Even Selfishly, Indians Should Not Be Hoping for Chaos and Collapse in Pakistan

[That Guy]

SAARC fell apart because of terrorism from pakistan causing environment to vitiate and making any talks non conclusive

,this forced rest of all to start BIMSTEC which is basically SAARC-pakistan.

Reality is India already dominates the region economically ,pakistan cannot digest that fact, whereas Bangladesh is growing due to its close ties with India.

IK has been the best thing happened to India, he destroyed the credibility of Pak army in the eyes of Awam ,something India coudn't have done.

Everyone would love IK's return.

Oh, is that why half of SAARCA members refused to back India's version of events?

This is India's narrative, and only India's.

India doesn't dominate anything. It has the largest economy, but other than exhorting some influence over the region, it is far from becoming the dominant power, especially since no one in South Asia trusts India.

This isn't even about what Pakistan wants.

IK's tenure resulted in multiple humiliations for India, but you can cope as much as you want.

The Pakistan Army already had a shit reputation since the days of Keyani, Raheel Sharif recovered it a bit, but it has remained trash for a long time.

In your efforts to cope, you've gotten a bunch of things mixed up and confused. I hope that cleared it up for you.

By the way, BIMSTEC is also pretty much dead in the water with no new major development. LOL

 

[TopGun786]

Stable Pakistan is always more favorable to India compared to unstable Pakistan.

The Taliban will be the next biggest threat to the world and India, if Pakistan collapses.

Then stop destabilizing it

 

[Burnol_Wala]

Then stop destabilizing it

you have enough Pakistanis to destroy urself from inside, we are just watching with popcorn

Oh, is that why half of SAARCA members refused to back India's version of events?

This is India's narrative, and only India's.

India doesn't dominate anything. It has the largest economy, but other than exhorting some influence over the region, it is far from becoming the dominant power, especially since no one in South Asia trusts India.

This isn't even about what Pakistan wants.

IK's tenure resulted in multiple humiliations for India, but you can cope as much as you want.

The Pakistan Army already had a shit reputation since the days of Keyani, Raheel Sharif recovered it a bit, but it has remained trash for a long time.

In your efforts to cope, you've gotten a bunch of things mixed up and confused. I hope that cleared it up for you.

By the way, BIMSTEC is also pretty much dead in the water with no new major development. LOL

india doesn't care if Imran wins or not, his tenure was no different , you were still begging from IMF , world bank and whining like a broken record on Kashmir with no one giving a f, Imran has no roadmap to improve the economy or social faultlines of pakistan, I see a civil war and defaulted economy in pakistan incoming soon

 

[TopGun786]

you have enough Pakistanis to destroy urself from inside, we are just watching with popcorn

Yes, we have enough Pakistanis from inside also... some traitors who sold their souls. That's true.
But yet again everyone knows who is funding and training terrorists inside Baluchistan, Iran, and Afghanistan.

There are many but the person above is special. I hope you did not forget your this ''hero''.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

Then stop destabilizing it

I am unsure why Pakistani friends pretend to be blind to the actual reason for the present Pakistani situation.

Most of Pakistan's mistakes stem from its decision to join the war against the Soviet Union in 1979 and its subsequent U-turn after (2001) the United States compelled it to act against individuals trained and equipped with weapons by the US and PAK army alone inside Pakistan.

Pakistan maintains that they lost thousands of people after joining in 2001 but the world doesn't much care. because most people are aware that those armed people did not originate from the moon but rather were produced by Pakistan with assistance from the USA during the cold war. And ultimately result in a civil war within the country and loss of lives. It has nothing to do with India or anyone else.

90% of the chaos was produced by Pakistani policies themselves, with only 10% coming from India.

What Pakistan has done in India in the name of "Freedom Fighter in Kashmir "terrorism", India has done nothing yet.

 

[TopGun786]

90% of the chaos was produced by Pakistani policies themselves, with only 10% coming from India.

You accepted 10% at least. So it means we can safely assume 90% came from India.

 

[GodToons]

Do you want them to die just because they want to cross over into India to make money instead of you desiring a world that neither has borders nor money ?



Good, then this upcoming Indian film should be screened tax free just like "The Kashmir Files" and "The Kerala Story" were :

Do it, Hirani is known agenda driven person. He is excellent in embedding the agenda in the movie and present in subtly.
Rang de basanti - is for naxals agenda
PK - was to defame hindus
Dhunki - lets see

 

[Rollno21]

like I said you don't know any thing about islam... there is no compulsion.

hindu as religion is oppressive PERIOD



nope.

You are saying it because you have not looked deep in it. You can try to be a murtad or pretend to be one for a week and then come and tell me if there is compulsion or not.

 

[Jugger]

BS

hindus only want to dominate and oppress muslims period,


good luck in trying to subdue us.. the Pak mil couldn't do you certainly can't.

Hindus just want to live and worship as per their religion, it's the muslims who want to dominate, convert and destroy their temples, as they did in the past.

 

[GodToons]

Oh, is that why half of SAARCA members refused to back India's version of events?

This is India's narrative, and only India's.

India doesn't dominate anything. It has the largest economy, but other than exhorting some influence over the region, it is far from becoming the dominant power, especially since no one in South Asia trusts India.

This isn't even about what Pakistan wants.

IK's tenure resulted in multiple humiliations for India, but you can cope as much as you want.

The Pakistan Army already had a shit reputation since the days of Keyani, Raheel Sharif recovered it a bit, but it has remained trash for a long time.

In your efforts to cope, you've gotten a bunch of things mixed up and confused. I hope that cleared it up for you.

By the way, BIMSTEC is also pretty much dead in the water with no new major development. LOL

Trust me, man! probably all in India wants IK back in power. Whatever RAW, CIA, MOSSAD are not able to do in Pakistan is executed by IK single handedly.

 

[Burnol_Wala]

Yes, we have enough Pakistanis from inside also... some traitors who sold their souls. That's true.
But yet again everyone knows who is funding and training terrorists inside Baluchistan, Iran, and Afghanistan.
View attachment 930119

There are many but the person above is special. I hope you did not forget your this ''hero''.

Don't give full toss to bowler if you don't want to get hit for a six, of course the enemy will expose your fault lines , you have done the same to us ,we are returning the favour with interest

 

[MilSpec]

Let's not pretend that India hasn't had a hand in helping destabilize its neighborhood. Ask the Sri Lankans, and the Nepalese if you don't give a **** about Pakistan's opinion.

There's a very good reason why SAARC fell apart, it wasn't because India convinced everyone to kick out Pakistan, it was because half of South Asia doesn't trust India, which has very little to do with Pakistan. The other half are either puppets or reluctant partners of India.

This is the reality that India has to contend with if it wants to dominate the region.

As for Pakistan's internal strife, India better pray that IK doesn't win this because if he comes back to power, India is going to back to being shamed on the international stage.

We do pray IK comes back to power.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Oh, is that why half of SAARCA members refused to back India's version of events?

Which events?

India doesn't dominate anything. It has the largest economy, but other than exhorting some influence over the region, it is far from becoming the dominant power, especially since no one in South Asia trusts India.

Really? India dominates the region completely, and except Pakistan much of SAARC has good relations with India. And its India which overshadows other "south asian nations" in everything.

Chief Ministers of individual Indian states metaphorically have bigger diplomatic clout than prime ministers of our "South Asian" neighbours.

IK's tenure resulted in multiple humiliations for India, but you can cope as much as you want.

Like? anything beyond "TeaWasFantastic"?

By the way, BIMSTEC is also pretty much dead in the water with no new major development. LOL

SAARC and BIMSTEC don't really have anything to offer us anyway.

 

[That Guy]

Which events?

Look up why SAARC broke up and what each individual member nation's stances were, as well as what was going on at the time.

Really? India dominates the region completely, and except Pakistan much of SAARC has good relations with India. And its India which overshadows other "south asian nations" in everything.

India does not. It has influence, but it doesn't dominate anything.

Once again, ask Sri Lanka and Nepal.

Chief Ministers of individual Indian states metaphorically have bigger diplomatic clout than prime ministers of our "South Asian" neighbours.

no they do not, stop making things up.

Like? anything beyond "TeaWasFantastic"?

SAARC and BIMSTEC don't really have anything to offer us anyway.

You brought up BIMSTEC, and I pointed out it's a shit show, and precisely because South Asian nations don't trust India.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

India does not. It has influence, but it doesn't dominate anything.

Once again, ask Sri Lanka and Nepal.

Ask for what? We still have these countries under our influence, even when China a bigger enemy has been wooing them.

no they do not, stop making things up.

And why do you think so? You think Shehbaz Sharif has bigger diplomatic clout than the Chief Minister of Maharashtra?

As I said the CM of individual Indian states have more value compared to PM of other South Asian countries internationally no matter how less it is.

You brought up BIMSTEC, and I pointed out it's a shit show, and precisely because South Asian nations don't trust India.

You can't measure trust, the only one salty with India is Pakistan.