M. Sarmad
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
The Council of Ideology is a government appointed non-entity whose recommendations the government itself doesn't follow, whom the liberals slag off for whatever views it has presented, and whom the conservatives do not trust.
The Egyptian university Al-Azhar is considered authentic by the likes of American politicians. Amongst true Muslims, it has lost its credibility because of leaning too much towards worldliness and materialistic gains.
There is a huge difference between a 'prominent figure', and an 'authentic figure'. From Wikipedia, it becomes clear that he was a prominently controversial figure, whose views were rejected by his contemporaries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Nasiruddin_al-Albani
So, you are trying to spread misinformation based on the rejected views of a controversial figure. Definitely a Rafadhi ploy, if ever there was one.
Again, you are entitled to your own opinion (but of course not to your own facts)
You are free to reject Al-Azhar, Council of Islamic ideology, Albani, Zakir Nayak and anyone else you want.
But accusing them all of deliberately propagating Rawafidh views and misleading Muslim masses only makes you look like an idiot.