Hurshid Celebi
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2015
- Messages
- 4,897
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
@Bismarck @Neptune @levina @Horus @Hakan @xenon54
From the criminologist point it is always a big fault to accuse an organisation, even if the forensic facts of the criminal scene speak an other language, it is unprofessional and too fast before analyzing the whole background connections !
If you do that too fast, you practical close the book and the investigation.
Especially if the accused organization has not taken responsibility.
But they had been easy able to take the responsibility as did they it often in the past end , like in Tunisia Hotel massacre and published videos from the attack or when they assassinated people.
We must analyze who profited from the blast in Ankara,who could organize it so professional, who,when and how happened the preparations and logistics, who gave the final order and the target and who darkened the trails?
That are the key points that must be answered before we can present facts or we can only accuse "the usual suspects"!
Terrorists never know for whom they act in reality.
Especially in Syria all major Turkish terror organizations (PKK, DHKP-C/ MLSPB, TKP-ML/TIKKO) are present for a long time;
and of course the International ISIS / DAES ( terrorists who invaded from around the globe),
which is very different to the Iraqi ISIS/DAES (90 % local population and 10% ex -BAATH soldiers and officers) !
Some examples from the past "Operation Chevrolet" ,
"LA Belle"
"Operation Chobar"
" Lockerbie"
and how the USA an their allies revenged. That's the difference of mighty serious states or easily closing a Book!
I want to say, that " A False Flag " is possible.
From the criminologist point it is always a big fault to accuse an organisation, even if the forensic facts of the criminal scene speak an other language, it is unprofessional and too fast before analyzing the whole background connections !
If you do that too fast, you practical close the book and the investigation.
Especially if the accused organization has not taken responsibility.
But they had been easy able to take the responsibility as did they it often in the past end , like in Tunisia Hotel massacre and published videos from the attack or when they assassinated people.
We must analyze who profited from the blast in Ankara,who could organize it so professional, who,when and how happened the preparations and logistics, who gave the final order and the target and who darkened the trails?
That are the key points that must be answered before we can present facts or we can only accuse "the usual suspects"!
Terrorists never know for whom they act in reality.
Especially in Syria all major Turkish terror organizations (PKK, DHKP-C/ MLSPB, TKP-ML/TIKKO) are present for a long time;
and of course the International ISIS / DAES ( terrorists who invaded from around the globe),
which is very different to the Iraqi ISIS/DAES (90 % local population and 10% ex -BAATH soldiers and officers) !
Some examples from the past "Operation Chevrolet" ,
"LA Belle"
"Operation Chobar"
" Lockerbie"
and how the USA an their allies revenged. That's the difference of mighty serious states or easily closing a Book!
I want to say, that " A False Flag " is possible.
Because some ultra nationalists and hardcore Islamists seem happy that the bombing happenned in the middle of Turkish capital. 
