing more is needed.

 

[Shiji]

Denying the truth is not going to make it false.
Nothing more is needed.

You state that only Engr Bn are deployed on the LoC, is that correct?