What's new

End of American Era in Eqypt

Only if they have the right to legislate against Quran and Sunnah. "Shura" is the essence of Islam.

and democracy gives people the right to legislate without any limitations... thus it is kufr...

As for shura... The Caliphate shall have local representatives in the Majlis Ul Ummah to advise the Caliph on various issues... some of their suggestions will even be binding on the Caliph and he will have to do as they ask him to do...
 
The goal of an election is to let the people decide through secret ballots as to who is -- supposedly -- the better person to interpret the will of the people, and to create laws accordingly. If Islamic laws are clear enough to understand, then there would no need for any 'election' in the first place. But 'some assembly required' furnitures have clearer instructions than religious documents.

1. the US was'nt even designed to be a democracy in the first place. It was meant to be a republic. And since I know u wont be able to contest my statement, I wont even bother with further explanation of the US electoral system.

2. Are you sure that the result is decided upon the outcome of secret ballotting instead of the desires of the secret societies?

3. Islamic law has a different uncorrupted modus operandi of elections. google and though shall find.

4. Well if u got 6 versions of the Bible, it could get confusing:woot: on the contrary Islamic political ideology is not confusing at all. if u still don't understand anything beyond an IKEA assembly schematics, who IS to blame other than ur own self? :lol:
:pakistan:
 
1. the US was'nt even designed to be a democracy in the first place. It was meant to be a republic. And since I know u wont be able to contest my statement, I wont even bother with further explanation of the US electoral system.
From what I read above, I would say you know next to nothing about the US electoral system and what is 'democracy'. The US is indeed a 'republic' but we are also very much a democracy in that representatives are elected through popular vote. Raw democracy is undesirable and that was recognized a long time ago. The sentiments of the people can be fleeting and vague. Their passions should be filtered through exposures of ideas and discussions then tempered through compromises. There is nothing wrong with that and in no way does that diminish the truth that any society that engages its citizens through these methods qualify as a 'functional democracy'.

2. Are you sure that the result is decided upon the outcome of secret ballotting instead of the desires of the secret societies?
Yes...These secret societies controls not just the US but also the world...:rolleyes:

3. Islamic law has a different uncorrupted modus operandi of elections. google and though shall find.
Yeah...Let US know when there is a successful Islamic country that could compete with US.

4. Well if u got 6 versions of the Bible, it could get confusing:woot: on the contrary Islamic political ideology is not confusing at all. if u still don't understand anything beyond an IKEA assembly schematics, who IS to blame other than ur own self? :lol:
:pakistan:
Again...Yeah...Let US know when there is a successful Islamic country that could compete with US.
 
Every civilization thinks they are great untill

a) They assume they are above rest of world
b) They run out of cash
c) No one is willing to work hard they keep servants to do tasks

Look in history and you will find , economic meltdown , and natural desasters wash away civilizations as quickly as day and night change.
 
Every civilization thinks they are great untill

a) They assume they are above rest of world
b) They run out of cash
c) No one is willing to work hard they keep servants to do tasks

Look in history and you will find , economic meltdown , and natural desasters wash away civilizations as quickly as day and night change.

C) will bury you every time, Azad. A) and B) are merely derivatives of C, IMO
 
This is the tragedy of the arabs.

No industrialization. No progress. No foresight. No planning. No patience. No hope. When there is stability, it is squandered by a corrupt dictator. When there is no stability, nothing gets done. There is no urge to be better. There is no pride in their nation. How you be proud of a country that has produced cowardly dictator after cowardly dictator? They're trapped in a cycle of overthrowing one US dictator in favor of another. Why? Because they have no choice, they need to import food, they need to import machinery, they need to import everything and their only exports are labor and oil. The worst thing is, they are not ashamed of this. They don't want to improve. They buy luxury boats and gamble their oil money away.

Egypt in 1950 was better than China, India, Singapore, Vietnam, Japan, and South Korea. It had a higher GDP/capita, had more industry, even produced more electricity. Now? Even India has a higher HDI.

When the oil is gone, they'll be back to eating sand.

Every people has to deal with their tragedies. That's the conclusion reached by my parents and I as we watched events in Egypt unfold on TV. I have to admit that we largely discussed the tragedy of China as we watched Egypt. And that was the first time I saw them in months as I came back for Chinese New Years ...

I have a lot of sympathy for the Egyptians. I used to hang out with a group of Egyptian Canadians in college practically every night ... you know, shooting the unusual breeze for 3 hours while "studying" for half.

But since I made sure I "studied" old exams, I didn't end up paying too terribly for this inefficiency ...

AFAIAC, one chief reason the PRC is "less f^cked ^p" today on economical terms (even that's a shaky statement but we won't contest it for now) has less to do with China's own "effort" as much as owing to the examples set by China's "regional mentors".

Who were/are China's regional mentors in development? We would have to give credit to the four "tigers" of yore and big bad ol' Nippon, who in more ways than one was the "mentor" to the "Tigers".

All CCP bosses managed to do was to rent out the labour to these "mentors" while keeping a lid on things.

But for how long will people endure the corruptions?

Anyways, I realize that my above view is as partial as yours.

BTW, speaking of gamblers, have you seen Atlantic City? I am convinced that modern casinos are nothing but re-incarnations of opium dens for the average Chinese.

Anyways, back to the topic of "tragedy". The real tragedy for the Egyptians, or Arabs in general, is IMHO the "Custodians", or rather the "Maliks" and the "Emirs" masquerading as their "custodians".

The tragedy is in the examples they set.

BTW, I worked with many of the fine folks from the "Kingdom" and the "Emirates" during a significant portion of my professional career. I have nothing but the best things to say about many of them.

My best wish to Egypt.
 
Back
Top Bottom