What's new

Featured F-16.net confirms Su-30MKI loss on 27th Feb

Man... does it even matter to the one when a bunch of guys aren't not even calling the loss of MiG a big thing? They don't even treat the loss of a Heli with 6 onboard, like a total disgrace for a professional force? how could we expect some change of honour in thinking in any area as such. They are programmed to do so and raise the count of posts and those call centers are designed to perform as such. From Military to an online agent; everyone is hell bent to twist, forge & manipulate right on the face with so much of confidence like this. Therefore, whether an article, a credible source, a forum or any professional or even their own Christian C. Fair tell them the truth; it doesn't matter or affect them at all unless that serves their purpose.

You make it sound like they're not even human, more like machines, maybe programmable androids.
 
.
Fine by me. Lets not refer to other forums at all. This forum has enough credibility for its members.
For those who have eye that can see, even this forum is enough to disprove absurd indian claims, lies and deceit. If you look at the postings of even one member who has proper knowledge about the subject matter, you may log off and never come back again (windjammer for e.g is enough to knock your socks off)
 
. .
Lol. India presented an same radar proof that F16 was shot. But here we are, Pakistani claims are true, while one side isn't.
F16.net isn't even official thing, but run by military enthusiastists or fans of F16 jet. ....

Why don't Indians present the radar data to F-16.net?

What's stopping Indians from doing that or has that already been tried and no one believes in the Indian data?
 
.
and i know this is off topic but can't we have more members from countries like azerbaijan, turkey, iran, russia etc. ? You know, people with logic and brains and not with undying obsession with pakistan..
 
.
Lol. India presented an same radar proof that F16 was shot. But here we are, Pakistani claims are true, while one side isn't.
F16.net isn't even official thing, but run by military enthusiastists or fans of F16 jet. They also have lots of unclaimed kills in the past based on "claims".
If it makes Pakistanis sleep better then fine. Let's forget about Doosra Bandi :)
Even a kindergarten kid can draw better sketches than Indians had to show and only an IAF pilot would allegedly engage a battle with his drop tanks attached.
Ironically DRDO has developed some alien technology that Indians can count 300 dead in Balakot, create the name for PAF pilot yet it took them 8 months to find out they shot down own chopper in their back yard.
 
. .
Folks, it cannot get more impartial and official than this.

F-16.net has officially attributed an Su-30 kill to airframe #84606.

It is pertinent to note that F-16.net is run by professional staff from the United States and just recently they were able to validate the Su-30 kill through different sources in the military circles.

View attachment 659984

Cheers.
wonder why Indian rush for Rafale ......
 
.
Lol. India presented an same radar proof that F16 was shot. But here we are, Pakistani claims are true, while one side isn't.
F16.net isn't even official thing, but run by military enthusiastists or fans of F16 jet. They also have lots of unclaimed kills in the past based on "claims".
If it makes Pakistanis sleep better then fine. Let's forget about Doosra Bandi :)
You mean those images made/edited with MS paint is the proof? Because of that embarrassment Bill Gates will curse the day Microsoft made that program (not that it was any good anyway).
 
.
As a Karachiite and Pakistani, I take awesome pride in Hassan Siddiqui who also hails from North Karachi.
The man behind Laash of Su-30 MKI :smitten:

hassan-PAF-1.jpg
 
. .
Instead of being so desperate for confirmation from a foreign non official site , much easier for ispr to release the evidence it has regarding the sukhoi. Ispr had promised to release the evidence.
Also why was the pakistani pilot involved with the sukhoi given a lower level commendation than the pilot who was involved with the mig21 ?

why, it’s far easier to let the IAF squirm and prove us wrong. The most important question to ask is, did the Russians count and confirm that all the Su-30s are accounted for?

KV
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom