Extra troops along China border will raise tensions, harm India's interests

[Skull and Bones]

"Currently, India has 40,000 troops in the disputed area, and if the further 100,000 is deployed, the total number of the troops will reach 140,000. In an era when precision-guided weapons are developing rapidly, everyone with common sense knows that concentrated troops could be eliminated easily"

This is the money shot. When the People's Daily says something like this, it means China is ready to blow away 140,000 Indian troops at anytime. I expect the war will begin within 1 or 2 years, as soon as more J-10B enter service.

A wave of T-99A2 and WZ-10A will be coming at you!

Maybe that reporter forgot to add that even poor country India has precision guided missile.

 

[SuperDoper]

we have tons of friends around the world, we have friend will fight together with us.you dont have,you get only lip service friends.and my best advice is stop thinking about using nuclear weapons,cause yours is so tiny tiny comparing with China's.

The Chinese may have friends if you chose to give them free money. But do you have allies? You know what I am saying? Have you ever thought about why you don't have allies?

 

[Tshering22]

First off, the eastern border was never properly manned post 1987 skirmish and Operation Meghdoot. This is the first time after more than 20 years that we are actually manning the posts properly.

 

[Nirvana]

we have tons of friends around the world, we have friend will fight together with us.you dont have,you get only lip service friends.and my best advice is stop thinking about using nuclear weapons,cause yours is so tiny tiny comparing with China's.

Vulgarity Not Allowed Here

 

[ramu]

we have tons of friends around the world, we have friend will fight together with us.you dont have,you get only lip service friends.and my best advice is stop thinking about using nuclear weapons,cause yours is so tiny tiny comparing with China's.

If you bring Pakistan in to it then Russia will be looking at a big target with a red cross on Shanghai and Beijing.

 

[beijingwalker]

If you bring Pakistan in to it then Russia will be looking at a big target with a red cross on Shanghai and Beijing.

Russia,now is one of China's best friends,and it wont risk the head for you,dont count on far away powers.if China is not 100% sure of the victory of a war,China will not do it.so it's all about timing.

 

[The enlightened]

"Currently, India has 40,000 troops in the disputed area, and if the further 100,000 is deployed, the total number of the troops will reach 140,000. In an era when precision-guided weapons are developing rapidly, everyone with common sense knows that concentrated troops could be eliminated easily"

This is the money shot. When the People's Daily says something like this, it means China is ready to blow away 140,000 Indian troops at anytime. I expect the war will begin within 1 or 2 years, as soon as more J-10B enter service.

A wave of T-99A2 and WZ-10A will be coming at you!

if i made all the people in the world[save chineese and pakistani] read this post and killed anyone who dared to hate you
it wouldnt be murder


it would be apocalypse

 

[danger007]

we have tons of friends around the world, we have friend will fight together with us.you dont have,you get only lip service friends.and my best advice is stop thinking about using nuclear weapons,cause yours is so tiny tiny comparing with China's.

ohhh

 

[Nirvana]

Russia,now is one of China's best friends,and it wont risk the head for you,dont count on far away powers.if China is not 100% sure of the victory of a war,China will not do it.so it's all about timing.

If PLA Is Looking for war They will have tough time than 1962....Is this Chinese Peaceful Rise ? Chinese claims On Arunachal , Sikkim are Absurd Just Like Claim on Whole South China sea , If PLA Wage a War with its Military Muscle they may end up Like Nazi Germany

 

[ramu]

Russia,now is one of China's best friends,and it wont risk the head for you,dont count on far away powers.if China is not 100% sure of the victory of a war,China will not do it.so it's all about timing.

That is the reason China is waiting since 1962 as it is not sure, in your words 100%. And we like to keep it that way. Now instead of repeating the same thing again and again, why not tell me what is wrong with India raising more troops given you intentions are clearly seen in your posts.

 

[beijingwalker]

If PLA Is Looking for war They will have tough time than 1962

in 1962 China was inferior to India in every aspect,it was in the middle of the great famine.China had no money,no industry,no food ,Tibet had nothing at that time,no roads,no airports,no railway.China had nothing in its favor,but still we managed with tiny resources to crush Indian army completely.

look at China now,economy several times of India's .tons of money, world's no.1 manufacturerer that can ensure mass production of weapons.tons of roads,airports,railway around the border area.now everything is in China's favor,it is so different from 1962.

 

[ramu]

in 1962 China was inferior to India in every aspect,it was in the middle of the great famine.China had no money,no industry,no food ,Tibet had nothing at that time,no roads,no airports,no railway.China had nothing in its favor,but still we managed with tiny resources to crush Indian army completely.

And yet China deployed 80,000 troops in 1962 against India. Even today, India has 40,000 troops mannin the border. If India is interested in not letting a repeat of 1962 by reinforcing its borders and making the count to 140,000 given 22 divisions of Chinese army can be swiftly deployed, what is the problem.

 

[beijingwalker]

That is the reason China is waiting since 1962 as it is not sure, in your words 100%. And we like to keep it that way. Now instead of repeating the same thing again and again, why not tell me what is wrong with India raising more troops given you intentions are clearly seen in your posts.

that's a very smart strategy,that means you have to throw in tons of money trying to defend but you dont know when the attack will come and you can not focus on developing the economy there,so over the years you just got nothing there but throwing in money.China saw that dillema long time ago so after defeating Indian troops we pulled back and threw the burden to India.otherwise it would be China throwing in money as a sitting duck waiting to be attacked.

 

[ramu]

that's a very smart strategy,that means you have to throw in tons of money trying to defend but you dont know when the attack will come and you can not focus on developing the economy there,so over the years you just got nothing there but throwing in money.China saw that dillema long time ago so after defeating Indian troops we pulled back and threw the burden to India.otherwise it would be China throwing in money as a sitting duck waiting to be attacked.

It is not the army which is focusing on developing the economy. We invest less than 3% of GDP on defence.

 

[SuperDoper]

in 1962 China was inferior to India in every aspect,it was in the middle of the great famine.China had no money,no industry,no food ,Tibet had nothing at that time,no roads,no airports,no railway.China had nothing in its favor,but still we managed with tiny resources to crush Indian army completely.

look at China now,economy several times of India's .tons of money, world's no.1 manufacturerer that can ensure mass production of weapons.tons of roads,airports,railway around the border area.now everything is in China's favor,it is so different from 1962.

Advancement is a natural tendency for humans, not something worth bragging about, besides what you have done is something already done many years ago by many others.
You don't have a competent leadership at this moment. You know what I am saying?
The French man calls you martians recently. Do you really belong here?
Why do you always try to screw yourself while you don't like it? You know what I am saying?

Why do you veto syrian draft with the Russians while you have nothing in it (it's russians interest) while stay put with the Lybian one while you have immense interest in it? Why do you always do that?
Why do you talk to the Americans for your south china sea interest, you think the Americans will take care of that for you? You know what I am saying?