What's new

Egypt withdraws from US-led anti-Iran security initiative

Very uncharacteristic of Sisi’s Egypt. Guys, don’t get too excited.

Maybe Egypt wants more payment in exchange for lackeyism.

Depends not saying I like Sisi or the Morsi dude he overthrew but have you notice one thing tho is that both Saudi and Egypt have been expanding ties with the PRC and Russian Federation for some time also in enhance their military ties with both other powers thats the concern here in DC that Sisi could flip from being a American lackey to balancing ties,the Americans dont want a Arab nation to balance ties otherwise they will overthrow you or maim your country smithereens, again lets not get to excited but if they start balancing ties this could lessen the tensions between the competing Arab states,Iran and Turkey which will give the region a sigh of relief
 
. .
Depends not saying I like Sisi or the Morsi dude he overthrew but have you notice one thing tho is that both Saudi and Egypt have been expanding ties with the PRC and Russian Federation for some time also in enhance their military ties with both other powers thats the concern here in DC that Sisi could flip from being a American lackey to balancing ties,the Americans dont want a Arab nation to balance ties otherwise they will overthrow you or maim your country smithereens, again lets not get to excited but if they start balancing ties this could lessen the tensions between the competing Arab states,Iran and Turkey which will give the region a sigh of relief
Some very good points in your post...imagine the day egypt,turkey,Pakistan and iran combine forces and get rid of foreign interference in this region...but that is just a wishful dream...Israel and oil will always be the sources of troubles.
 
.
It is very clear that US wants war against Iran. But they want to use PGCC countries as their cannon fodders and help them logistically.

Two bird with one stone in mind of birdbrain Yankees:

1) They will sell more weapon to arab countries and make more money like Yemen war.

2) They damage Iran and hope for regime change in Iran.
 
. . . . .
They're trying very hard to start a protracted Iran, Iraq type war between Iran & GCC.

How and who are they?

Didn't Rahil Sharif stated repeatedly that IMCTC is not against any country but against terrorism.
Why it is termed as NATO on defence.pk? Trying to discredit it in eyes of Pakistanis?

If every one start to write titles by his choice, and label people and organizations, where's the limit?
Where's the link to the piece of $hit in OP?

It's alright, if we talk about ground realities and it's dynamics but seriously... Arab NATO lead by a Pakistani CoAS!!!!

Fiction aside, here are some unfortunate ground realities.....
- GCC don't have a population enough to man it's borders, so the whole assertion of they going to attack Iran doesn't make statistical sense. Where as IRGC commanders have militants supplies available in abundance from Pakistan, Afghanistan and India. It make more sense that Iran will make use of it's puppies in Pakistan, Afghan and India to carryout sabotage acts in GCC.
- every killing in Pakistan as well, is lead by Iran - India alliance, of course using it's Pakistanis puppies.

Still some thick headed continue to repeat the propaganda from Zardari era.
 
.
How and who are they?

Didn't Rahil Sharif stated repeatedly that IMCTC is not against any country but against terrorism.
Why it is termed as NATO on defence.pk? Trying to discredit it in eyes of Pakistanis?

If every one start to write titles by his choice, and label people and organizations, where's the limit?
Where's the link to the piece of $hit in OP?

It's alright, if we talk about ground realities and it's dynamics but seriously... Arab NATO lead by a Pakistani CoAS!!!!

Fiction aside, here are some unfortunate ground realities.....
- GCC don't have a population enough to man it's borders, so the whole assertion of they going to attack Iran doesn't make statistical sense. Where as IRGC commanders have militants supplies available in abundance from Pakistan, Afghanistan and India. It make more sense that Iran will make use of it's puppies in Pakistan, Afghan and India to carryout sabotage acts in GCC.
- every killing in Pakistan as well, is lead by Iran - India alliance, of course using it's Pakistanis puppies.

Still some thick headed continue to repeat the propaganda from Zardari era.
They are (and if you do not know who "they are" then you must be living in Marse!) indeed trying to start a PGCC war with Iran. Pakistan has been smart enough not to get in to the trap..and this crap about Iran using Pakistan to do any thing any where should stop..Iran is friend with Pakistan and I understand you love saudi *** lickers but mixing your personal preferences in a political discussion is a no winner.
 
.
How and who are they?

Didn't Rahil Sharif stated repeatedly that IMCTC is not against any country but against terrorism.
Why it is termed as NATO on defence.pk? Trying to discredit it in eyes of Pakistanis?

If every one start to write titles by his choice, and label people and organizations, where's the limit?
Where's the link to the piece of $hit in OP?

It's alright, if we talk about ground realities and it's dynamics but seriously... Arab NATO lead by a Pakistani CoAS!!!!

Fiction aside, here are some unfortunate ground realities.....
- GCC don't have a population enough to man it's borders, so the whole assertion of they going to attack Iran doesn't make statistical sense. Where as IRGC commanders have militants supplies available in abundance from Pakistan, Afghanistan and India. It make more sense that Iran will make use of it's puppies in Pakistan, Afghan and India to carryout sabotage acts in GCC.
- every killing in Pakistan as well, is lead by Iran - India alliance, of course using it's Pakistanis puppies.

Still some thick headed continue to repeat the propaganda from Zardari era.
So Arab dictators who founded the biggest terrorist organization in history ever (ISIS) want to fight terrorism! and we are supposed to believe it?!
Saudi Arabia and UAE supported U.S designation of IRGC as a terrorist group, no more disguise.

Wahhabism is the sole motive behind bomb attacks, the very same source which is running it's Madrasahs in Pakistan. so don't try to hide behind IRAN/India accusations.

They're trying very hard to start a protracted Iran, Iraq type war between Iran & GCC.
So this theory has many supporters even in Iran, but I disagree. I believe they are bluffing.
Their goal is to suppress any uprising against regional dictators, we have seen it in Bahrain and Yemen already.
 
.
So Arab dictators who founded the biggest terrorist organization in history ever (ISIS) want to fight terrorism! and we are supposed to believe it?!
Saudi Arabia and UAE supported U.S designation of IRGC as a terrorist group, no more disguise.

Wahhabism is the sole motive behind bomb attacks, the very same source which is running it's Madrasahs in Pakistan. so don't try to hide behind IRAN/India accusations.

Isis is mutual drama of CIA and IRGC.
In beginning, US used Isis to attack GCC Arabia but they failed so they decided to kill Muslims instead and malign Islam using their power full media.
There's no wahabisim... it's a term concocted by axis of evil, trumpeted much at defence.pk during Zardari rule and that's about it.
Islam evolved in Pakistan is not the same as GCC Islam. It's has more common to it what Iran preach to it's puppies in Pakistan.... there's not a single Madrassa in Pakistan controlled by any so called Wahabi.

BTW... your quoted my post but you didn't addressed what i wrote but continued with your blame game to another level.
 
Last edited:
.
Depends not saying I like Sisi or the Morsi dude he overthrew but have you notice one thing tho is that both Saudi and Egypt have been expanding ties with the PRC and Russian Federation for some time also in enhance their military ties with both other powers thats the concern here in DC that Sisi could flip from being a American lackey to balancing ties,the Americans dont want a Arab nation to balance ties otherwise they will overthrow you or maim your country smithereens, again lets not get to excited but if they start balancing ties this could lessen the tensions between the competing Arab states,Iran and Turkey which will give the region a sigh of relief

This ^ is what struck me too

Moving away from US dependence....

If this is the path they take, then the time is not far when the yellow flags gather to attack Egypt...

Strange things happening in Libya and Sudan recently....
 
Last edited:
.
This ^ is what struck me too

Moving away from US dependence....

If this is the path they take, then the time is not far when the yellow flags gather to attack Egypt...

Strange things happening in Libya and Sudan recently....

Exactly I am for Egypt and Saudi balancing ties but Yankee will not allow this have you noticed in recent times that the Western media is all ganging up on Sisi over "human rights" these days you know they on to strangling this dude as well
 
.
Isis is mutual drama of CIA and IRGC.
In beginning, US used Isis to attack GCC Arabia but they failed so they decided to kill Muslims instead and malign Islam using their power full media.
There's no wahabisim... it's a term concocted by axis of evil, trumpeted much at defence.pk during Zardari rule and that's about it.
Islam evolved in Pakistan is not the same as GCC Islam. It's has more common to it what Iran preach to it's puppies in Pakistan.... there's not a single Madrassa in Pakistan controlled by any so called Wahabi.

BTW... your quoted my post but you didn't addressed what i wrote but continued with your blame game to another level.
Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Al-Nusra, Tahria Al-sham, Buku-Haram and the rest of wahhabi militias is the main fruit of U.S.A & Saudi Arabia cooperation, and you can't deny it:
Wahhabism was spread at behest of West during Cold War: Mohammed bin Salman

Saudi Arabia doesn't need to control schools in Pakistan or any other country, and these schools don't teach violence either, advertising Takfiri scholars (like Ebn-Teimiah or Muhammad-ibn-Abdul-wahhab) is more than enough for the future purposes. at this stage, students should learn their religion through these scholars.

after graduation, all is needed to have a suicide bomber is that someone would discuss the rest of thoughts (from these so called great scholars) which weren't taught in the schools.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom