What's new

Featured F-16.net confirms Su-30MKI loss on 27th Feb

Interesting that the website states that the Sukhoi was hit but does not go further than that. However for Wing Commander Noman's kill the website explicitly states that the aircraft was downed after the missile impact since we have the wreckage. Only goes to show it's a very professionally managed website.
It does not say anything like a sukhoi being hit.
Its been removed . No mention of su at all.
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-16/airframe-profile/1223/
F16 net has a administrator known as Asif... Do the maths. He was probably being patriotic.
 
. . .
It does not say anything like a sukhoi being hit.
Its been removed . No mention of su at all.
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-16/airframe-profile/1223/
F16 net has a administrator known as Asif... Do the maths. He was probably being patriotic.

Read it again, the response from the admins to your fake indian "Arnold" shows that the site still views it as a "hit", but can't claim a kill due to lack of evidence. This supports the PAF view that the stricken Su-30 may have limped back to its base, allowing the indians to cover it up.

upload_2020-8-10_15-13-42.png
 
.
Dear all,

It gives me great pleasure and amusement to witness our neighbors, fighting off online websites and sources to save their day. For a good many hours, we gave them a task so daunting. However, to even their surprise, this task was far less difficult than making Christian fair stop talking at their own literature fair festival, where she mentioned 'there was no F-16 stuck down' or a US report of F-16 count.

The question remains, for how long will they try to stop the water seeping in from the holes of their lies. The water eventually makes and the truth will too In fact it already has. Those who know, know.

Also, speaking of lies, this guy called Arnold Kenway Patel (probably), was actually not aware about the automated date and time stamp that is displayed alongside the comment. The poor chap made it seem as if his comment was made from an year ago at today's date. Little did he know. These small habits of lying, cheating and stealing will shine out there. For all we know, this guy can be our very own @Suriya. Lacks shame, honour, and discipline.

View attachment 660013



This is what a nation of 1.2 billion has gone down to. This is where they will remain. Dishonesty is their best defense and only hope.

Indian acting smart :lol:
 
.
Read it again, the response from the admins to your fake indian "Arnold" shows that the site still views it as a "hit", but can't claim a kill due to lack of evidence. This supports the PAF view that the stricken Su-30 may have limped back to its base, allowing the indians to cover it up.

View attachment 660058
No reference to sukhoi at all except the admin removing all references to the sukhoi. Probably the other admins told him to get in line and not lower the standard of f16.net.
 
. .
Does PL-15 have an AESA based integrated system? Otherwise it's quite easy to jam the signal between two different mediums. JF-17 also has a single engine which is quite under-powered and the RD-33 and its variants have quite a lot of problems.

The JF-17 isn't something that is cutting edge but a budget plane that is there to replace Pakistan's 3rd generation aircrafts. No matter what some analyst say, the Rafale is definitely more advanced without a doubt.

are you suggesting that the aim-120 is a very poor missile as it too does not have aesa radars ?

kv
 
.
No reference to sukhoi at all except the admin removing all references to the sukhoi. Probably the other admins told him to get in line and not lower the standard of f16.net.

Indians have been mentioning Shahzazuddin as well. We are not discussing people from other forums, at all. Just don't use this place to ignite such hateful remarks against someone imaginary.
 
.
Folks, it cannot get more impartial and official than this.

F-16.net has officially attributed an Su-30 kill to airframe #84606.

It is pertinent to note that F-16.net is run by professional staff from the United States and just recently they were able to validate the Su-30 kill through different sources in the military circles.

View attachment 659984

Cheers.

How many pilots is the IAF missing?
 
.
Instead of being so desperate for confirmation from a foreign non official site , much easier for ispr to release the evidence it has regarding the sukhoi. Ispr had promised to release the evidence.
Also why was the pakistani pilot involved with the sukhoi given a lower level commendation than the pilot who was involved with the mig21 ?
 
. .
Indians have been mentioning Shahzazuddin as well. We are not discussing people from other forums, at all. Just don't use this place to ignite such hateful remarks against someone imaginary.
Fine by me. Lets not refer to other forums at all. This forum has enough credibility for its members.
 
.
Instead of being so desperate for confirmation from a foreign non official site , much easier for ispr to release the evidence it has regarding the sukhoi. Ispr had promised to release the evidence.
Also why was the pakistani pilot involved with the sukhoi given a lower level commendation than the pilot who was involved with the mig21 ?
Why don't you guys release 'credible' information about the balakot strikes or is it still too premature? Expect nothing less than lies from scammers..
 
.
No reference to sukhoi at all except the admin removing all references to the sukhoi. Probably the other admins told him to get in line and not lower the standard of f16.net.
You are a hypocrite of the highest order, first talking about lowering the standard of f16.net which would otherwise be a good and credible source until it actually speaks out on your pilots' incompetence and secondly naming it as an unofficial foreign source. I'm sure if it was the other way around and the f16 was proved as downed, twitter, youtube and any other social media platform would have been swarmed by millions of people like you..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom