What's new

First World War - Finding Pakistan's place in history.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Islam is very young . 1400 years is nothing .
IVC was and is hindu civilization . Only a bigot oxymoron would call Hinduism and buddhism paganism .
Nothing is your heritage . Either lay claim on your culture or religion . Not on both . Its stupid beyond comprehension .


Cherokee bhai,

perhaps there is an issue of perception on both sides.

Granted that Rig Veda mentions Indus river 30 times while Ganga only twice.

But later vedic literature speaks of northern Punjab, Sindh and eastern Rajasthan as the land of Malechas. And guess what, all these areas are part of Indus valley.

So the bottom line is simple!, there were no large scale population of Hindus in Indus Valley compared to Ganga Valley.

Ganga Valley for Hinduism

Indus valley for those who did not follow Hinduism. hence no mega-mundir on Indus river system. just the small ones.


peace
 
. .
Shouldnt you be shamed of this heritage because thats the reason why you left it and move to some other race, civilization, religion.

What kind of shame? - Are Egyptians or Iraqis or Iranians ashamed of their pagan past? - Hell no. Hinduism had failed our people and their aspirations, therefore we eradicated it and replaced it with a new system which distributed equity among us and made us all equals.
 
.
Both of them are ours. Buy yourself some peanuts :D


Hahahah . This is the reason of present condition of Pakistan . Neither 'muricans claim the glory of british empire of their own nor turks :D . Its just Pakistan .
 
.
IVC was not a Hindu civilization, they followed another extinct form of paganism including Buddhism.
please update your knowledge indus valley died in some 1200 BC and buddhism came during 600 BC that's fcking 600 year gap you are talking about.
 
. . .
Hahahah . This is the reason of present condition of Pakistan . Neither 'muricans claim the glory of british empire of their own nor turks :D . Its just Pakistan .

Absurd comparison. None of those empires were built in shared beliefs but on economic interest.
 
.
That is a wrong accusation. I have nothing against muhajirs.
Everyone could become a Pakistani. But you should not deny your heritage. And people who became Pakistanis should have respect for native Pakistanis.

The so called native Pakistanis also became Pakistanis along with the people across India who fought for it. The Natives deserve no special treatment in this regard.
 
. . .
Cherokee bhai,

perhaps there is an issue of perception on both sides.

Granted that Rig Veda mentions Indus river 30 times while Ganga only twice.

But later vedic literature speaks of northern Punjab, Sindh and eastern Rajasthan as the land of Malechas. And guess what, all these areas are part of Indus valley.

So the bottom line is simple!, there were no large scale population of Hindus in Indus Valley compared to Ganga Valley.


peace

Please elaborate how a single points of yours is related to mine . Thanks in advance .
 
.
The so called native Pakistanis also became Pakistanis along with the people across India who fought for it. The Natives deserve no special treatment in this regard.

Fought?

like war?
 
.
please update your knowledge indus valley died in some 1200 BC and buddhism came during 600 BC that's fcking 600 year gap you are talking about.

Wow wow wow - the Buddha statues we have excavated must have been placed there by some jin bhoots.
 
.
Absurd comparison. None of those empires were built in shared beliefs but on economic interest.

Neither was muslim empire ( if there was any). Please get off your high horse .
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom