What's new

Employment in India grew by 34% in last 8 years; women's participation rose to 25% of the workforce

Chanakya's_Chant

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
28
Country
India
Location
India
Annual job growth doubled in past decade: Economic census
UPA govt's record here twice as good as that of earlier NDA's; women's participation rose to a fourth of workforce

background-employment.jpg

Job growth in establishments during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government’s tenure was almost double the rise during the previous National Democratic Alliance (NDA) regime, provisional results of the Sixth Economic Census, issued on Wednesday, show.

According to the report, issued by the statistics and programme implementation ministry, the average annual job growth during 2005-14 was 4.3 per cent, compared to a 2.5 per cent annual rise in jobs during 1998-2005.

The Atal Behari Vajpayee-led NDA government was in power during 1998-2004, after which the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government took charge for a decade. During 2005-14, employment grew 34.3 per cent. In 2013-14, the establishments registered 127.7 million (mn)jobs, compared to 95.05 mn in 2005. (HOW THE NUMBERS FARED)

The economic census provides information on operational and economic variables, activity-wise, of the establishments across India. The latest round was conducted in January 2013-April 2014. The report noted the number of establishments in the country in 2013-14 were 58.5 mn. In 2005, the number of enterprises was 42.1 mn. The census defines an establishment as units engaged in production and/or distribution of goods and services, not for the purpose of sole consumption. An enterprise is termed as a multi-plant firm which can have multiple establishments across the country.

Close to 60 per cent of these establishments were based in rural parts. Around 40 per cent of the total were functioning inside households and 41.1 per cent had fixed structures outside a household. The census also reflected the increase in women's participation. The proportion of women workers in the total workforce in 2013-14 was 25.6 per cent, compared to 19.3 per cent in 2005. "This is a very good sign, as the employment has shown a four per cent annual growth during this period,” said Pronab Sen, chairman of the National Statistical Commission.

He, however, cautioned that one had to be careful in interpreting the figures, as “the data doesn’t capture if a person is under-employed”.

Sen said during the decade ending 2014, there were a lot of start-ups that entered the market, leading to an increase in the number of establishments. “As people developed skills, probably they started their own jobs,” he said. The average employment per establishment, however, declined in 2013-14 compared to 2005. In 2005, 2.3 people were employed in an establishment, which came down to 2.2 in 2013-14.

The Northeast states saw a big rise in the number of establishments. Manipur (109.4 per cent), Sikkim (102.9 per cent) and Assam (100.2 per cent) had the highest job rise. The economic census did not include establishments involved in crop production, plantation, public administration, defence and compulsory social security services.

Source:- Annual job growth doubled in past decade: Economic census | Business Standard News
Employment in India grew by 34% in 8 years: Sixth Economic Census - Firstbiz
 
. . .
Don't fall into that trap,i thought the same way first.The reality is UPA 1 gained from the good policies of the 1999-2004 NDA govt & UPA 2 got what UPA 1 did in 2004-2009.
Nah,mate..India's economy really rocketed under UPA-1.Let's give credit where it is due,in the globalised economy we live in;where things change in days and seconds,it is quite impossible to "cruise" and accelerate the economy on just the good work of the previous regime's 5 years.
 
.
Nah,mate..India's economy really rocketed under UPA-1.Let's give credit where it is due,in the globalised economy we live in;where things change in days and seconds,it is quite impossible to "cruise" and accelerate the economy on just the good work of the previous regime's 5 years.

Which reforms were enacted between 2004-09?
 
. .
Oh man.......are we still into this Congress vs BJP BS even after the verdict of General Elections?
 
. .
The significant increase in woman participation is pretty good, I would say, women are more honest than men in many ways. I have traveled multiple times in Bangalore metro buses for almost 2 years, Men conductors always used to find a way to cheat passengers without returning the balance amount, even a single rupee will be returned perfectly if the conductor is a woman. Hats off !!
 
. .
Well I don't know of any. So could you tell me? And it was a combination of jab and inquiry.
I dunno..man,maybe the experience that people have gone through in India in the past years or so?Before the NDA 1 and UPA it was miserable..The way life has changed for people positively at least in my part of the country?especially under UPA1?

Who are you kidding..you are like a cat ready to jump and declare victory.
 
.
Nah,mate..India's economy really rocketed under UPA-1.Let's give credit where it is due,in the globalised economy we live in;where things change in days and seconds,it is quite impossible to "cruise" and accelerate the economy on just the good work of the previous regime's 5 years.

UPA 1 was free from challenges like recession and they just continued the policies initiated by NDA .But UPA2 become a disaster by their own mistakes and coalition politics .They started MNREGA programs during the final years of UPA 1 and they got money because of the huge economic growth during 2004 to 2009.
But they couldnt forsee the problems behind these programs.
MNREGA actually plays a good role in present inflation.They distributed money for unproductive jobs like cutting of twigs on the road side.
On one side poor people began to buy good food items which is good but considerably pressurize our wrong food managment system.
 
.
UPA 1 was free from challenges like recession and they just continued the policies initiated by NDA .But UPA2 become a disaster by their own mistakes and coalition politics .They started MNREGA programs during the final years of UPA 1 and they got money because of the huge economic growth during 2004 to 2009.
But they couldnt forsee the problems behind these programs.
MNREGA actually plays a good role in present inflation.They distributed money for unproductive jobs like cutting of twigs on the road side.
On one side poor people began to buy good food items which is good but considerably pressurize our wrong food managment system.
True mate,UPA wasted all the gains on populist measures leading to runaway inflation.Ironically,when UPA1 came into power,one of their ad campaign points was the inflation of NDA era,which is present in any rapidly growing economy.
UPA 2 was a victim of the success of UPA 1 as well,the people were just not willing to accept reduced performance levels which was acceptable once.
UPA just failed to reform and strengthen institutions to cope with the changing era,not to forget its reluctance on market reforms.
 
.
True mate,UPA wasted all the gains on populist measures leading to runaway inflation.Ironically,when UPA1 came into power,one of their ad campaign points was the inflation of NDA era,which is present in any rapidly growing economy.
UPA 2 was a victim of the success of UPA 1 as well,the people were just not willing to accept reduced performance levels which was acceptable once.
UPA just failed to reform and strengthen institutions to cope with the changing era,not to forget its reluctance on market reforms.

It is not reluctance .It is coalition politics.
 
.
indias financial sector really sky rocket due to actions taken by manmoham singh when he was finance minster.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom