Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
Nishan, please be more specific, what are you referring to? A text, a link, a picture?I think its Korean design one...
Although I wish Pakistan would start up JV with China on:
700 Tons
1600 Tons
3500 Tons
7000 Tons
I don't think he means NORTH Korean (rather the SOUTH Korean minisub indicated above (KSM 500A)Please show us a similar Nkorean submarine
Well, the rest of the world pretty much categorizes warship that way. If you choose that approach then 'warship' rather than 'destroyer' would be best used to refer to Alvand/Moudge ships. Unless willing to use adjectives, one common term for all warships really isn't informative, even confusing in discussions about naval issues. At least use the name of the lead ship to indicate the class and avoid the whole 'what kind of ship is it?' discussion.well there is no direct word for those class of ships , you must make the word by combining ship and boat with appropriate adjective and adverbs and get the words like "قایق گشتزنی - Patrol Boat" or "ناو جنگی - Nave-Jangi or Combat ship" and "کشتی اقیانوس پیما - Ocean Going Ship"
honestly its easier and more elegant to sum all of them together. unles they invent some word for those class of ships and even if they do that it take years for people to accept those word .
let put it like it people accept some word and don't accept some other , here everyone knew the new word for Helicopter is بالگرد - Bal-Gard but hardly anybody knew the accepted word for Pizza is کش لقمه - kesh-loghmeh
Last edited: