What's new

[Fight For Future] Su-35S vs F-15X

But its a Upgraded form of original Su-27 with new avionics/radar and that all Just like F-16 A/B evolved into F-16 Block-52 with new avionics/radar @undertakerwwefan :agree:

Not just new electronics but also new airframe. Su-35 compared to Su-27 is like Mirage 2000 compared to Mirage III and F-18E compared to F-18A/C.

AFAIK, F-16 never got a new airframe design like Flanker, Mirage, F-18 did.
 
Not just new electronics but also new airframe. Su-35 compared to Su-27 is like Mirage 2000 compared to Mirage III and F-18E compared to F-18A/C.

AFAIK, F-16 never got a new airframe design like Flanker, Mirage, F-18 did.
Na there is no significant changes in air-fame design with a exception of using composite material (RAM) and TVC plan form remains same as old Su-27M had @undertakerwwefan :disagree:
 
Na there is no significant changes in air-fame design with a exception of using composite material (RAM) and TVC plan form remains same as old Su-27M had @undertakerwwefan :disagree:

There is a lot of change to air frame. Larger radome for bigger radar. Larger intakes for more powerful engines. F-16 never had change to airframe.

BTW, Lavi in the 1980s was designed with CAD. Before 1980s, no CAD.

 
There is a lot of change to air frame. Larger radome for bigger radar. Larger intakes for more powerful engines. F-16 never had change to airframe.

BTW, Lavi in the 1980s was designed with CAD. Before 1980s, no CAD.

:disagree: Same air frame length as old Su-27 72 feet which mean similar radome, maybe more internal volume inside the radome, but radome is similar to old Si-27 because dimensions are similar to old Su-27 @undertakerwwefan

as for F-16 you're also wrong, F-16 A/B using P & W F-100 with a thrust of 22,000 lbs but in F-16 block-52 is using a upgraded version of P & W F-100 called P & W F220 with a thrust of 29,000 lbs therefore larger intakes @undertakerwwefan :p::enjoy:
 
:disagree: Same air frame length as old Su-27 72 feet which mean similar radome, maybe more internal volume inside the radome, but radome is similar to old Si-27 because dimensions are similar to old Su-27 @undertakerwwefan

as for F-16 you're also wrong, F-16 A/B using P & W F-100 with a thrust of 22,000 lbs but in F-16 block-52 is using a upgraded version of P & W F-100 called P & W F220 with a thrust of 29,000 lbs @undertakerwwefan :p::enjoy:

Nope. Su-35 airframe completely different from Su-27 airframe. Not only shape but also material.
 
True, like Mirage 2000 is an upgraded Mirage and F-18E is an upgraded Hornet.
Super hornet is differ in F-18 because F-18 has rounded air intakes whereas superhornet has square intake and in Mirage-3 and Mirage-2000 there is a difference, not show me what is the difference in between Su-27/Su-35 airframe @undertakerwwefan
 
Super hornet is differ in F-18 because F-18 has rounded air intakes whereas superhornet has square intake and in Mirage-3 and Mirage-2000 there is a difference, not show me what is the difference in between Su-27/Su-35 airframe @undertakerwwefan

main-qimg-264fd3615e3f8808ffe1cc2bb400a66f


main-qimg-ad61670bc21d4f80630f636e7857ed56


main-qimg-c86461b4e806c14cac1cdef02c0d57ed


It's explained here.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-easiest-way-to-differentiate-between-Su-27-and-Su-35S
 
i say just one word minimal changes to airframe as compare to other jets upgraditon/modernization @undertakerwwefan

Main thisnk to upgrade Su-27 avionics to become Su-35 @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:

Minimal or not minimal is irrelevant. Su-35 airframe has lots of composite and RAM, a fraction of the RCS of Su-27. Su-35 replaces Su-27 like Mirage 2000 replaces Mirage III and F-18E replaces F-18C.
 

Back
Top Bottom