What's new

Economic: India, Pakistan playing their Great Game

Hi JB,

Let me rephrase my comments and sorry to offend you. If japan made cheap equipment, it was not on purpose. It is against the psyche of a japanese to make a cheap item on purpose and continue making it as such. So, that cheap product in the 50's and early 60's was only circumstantial---ie after the ww11.

Sigatoka, let us leave aside the millionaires--that is not what I am getting to----what I am getting to is that an individual has the ability to go and finace a car/truck and also buy a house with ease, plus a boat parked in his garage. You don't have college degree, you can get jobs paying you 30, 40, 50, 60, 100k dollars and more a year jobs.

When the armies go to battle, they fight with what they have. When they play cricket, they field the best team they have. Sick players don't bring you glory.

Nigeria's problem is not corruption----but it the frame of mind that the nigerians live in. They don't have the guts, gumption, tennacity, work ethics, hardiness, nationalism etc etc of the japanese and niether do my pakistani brethren.
 
hi Neo, infact if we have a look on FDI growth of Pakistan which was about 250% last year, with total of about $3.8bn for the financial year 2005-2006, simple calculation says it may touch even $10bn for the current financial year while $10bn FDI is even target of India for this year. but if we do analysis of the FDI pakistan received last year, out of $3.8bn, $0.7bn came through FII which look for just portfolio investments and can be taken from share market even because of a rumor. and about $1.6bn came in pakistan through privatization. and out of rest $1.5bn, about $1.0bn came in just energy sector.( please correct if I miss data’s as I don’t have time to search google for exact figures.)
Your analysis is pretty accurate except for some figures. Privatisation amounted approx. $1.8 billion and projected FDI for current fiscal year is $7 billion not $10, which again is pretty good compared to other regional players.

infact FDI is FDI whether it comes in energy sector or in manufacturing sector, but if it comes in manufacturing sector, it directly increase export while for a non-oil exporting country like pakistan, FDI in energy sector is not going to support export of pakistan. and FDI through privatization depends on your capacity to do privatization. how much you have to privatize.
Pakistan is in the process of designing second phase reforms based around heavy industry and manufacturing, it will be launched during 2007/08 fiscal year. Major players include Gwadar deep sea port which will be inaugrated by the end of this year, exploiting Iron ore, Copper ore and Coal in Balochistan and Sindh, widening auto mobile industry, steel and oil refineries. Severl industrial parks and tax free zones are planned or under construction to enhace the projected FDI of $10-12 billion in 2007/08.
IT related business and outsoursing should get a boom during the same period.

250% growth in FDI for pakistan is really impressive but it can not be said to be excellent until pakistan get more FDI in manufacturing sector. thanks
Pakistan started from scratch, remember just six years ago we were going thru our worse resession. Internal and Regional instabilty kept investors away but we've come back to become a major player and we're doing well sofar.
I agree, we need more investment in manufacturing sector, but like I explained above the emphesis during next fiscal years will be on heavy industry and manufacturing. :cheers:
 
Your analysis is pretty accurate except for some figures. Privatisation amounted approx. $1.8 billion and projected FDI for current fiscal year is $7 billion not $10, which again is pretty good compared to other regional players.


Pakistan is in the process of designing second phase reforms based around heavy industry and manufacturing, it will be launched during 2007/08 fiscal year. Major players include Gwadar deep sea port which will be inaugrated by the end of this year, exploiting Iron ore, Copper ore and Coal in Balochistan and Sindh, widening auto mobile industry, steel and oil refineries. Severl industrial parks and tax free zones are planned or under construction to enhace the projected FDI of $10-12 billion in 2007/08.
IT related business and outsoursing should get a boom during the same period.


Pakistan started from scratch, remember just six years ago we were going thru our worse resession. Internal and Regional instabilty kept investors away but we've come back to become a major player and we're doing well sofar.
I agree, we need more investment in manufacturing sector, but like I explained above the emphesis during next fiscal years will be on heavy industry and manufacturing. :cheers:
one thing i would like to know, if total FDI in Pakistan for the financial year 2005-06 was $3.2bn (excluding FII) and $1.8bn came thru just privatization, then how much FDI pakistan got in manufacturing sector? if i guess pakistan got about $1bn in just energy sector, then rest $0.4bn - $0.5bn in manufacturing is very less.

here pakistan is on one major risk becoz of widen trade deficit. this may give some wrong message to foreign investors who have paid $1=60rupees. if any type of sudden fall occurs with pakistani currency, they may loose their confidence. but this widen trade deficit is not going to be controlled soon becoz of high oil prices. and also the way export of pakistan is showing (-)ve growth for last few months, foreign reserve of pakistan will have more pressure in future. there is a need of keeping inflation lower and increasing export with some control on import. this is a challenge for pakistani policy makers otherwise once foreign investors will loose their confidence, all the projections of FDI will remain a dream.
 
1. Sigatoka, let us leave aside the millionaires--that is not what I am getting to----what I am getting to is that an individual has the ability to go and finace a car/truck and also buy a house with ease, plus a boat parked in his garage. You don't have college degree, you can get jobs paying you 30, 40, 50, 60, 100k dollars and more a year jobs.

2. Nigeria's problem is not corruption----but it the frame of mind that the nigerians live in. They don't have the guts, gumption, tennacity, work ethics, hardiness, nationalism etc etc of the japanese and niether do my pakistani brethren.


1. Are you talking about U.S., you may be suprised to know that the lowest paid workers wages have been growing slower than inflation over there for the past five years. Its not all rose and sunshine over there as you claim.

2. What ever, why is it that people who migrate from India, Pak. or Nigeria and move to developed natinos see a sudden boost in income?? Overnight their bodies, mind is converted to some superior form? Or could it be more reasonably because they have access to more human and physical capital and better technology?
 
1. here pakistan is on one major risk becoz of widen trade deficit.

2. foreign reserve of pakistan will have more pressure in future.

3.there is a need of keeping inflation lower and increasing export with some control on import. this is a challenge for pakistani policy makers otherwise once

4. foreign investors will loose their confidence, all the projections of FDI will remain a dream.

1. A trade deficit pre se isnt harmful if the debt is undertaken for profitable ventures.

2. Foreign reserves will only be put under pressure if the government mandates that the reserve bank support the value of the currency by selling reserves. It is a misconception that somehow the reserves change on their own, if Pak. pursued a floating exchange rate, the reserves of the bank wouldnt change a single cent in the whole year.

3. Putting controls on imports will raise, not lower inflation. (think about it, a lot of things we consume r imports and when they r restricted, prices go up)

4. This is an overly pessimistic view. There are so many restrictions on FDI that Pak. has in place that the FDI figures can be increased simply by culling these stupid restrictions over time.
 
1. A trade deficit pre se isnt harmful if the debt is undertaken for profitable ventures.

2. Foreign reserves will only be put under pressure if the government mandates that the reserve bank support the value of the currency by selling reserves. It is a misconception that somehow the reserves change on their own, if Pak. pursued a floating exchange rate, the reserves of the bank wouldnt change a single cent in the whole year.

3. Putting controls on imports will raise, not lower inflation. (think about it, a lot of things we consume r imports and when they r restricted, prices go up)

4. This is an overly pessimistic view. There are so many restrictions on FDI that Pak. has in place that the FDI figures can be increased simply by culling these stupid restrictions over time.

1. thats a good idea, if government take debt and use for profitable venture. this may make availability of foreign currency and can give some time to tackle widen trade deficit. but the case of pakistan is not that simple, first import has taken a large size and still growing with above 20% rate and on the other hand export is having -ve growth for last few months. infact the import for last few months are almost double to that of export. only foreign debt can't work longer for a country like Pakistan which has high debt. government have to think for more.

2. with growing import, even if foreign reserve maintains the level it had, it is not good. for a healthy economy, foreign reserve would increase with growing import. here the case of pakistan is such that foreign reserve is now decreasing from last few months. this is no misperception, this is a truth which is written on the wall, “widen trade deficit make direct impact on foreign reserve”.

3. you right that high import will reduce inflation because of availability of products. but government has to find some different way for making availability of products from inside the country rather that importing it. If you want to import things, you gotto have foreign reserve and if export is low, you will not get much foreign currency for importing things. isn’t?

4. bro if things goes good on trade side, nothing will happen with FDI and Pakistan will be able to maintain inflow of FDI and if Pakistan will suffer any sudden depreciation of her currency becoz of widen trade deficit, that FDI will also be taken away by foreign investors which Pakistan got last year.
 
2. with growing import, even if foreign reserve maintains the level it had, it is not good. for a healthy economy, foreign reserve would increase with growing import.

3. here the case of pakistan is such that foreign reserve is now decreasing from last few months. this is no misperception, this is a truth which is written on the wall, “widen trade deficit make direct impact on foreign reserve”.

4. government has to find some different way for making availability of products from inside the country rather that importing it. If you want to import things, you gotto have foreign reserve and if export is low, you will not get much foreign currency for importing things. isn’t?

2. You are wrong. The level of foreign reserves is only affected by the central bank deciding to increase or deplete its foreign reserves.

3. A widening trade deficit doesnt reduce foreign reserves. A trade deficit can be financed by the public borrowing from overseas, the govt. borrowing from overseas or the nation selling assets to foreigners. Since foreign reserves are an asset, it can be sold/depleted in the short run to finance the trade deficit. However if the central bank doesnt sell reserves, a trade deficit doenst mean a reducing foreign reserves.

4. You dont need foreign reserves to import. If the central bank has no foreign reserves, import (trade) doent stop. All that happens is that the exchange rate is determined purely by the market forces of supply and demand.

If export goes down, the currency will depreciate on its own (even with zero foreign reserves) because the demand for the rupee will go down and thus imports will become more expensive and hence will go down. The second route is that exports go down, people borrow from overseas so no effect on currency and imports stays same. (Is this a free lunch? Not really, because you forego future consumption to maintain current consumption)

p.s. Note to mods, cud we split where this thread into the economics section.
 
2. You are wrong. The level of foreign reserves is only affected by the central bank deciding to increase or deplete its foreign reserves.

3. A widening trade deficit doesnt reduce foreign reserves. A trade deficit can be financed by the public borrowing from overseas, the govt. borrowing from overseas or the nation selling assets to foreigners. Since foreign reserves are an asset, it can be sold/depleted in the short run to finance the trade deficit. However if the central bank doesnt sell reserves, a trade deficit doenst mean a reducing foreign reserves.

4. You dont need foreign reserves to import. If the central bank has no foreign reserves, import (trade) doent stop. All that happens is that the exchange rate is determined purely by the market forces of supply and demand.

If export goes down, the currency will depreciate on its own (even with zero foreign reserves) because the demand for the rupee will go down and thus imports will become more expensive and hence will go down. The second route is that exports go down, people borrow from overseas so no effect on currency and imports stays same. (Is this a free lunch? Not really, because you forego future consumption to maintain current consumption)

p.s. Note to mods, cud we split where this thread into the economics section.

i tried to find reference of any book for you but couldnt find on google. here we have reference a business magazine of pakistan. go through this new, this may help you to build some concept.

http://www.brecorder.com/index.php?id=470086&currPageNo=1&query=&search=&term=&supDate=

Rs 45.07 billion decline in banks' net foreign assets in July

M ISRAR KHAN



ISLAMABAD (August 31 2006): The net foreign assets (NFA) of the banking system (central and scheduled banks) have gone down to Rs 717.61 billion during July 2006, against Rs 762.67 billion in June before the end of 2005-06, illustrating a decline of Rs 45.07 billion.

The reason is said to be the widening trade deficit that resulted in massive outflows of foreign assets as well as lower net receipts in external financing.


The central bank's 'Pakistan Monetary Survey', which is analytical account of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and scheduled banks, based on monthly reporting released on Wednesday showed that both central and scheduled banks contributed to the overall decline in the NFA.

SBP's own analytical account, which excludes scheduled banks, there was a decline of Rs 28.62 billion in NFA held with SBP. During the first month of the new fiscal 2006-07--July--NFA with the bank stood at Rs 609.88 billion, against Rs 638.51 billion at the end June 2006.

The scheduled banks' NFA declined to Rs 107.73 billion from Rs 124.17 billion in June 2006 showing a decrease of Rs 16.44 billion.

The analytical accounts say that the scheduled banks' claims on non-residents (FAs) stood at Rs 136.57 billion, among which, foreign currency with scheduled banks was worth Rs 6.48 billion, deposits Rs 55.32 billion and securities other than shares stood at Rs 74.77 billion, while liabilities to non-residents stood at Rs 28.84 billion that comprised deposits worth Rs 23.418 billion and loans at Rs 5.428 billion.

The decline in the central bank's NFA was inline with the volume of its intervention in the forex market to reduce exchange rate volatility, while the decline in scheduled banks' NFA was the outcome of stable exchange rate expectations that led to robust increase in trade-related lending against foreign exchange cir-25 (FE-25) deposits.

During the month (July) total claims of non-residents were worth Rs 969.48 billion (declined from Rs 1.023 trillion in June 2006) among which their liabilities were at Rs 251.87 billion. On balance, the NFA (central and scheduled banks) stood at Rs 717.61 billion.

The NFA with the Sate Bank stood at Rs 609.88 billion; its claims on non-residents (FA's) stood at Rs 832.91 billion, while their liabilities to non-residents were Rs 223.03 billion.

Out of total non-resident claims, money gold coin and bullion stood at Rs 77.56 billion; special drawing rights (SDRs) holdings with IMF and SBP at Rs 13.13 billion, foreign currency Rs 1.39 billion, securities other than shares (foreign securities) Rs 523.35 billion and deposits stood at Rs 125.22 billion.

During June 2006, these stood at Rs 77.66 billion, Rs 13.02 billion, Rs 1.39 billion, Rs 555.31 billion and Rs 121.51 billion, respectively.

Liabilities to non-residents (foreign liabilities) of SBP increased to Rs 223.03 billion in July from Rs 222.64 billion in June 2006.

During the month under review these liabilities comprised deposits of Rs 42.30 billion, securities other than shares (N.N.N.I.B securities) at Rs 84.28 billion and loans (IMF loan I, PRGF and SDF) stood at Rs 96.45 billion.
 
2. You are wrong. The level of foreign reserves is only affected by the central bank deciding to increase or deplete its foreign reserves.

3. A widening trade deficit doesnt reduce foreign reserves. A trade deficit can be financed by the public borrowing from overseas, the govt. borrowing from overseas or the nation selling assets to foreigners. Since foreign reserves are an asset, it can be sold/depleted in the short run to finance the trade deficit. However if the central bank doesnt sell reserves, a trade deficit doenst mean a reducing foreign reserves.

4. You dont need foreign reserves to import. If the central bank has no foreign reserves, import (trade) doent stop. All that happens is that the exchange rate is determined purely by the market forces of supply and demand.

If export goes down, the currency will depreciate on its own (even with zero foreign reserves) because the demand for the rupee will go down and thus imports will become more expensive and hence will go down. The second route is that exports go down, people borrow from overseas so no effect on currency and imports stays same. (Is this a free lunch? Not really, because you forego future consumption to maintain current consumption)

p.s. Note to mods, cud we split where this thread into the economics section.

we have one more "day by day" trading analysis of pakistan. here, on 18th august, this explain how foreign reserve fell down last week. if you read this report 6-7 times, you may understand how trading directly affect rupees-$ value and cause depreciation of Rs when import is high and also decrease foreign reserve at the same time. here inflation also has also some role on trading and rupees value.

sigatoka i work 8 hours every day and have my personal life also. there is nothing like who is winnin and who is loosing. you dont have to reply my all the response. please take some time, go thru some more news then we may talk on other topics related to economics again. thanks



http://www.pakistanbanks.org/career_development/am/articles/rupee_weaker_on_heavy_dollar_buying.html

RUPEE WEAKER ON HEAVY DOLLAR BUYING


IN the inter-bank market, the rupee/dollar parity commenced the week on a mixed note on August 15, after observing a long weekend on account of Independent Day holiday.

On August 15, the rupee weakened slightly versus the dollar in the inter-bank market, shedding one paisa on the selling counter, while making small gains of two paisa on buying counter, to trade at Rs60.30 and Rs60.32. The rupee had closed last week at Rs60.32 and Rs60.33.

On August 16, the rupee did not show any change against the dollar and remained traded at its overnight levels. However, dollars buying by the different banks pushed the rupee down on August 17, as importers rushed for dollars to settle their bills, which have risen due to persistent increase in oil prices. But sufficient dollar supply managed to restrict the fall in rupee value to two paisa. The dollar was quoted at Rs60.32 and Rs60.34 versus the dollar.

On August 18, rupee overnight weakness over the dollar persisted as rising demand for US currency kept the local currency under pressure. In the inter-bank market, the rupee lost three paisa more to trade against the dollar at Rs60.35 and Rs60.37. The higher demand for dollars also pulled the foreign exchange reserves down by $34 million to $12.745 billion last week. This week, the rupee in the inter-bank market lost four paisa versus the dollar.

In the open market, the rupee maintained its weekend levels in terms of dollar changing hands at Rs60.50 and Rs60.55, after it resumed trade on August 15. On the following day the rupee managed to make small advances versus the US currency on its balanced demand and supply position. It recovered three paisa over its overnight levels and traded at Rs60.47 and Rs60.52 on August 16.

On August 17, the rupee extended further gains versus the dollar recovering two paisa, changing hands at Rs60.43 and Rs60.48. The rupee managed to hold firm ground on August 18, gaining another four to trade at Rs60.38 and Rs60.43. During the week in review, the rupee in the open market recovered 12 paisa against the US currency.

Versus the European single common currency, the rupee continued its downward trend and shed 10 paisa, changing hands at Rs76.57 and Rs76.67 on the opening day of the week, against previous weekend’s Rs76.47 and Rs76.57. On August 16, the rupee lost another 20 paisa to trade at Rs76.78 and Rs76.88. The rupee lost 30 paisa more on August 17 and traded at Rs77.12 and Rs77.22 against the euro. This was the third consecutive fall in the rupee value since the resumption of trading activities after a long weekend. The rupee continued easing against the euro on August 18, when it lost 13 paisa more to trade at Rs77.25 and Rs77.35 against the euro. In the entire week the rupee shed 78 paisa against the European currency.

In the international financial market, the dollar pared losses and was little changed against the euro in thin trading on August 14 as "traders" speculated that US inflation data this week could push the Federal Reserve into again lifting interest rates.
The dollar had earlier eased against the euro after data showed the 12-nation eurozone economy grew at its fastest rate in six years, reinforcing the view that the European Central Bank could raise rates again. The euro has gained 7.4 per cent against the dollar this year, while sterling has surged 9.7 per cent against the dollar.

The dollar gained against the yen, but thin summer trade was confined to narrow ranges, as investors looked ahead to US producer price index and US consumer price index data for July to be released later in the week. The euro was little changed at $1.2719 in New York trade, while the dollar was up 0.3 per cent at 116.67 yen. The pound was down 0.1 per cent at $1.8874. The euro was up around 0.3 per cent at 148.43 yen and touched a peak of 148.57 yen, according to Reuters data, just short of a record high hit last week.

Any signs of an acceleration of "inflation" could lead the Fed to raise interest rates again, after pausing in a two-year-long tightening campaign this month,"giving the currency a short-term boost". Last week, the dollar posted its biggest weekly gain in almost a month against a basket of major currencies after a surprisingly strong retail sales report on Friday led some traders to question the view that the economy is slowing. Some analysts said the euro may struggle to extend its gains, since speculators have already ramped up their bets in favour of the euro against the dollar.

Speculators in International Monetary Market currency futures raised their bets on both a stronger euro and sterling to record levels in the week to August 8. The Fed left interest rates on hold at 5.25 per cent last week after raising them 17 straight times, though it kept the door open for more credit tightening if price pressures persist. Fed fund futures show that the market is pricing in a 48 per cent chance that the Fed will raise rates by another quarter percentage point to 5.50 per cent at its next meeting in September.

On August 15, the dollar slid after a survey showed producer prices were softer than expected in July, reinforcing a view that the Federal Reserve may not need to raise interest rates further to combat inflation. The dollar slumped sharply after news the core US Producer Price Index fell 0.3 per cent in July, stripping out volatile food and energy prices, the first monthly decline since October and well below the rise expected by economists.

The euro was up 0.5 per cent in New York at $1.2783. The dollar was down 0.5 per cent at 116.06 yen. The euro was trading at 148.41 yen after touching another record high of 148.62 yen earlier in the session, according to EBS data.

The yen repeatedly plumbed new lows against the euro in past sessions amid signs Japanese economic growth may be slowing and the Bank of Japan is in no hurry to raise interest rates again after the first rise in six years last month.

Sterling gained 0.3 per cent against the dollar to trade at $1.8933. The dollar fell 0.4 per cent to trade at 1.2370 Swiss francs. Adding to the dollar’s woes, a separate survey from the New York Federal Reserve showed manufacturing activity in August slowed to its weakest since June 2005. The market showed little reaction to separate data, showing that the United States attracted a net $75.1 billion of capital inflows in June, more than enough to finance that month’s trade deficit of $64.8 billion.

With other central banks including the European Central Bank expected to raise rates this year, an end to Fed tightening could make it more difficult for the United States to finance its deficit, hurting the dollar. Some market watchers said the dollar’s sell-off after the PPI data could be short-lived, given that consumer price data on Wednesday is expected to point to an uptick in inflation and increase expectations for an interest rate hike.

On August 16, the US dollar fell for a second straight day after a tame report on US inflation reinforced expectations the Federal Reserve will not raise interest rates further. The greenback tumbled to its low for the day after government data showed the core consumer price index, excluding food and energy prices, rose 0.2 per cent in July, below the median forecast of a 0.3 per cent rise in a Reuters poll, and down from a rise of 0.3 per cent last month.

In New York, the euro was up 0.4 per cent against the dollar at $1.2838 from about $1.2790, the level where it was shortly prior to the inflation data. The euro rose as high as $1.2865 on electronic trading system EBS, in sight of a two-month high of $1.2913 reached last week. The dollar also dropped against the yen, trading down 0.2 per cent at 115.84 yen. The euro was trading at 148.75 yen after earlier touching a record peak of 148.89 yen, according to EBS data.

The yen has suffered from expectations that the Bank of Japan will leave interest rates at 0.25 per cent for some time after its first rate rise in six years last month. Sterling hit a 1-1/2 week low against the euro as the Bank of England’s minutes from its last rate-setting meeting suggested there was no rush to repeat this month’s surprise rate rise. The pound made late gains against the dollar, however, as the US currency faced broad pressure on tame US inflation and industrial output data against the dollar, sterling reversed losses made after the BoE minutes as the greenback fell broadly due to tame US July consumer price index data. It last stood up 0.4 per cent at $1.9016.

On August 17, the US dollar recovered some ground, reversing two days of declines, with stronger-than-expected economic data forcing some investors to buy the currency back after selling it short following tame inflation data earlier this week.

The euro was down 0.1 per cent on the day at $1.2827. It was well down from the $1.2870 where it changed hands before the release of the Philly Fed survey, though still within a cent of the two-month peak of $1.2913 reached last week. The dollar was up 0.1 per cent at 115.94 yen, and up 0.3 per cent against the Swiss franc at 1.2325 francs.

Sterling was down 0.6 per cent at $1.8841, under pressure after British retail sales unexpectedly fell in July, adding to losses from August 16, when minutes released of the Bank of England’s last rate-setting meeting suggested the bank was in no hurry to repeat this month’s surprise rate hike to 4.75 per cent. It hit a two-week low against the euro after weak British retail sales increased speculation the Bank of England’s recent surprise rate rise may not be repeated anytime soon. Against the dollar, sterling was steady around $1.8955, after dipping to the day’s low of $1.8934.

At the close of the week on August 18, the dollar recovered against major currencies, moving back towards day highs against the euro and the pound, after falls in the wake of weaker-than-expected US consumer confidence data proved short-lived. The euro dropped to $1.2813 in late European trading, compared with $1.2825 late a day earlier in New York. The dollar stood at 115.82 yen, from 115.92. The pound was particularly weak, falling to 15-day lows against both the dollar and the euro.

Sterling has been on the back foot for much of the week after weaker-than-expected British inflation and retail sales data, as well as slightly dovish Monetary Policy Committee minutes, dampened hopes that the Bank of England will raise interest rates in the autumn. The pound failed to make any headway after data yet again showed very strong levels of both mortgage lending and money supply in Britain, both factors which are likely to worry rate-setters at the BoE. The euro hit a record high against the yen on expectations eurozone interest rates will rise faster than in Japan, while the dollar steadied after strong data helped the US currency to trim losses made earlier in the week. The euro inched up to 148.90 yen on electronic trading platform EBS, its highest level since the single currency was launched in 1999, on expectations that the European Central Bank will keep raising rates after bumping them up to 3 per cent this month.

Sterling hit a two-week low against the euro and the dollar as investors scaled back bets on higher UK interest rates.
 
1. The reason is said to be the widening trade deficit that resulted in massive outflows of foreign assets as well as lower net receipts in external financing.

2. The decline in the central bank's NFA was inline with the volume of its intervention in the forex market to reduce exchange rate volatility, while the decline in scheduled banks' NFA was the outcome of stable exchange rate expectations that led to robust increase in trade-related lending against foreign exchange cir-25 (FE-25) deposits.

1. You are confusing the flows of assets and capital with foreign reserves, foreign reserves are the "assets" held by the central bank not anyone else. I dont disagree with whats written, but what you were and are saying is different from whats written.

2. See, foreign reserves only change when the central banks "intervenes" in the market.
 
1. However, dollars buying by the different banks pushed the rupee down on August 17, as importers rushed for dollars to settle their bills, which have risen due to persistent increase in oil prices. But sufficient dollar supply managed to restrict the fall in rupee value to two paisa.

The higher demand for dollars also pulled the foreign exchange reserves down by $34 million to $12.745 billion last week.

2. Any signs of an acceleration of "inflation" could lead the Fed to raise interest rates again, after pausing in a two-year-long tightening campaign this month,"giving the currency a short-term boost".

1. The foreign reserves fell because the central govt. wished to support the currency by buying ruppees with dollars.

2. The need to control inflation exists outside of anything to do with currency policy. By raising interest rates to control inflation it causes capital to flow in to take advantage of higher returns and thus boosting value of dollar and increasing imports. Ok i accept the fight against inflation can affect the value of the currency.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom