What's new

Eve-teasers in India team raise a stink in China

Does this look Caucasian to you? World map of indigenous skin colour:D

Caucasians are not always white.

The Supreme Court in United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923) decided that Asian Indians were ineligible for citizenship because, though deemed "Caucasian" anthropologically, they were not white like European descendants since most laypeople did not consider them to be white people. This decision represented something of a contradiction because the court had itself equated "white persons" with "Caucasian" in the earlier Ozawa v. United States case

Really pathetic to stoop to such levels to prove an idiotic point on an online forum. Show some class.

I always reply in kind my friend. When people can trash India, I dont need to show any respect too.
 
Show me when Gandhi can be the #1 in the world in Olympic endurance competitions (swimming), strength competitions (weightlifting) or fighting competitions (martial arts).

In swimming and weightlifting alone China won 10 Gold medals, that is 10 times more than India got in the entire Olympics. :lol: (Actually India got zero so you can't even calculate it). They were smashed so badly by the Chinese contestants that nobody even remembers that they competed in the first place.

Indians are Caucasians? Give me a break. Caucasians can actually compete without fainting.

Does this look Caucasian to you? World map of indigenous skin colour:

mapofskinhueequi3.png


Pakistanis may be able to claim some Caucasian roots, but you Indians are pre-dominantly Dravidians.

LOL :rofl: lost it have you?

btw, Dravidians are caucasoids of south india. The majority race in india is known as autraloids. they are mostly below poverty line and they exist all over the south asia.
 
btw, Dravidians are caucasoids of south india. The majority race in india is known as autraloids. they are mostly below poverty line and they exist all over the south asia.

LOL here comes your Australoid race theories. :lol:

Care to expand on these theories?
 
Indians are ALL 99% of the same admixture.

In India, from anthropometric studies, one used to find traces of seven races of humans who intermixed to create the Indian race. Modern studies within regional contexts are still rare; so one mostly has to look back to the global genetic studies. Northwest India shares with west Asia and eastern Europe (and pockets in Africa and South East Asia) the maximum heterozygosity known among world populations, with means between 0.35 and 0.37; and the rest of India (and Europe) is only slightly lower: 0.33 to 0.35. This shows the vast amount of admixture that has gone on in these regions: to be contrasted against Australia which has a homozygosity of less than 0.25. It is currently accepted that at least four strata are visible in the populations in different parts of India.

An australoid-veddoid substratum.
A migration from the east of Austrasiatic and sino-tibetan language speaking groups.
Neolithic migrations from western Iran, probably proto-Dravidian.
The aryan expansion from north of Caspian sea via Turkmenia and Northern Iran.

Modern studies indicate that the major mtDNA lineages in India belong to the typically asian M haplogroup, whose Indian variety (T at np16223) probably originated around 48000 +/- 1500 years before present (i.e. about 46000 BC), and more than 98% of the M individuals carry this variety

Not sure what this means, but to answer that Dravidian and all kinds of crap conclusions, nope. Most Indians are almost all the same.

Plus race doesnt exist really, so we are simply talking about markers here.
 
to you? not worth the trouble :lol:

What, you think your fellow Indians are going to laugh at those theories? :D

Iran (a Caucasoid nation) won 4 Gold medals at the London Olympics.

South Korea (an East Asian nation) won 13 Gold medals at the London Olympics.

India, with one billion people, did not even win one single Gold medal at the London Olympics.

So I actually do agree with your Australoid theory.
 
In swimming and weightlifting alone China won 10 Gold medals, that is 10 times more than India got in the entire Olympics. :lol: (Actually India got zero so you can't even calculate it).


In entire Olympics India won 9 Gold medals

India_at_the_Olympics


So going by your calbulations = 10*9 =10

Chinese maths anyone? :lol:


Indians are Caucasians? Give me a break. Caucasians can actually compete without fainting.

Does this look Caucasian to you? World map of indigenous skin colour:

mapofskinhueequi3.png


Pakistanis may be able to claim some Caucasian roots, but you Indians are pre-dominantly Dravidians.

Chinese copycat of stormfront now? :lol:

How does Skin color becomes the prime factor of determining racial classification? Exception: Han supremacist's pocket Nazi book.

Is a tanned Causcasian less Caucasion?
 
What, you think your fellow Indians are going to laugh at those theories? :D

Iran (a Caucasoid nation) won 4 Gold medals at the London Olympics.

South Korea (an East Asian nation) won 13 Gold medals at the London Olympics.

India, with one billion people, did not even win one single Gold medal at the London Olympics.

So I actually do agree with your Australoid theory.

Dont be racist mate.
 
Dont be racist mate.

This thread was dead and buried several months ago, until your Indian friend "Enemy" decided to resurrect it with racist rants.

I'm not sure what you guys expected after that?
 
This thread was dead and buried several months ago, until your Indian friend "Enemy" decided to resurrect it with racist rants.

I'm not sure what you guys expected after that?

Well, so you sunk to his level.
 
Well, so you sunk to his level.

No, I did not sink to the level of Indians. Look at the first page, Indians call their fellow NE Indian women and East Asian women as "chinkis", even their Diplomatic Youth Delegation did this, as well as harassing those same women.

If I sunk to your level, I would call you guys "niggers". But I did not sink to that level. :wave:

Picking on women is really brave. When there are men around this will happen:


The one above is a Westerner, but you get my point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@CD...It all started as funny name and soon it become a racial slang. Most of the people who use these names don't even know that it can land them into trouble.

But again its not an excuse. We should be careful about these type of discrimination. How can we expect others to not to discriminate on basis of caste, creed, color, religion etc. and at the same time do this on a forum. I guess all those on this forum are literate people.

What's the difference between those people and us ?

I support you on the way this thread has been resurrected. Hope MODs close this thread.
 
No, I did not sink to the level of Indians. Look at the first page, Indians call their fellow NE Indian women and East Asian women as "chinkis", even their Diplomatic Youth Delegation did this, as well as harassing those same women.

The usage of the word Chinki in India is not akin to the usage in the western world. Over here we even refer to Bengalis as Bongs, people from AP as Goltis, and people from Gujarat as Gujjus. We dont mean to be racist, its just a slang.
 
Back
Top Bottom