What's new

Egypt’s search for its identity

NeutralCitizen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
4,217
Reaction score
0
Last year, Egyptians poured into the streets determined to seize a role in governing their future. Their primary goal was to change the constitution in order to ensure free, fair and competitive elections for president toward the end of the year.

The result eighteen days later was far beyond popular expectations. The head of state, head of government and head of parliament were all removed from office.

These results were inspirational. There was a sense of euphoria throughout Egypt. Egypt had achieved its awakening.

There was, however, no clear leader or leadership structure to this uprising. Without a natural leader for the population to coalesce around, it was clear that managing the post-revolutionary phase would be complicated.

The political vacuum that ensued enabled old and new stakeholders to lay claims on the future of Egypt.

Consequently, it has been a bumpy ride. This is particularly so because Egypt’s roadmap for political reconstruction placed elections for parliament and possibly even president before the establishment of a new constitution.

This was also exacerbated by a general breakdown of authority with the military high commission, the government, the parliament and the street all jockeying for position.

The result one year later is a fierce debate about the composition of the constitutional commission, severe tensions between parliament and the rest of government, anger from all towards the military commission, and an economy suffering from this instability.

I am frustrated. I am worried. But I am not pessimistic.

Egypt’s challenge is to determine its identity. That is what people are searching for - the face of 21st Century Egypt. It is a daunting challenge, but the search itself is part of the healing process.

The choices before Egypt are not whether to become Islamic or secular. Egyptians are both and have always lived within a civilian society. I expect that to continue.

Egyptians cannot afford to relegate women or minorities - religious, ethnic or political - to second-class status. They constitute half of our society and have always had a prominent role in the public domain from Nefertiti, the first Pharoanic Queen, onwards.

Similarly, Egypt cannot isolate itself from the global community and the vitality of youth when over 56% of its population is today below the age of 25. Egypt, a proud nation, will regain its leadership in the Middle East.

All Egyptians know and understand this. In fact, they share these aspirations even where they differ on how they can be met. Our search for our identity in the 21st Century will thus be challenging but remains on solid ground. Mistakes have been made, challenges remain ahead and the road forward may not always be open and inspiring, but ultimately it is the only one available for Egyptians who share this common aspiration.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of Nabil Fahmy.





It's either a Nationalist Egypt or an Islamist Egypt, maybe a mix of both is better.
 
. .
Islamist and nationalist are NOT antithetical.
Look at Iran, they are nationalist and consider themselves Islamist.
Israel the same. We have tried secularism. Failed.
Egypt: Islamic\Arab identity 4ever.
 
.
Islamist and nationalist are NOT antithetical.
Look at Iran, they are nationalist and consider themselves Islamist.
Israel the same. We have tried secularism. Failed.
Egypt: Islamic\Arab identity 4ever.

Your points fail Iran is more islamist then nationalism.
Who has tried saudi arabia ? egypt had secularism 50's and 60's and 70's and it was good.

Egypt Identity is based off Egyptian Nationalism/Arab & Islam not fully islam, the Muslim brotherhood candidate was in the Nasser youth the biggest ego since nasser, without Modernizing our ideas egypt cannot enter the 21st century otherwise just end up like another saudi arabia.

Egypt Must follow a Malaysia style approach if it is to be a successful Muslim country that balances both Secularism and Islam.
 
.
Tunisia's new constitutions does not implement Shariah, but maintains the countries Islamic Identity something that needs to be looked at closer, also Malaysia style of Islam and Secularism should be looked at.
 
.
Alot of Iranian are Persian nationalists who are not muslim, but then you get the muslims who are not not that much in love about pre islamic persian history.

when it comes to Iran, it is a very complicated matter.
 
.
Alot of Iranian are Persian nationalists who are not muslim, but then you get the muslims who are not not that much in love about pre islamic persian history.

when it comes to Iran, it is a very complicated matter.

Egyptians even the most religious/nationalisy take pride in Pre Islamic history in Egypt, pyramids won't be destroyed.
 
.
people say the arab countries should follow the turkish model but turkey is not an islamic country and there is no turkish model to follow, also egypt has many elements turkey has including a military that can overthrow a democratic government. I favor looking at Tunisia and Malaysia.
 
.
Your points fail Iran is more islamist then nationalism.
Who has tried saudi arabia ? egypt had secularism 50's and 60's and 70's and it was good.

Egypt Identity is based off Egyptian Nationalism/Arab & Islam not fully islam, the Muslim brotherhood candidate was in the Nasser youth the biggest ego since nasser, without Modernizing our ideas egypt cannot enter the 21st century otherwise just end up like another saudi arabia.

Egypt Must follow a Malaysia style approach if it is to be a successful Muslim country that balances both Secularism and Islam.
Why not look at Turkey? They are secular with an Islamic flavour.
We are sick of corrupt secular leaders who persecute Muslims in the name of fighting terror. Ibn Ali, Bashar, Saddam, Qaddafi...
The election reflected the Egyptian street, lets give MB a chance.

people say the arab countries should follow the turkish model but turkey is not an islamic country and there is no turkish model to follow, also egypt has many elements turkey has including a military that can overthrow a democratic government. I favor looking at Tunisia and Malaysia.
They could also create their own model for others to follow.
Again, remember Israel.
 
.
Why not look at Turkey? They are secular with an Islamic flavour.
We are sick of corrupt secular leaders who persecute Muslims in the name of fighting terror. Ibn Ali, Bashar, Saddam, Qaddafi...
The election reflected the Egyptian street, lets give MB a chance.

Turkey cannot be followed Egypt already has elements similiar to turkey and if turkey was perfect why would muslim kurds be revolting ? Egypt has Christians a large amount of them Malaysia is a muslim country that allows islamic law for muslims but secular laws for non muslims this is something to look at MB must please the entire egyptian people otherwise they will be thrown out.

Why not look at Turkey? They are secular with an Islamic flavour.
We are sick of corrupt secular leaders who persecute Muslims in the name of fighting terror. Ibn Ali, Bashar, Saddam, Qaddafi...
The election reflected the Egyptian street, lets give MB a chance.


They could also create their own model for others to follow.
Again, remember Israel.

Israel model is successful however not a single arab islamist or secular government has this is the problem.
Ibn Ali, Bashar, Saddam, Qaddafi were secular due to extremism we can see today in the arab/muslim world.
 
.
Muslim World has suffered from Secular dictators due to the extremism and radicalism erupting we have to take a good look at ourselves on why the Arab world is neither up on par with the rest of the world on education, science. From being free from the turks to the french and british only then to be replaced by secular leaders and Kings to Islamists where is the next path heading ? reform is needed badly otherwise we will remain weak and divided.
 
. .
if turkey was perfect why would muslim kurds be revolting ?

wrong... there isn't any revolt, there is terrorism. and it isn't by muslims, you should know better. pkk is a communist terrorist group, and we all have seen how much communism loves religion.

you should know that most of them are either of Armenian decent and practice some other religion that isn't one of the big five, or some corrupt people that want's dirty money. and you know what Islam says about dirty money.

muslim Kurds know what pkk does and doesn't support them, it is just two faced corrupt people who does that.


a note to you, during Ramadan when people go to mosque to pray pkk forces children to steal their shoes and when the police catches them and ask what they where doing they say "we pray" police asks again "how many rakah is it" he says 30 something.

you should know better when supporting communists.
 
.
wrong... there isn't any revolt, there is terrorism. and it isn't by muslims, you should know better. pkk is a communist terrorist group, and we all have seen how much communism loves religion.

you should know that most of them are either of Armenian decent and practice some other religion that isn't one of the big five, or some corrupt people that want's dirty money. and you know what Islam says about dirty money.

muslim Kurds know what pkk does and doesn't support them, it is just two faced corrupt people who does that.


a note to you, during Ramadan when people go to mosque to pray pkk forces children to steal their shoes and when the police catches them and ask what they where doing they say "we pray" police asks again "how many rakah is it" he says 30 something.

you should know better when supporting communists.
and who is funding them ?
 
.
Seculars are a real nuisance. Its clear what's egypt identity is, its overwhelmingly Islamic and Arab in nature. Secularism cannot
be the identity of any muslim country. Why don't egypt hold a referendum and see what egyptian think their identity is rather than waiting for the Yanks and Europeans to choose an identity for them.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom