What's new

DRDO ready to deliver AEW&C to Air Force

Ah, how sweet!

Indian coming to help out a fellow Indian
Yes, helping fellowmen might be an alien concept to you, but it's pretty normal behaviour in most parts of the world.

That said, I wasn't helping him - I was asking you a question. Do you have an answer for that? To tell us how you have distinguished yourself on the forum in comparison to him? No?
 
.
Yes, helping fellowmen might be an alien concept to you, but it's pretty normal behaviour in most parts of the world.

That said, I wasn't helping him - I was asking you a question. Do you have an answer for that? To tell us how you have distinguished yourself in comparison to him? No?

I really don't care about you so please go away.
 
.
I really don't care about you so please go away.
LOL. You have answered the question. And also justified that person's characterization of you as a useless troll.

Anyway you are the unwanted presence on the thread, and most of your posts have been nothing but personal attacks. Including this one and the previous one. Clearly it is you who ought to go away, to maintain the quality of the thread. Unless you have something to discuss about the LRSTAR and its sensor package, take your insecurities some place else.

The Bangladesh section might be more suitable for these low quality ramblings.
 
.
LOL. You have answered the question.

Anyway you are the unwanted presence on the thread, and most of your posts have been nothing but personal attacks. Including this one and the previous one. Clearly it is you who ought to go away, to maintain the quality of the thread. Unless you have something to discuss about the LRSTAR and its sensor package, take your insecurities some place else.

The Bangladesh section might be more suitable.

When Indians stay away from BD threads, then I will stay away from Indian threads.

Now run along.

Btw - how is saying I don't care about you a personal attack?
 
.
@gambit : Any idea why there is a normal mode and an extended mode for the radar? (Range in normal mode is 200 kms for fighter sized targets, and range is 300 km in extended mode.) What is the penalty in extended mode?
 
. .
When Indians stay away from BD threads, then I will stay away from Indian threads.

Now run along.

Btw - how is saying I don't care about you a personal attack?
Why would anybody want to stay away from BDF... its the best forum on PDF!!! A look at BDF.....All my stress gone!!!!
 
.
To me it makes sense if you were just doing 3 for globemaster, but would make less sense if you wanted to do maybe 10-15.

Obviously you would need a cheaper to operate variant, but Super hercules would still be better.

But I get it you didn't oeprate it then, what about now, any plans for the next generation AEW based on C-130.

Though I also heard India is working on its own medium transport after Tejas, any truth to this?



KJ-200 is the beam version on a Shanxi Y-8.

KJ-2000 is a AESA radar based on L-76.


The next generation will incorporate new technology from the ZDK-03 designed for Pakistan and from our own naval radars and other radar researches, and it will be based on Y-9.

KJ-500 is the one on top, KJ-200 is on the bottom.

View attachment 95781

KJ-2000
View attachment 95782


KJ-500 and KJ-3000 will make up of the next generation of AEW&C for China, KJ-3000 is the next generation radar most likely based on the new Y-20, whenever that's ready.

Turning a C17 into such aircraft is a waste. Its equivalent to turning a C5 Galaxy into an AWACs plane as well instead of being a transport plane.

IF India wants some which I know they won't since they already made their own, they can buy these.
1c0a79e07e4184b00fbd0f965afaef80.jpg
d22872a8fc568b53a19b16f7e52706ae.jpg
 
.
The specs are for the airborne RADAR.

The extended range is for the 2 m^2 target too.

Not based on the source, since it clearly linked the 200Km only to that size. The extended range surely will have it's limitations, otherwise they would have stated 300Km for that target right away. It can be a different size, or basic detection rather than propper tracking capability, but we might need another source to understand that.
 
.
Not based on the source, since it clearly linked the 200Km only to that size. The extended range surely will have it's limitations, otherwise they would have stated 300Km for that target right away. It can be a different size, or basic detection rather than propper tracking capability, but we might need another source to understand that.
:D
How could they mention 'extended range' and forget 'for a different sized target'?!
I still stand by it.
300 Km for 2 m^2 target.
 
.
:D
How could they mention 'extended range' and forget 'for a different sized target'?!

Who said they forget it? They simply avoided to state a propper figure, which is not surprising, even Saab or Beriev does that, by usually stating detection range for fighter, bomber or naval targets, without giving propper RCS figures.
But you can turn it around too, if it would be 300Km for 2m², why would they bother to reduce it by stating 200Km in the first place? If you have such a capability, you don't sell your product short of that right?
 
.
so can someone tell me how good is this DRDO AWACS in comparrision to other such systems in this theater
 
.
Who said they forget it? They simply avoided to state a propper figure, which is not surprising, even Saab or Beriev does that, by usually stating detection range for fighter, bomber or naval targets, without giving propper RCS figures.
But you can turn it around too, if it would be 300Km for 2m², why would they bother to reduce it by stating 200Km in the first place? If you have such a capability, you don't sell your product short of that right?
IIRC,most RADAR's dont operate at peak o/p.
So that value might be for peak o/p.
 
.
Oh no it is Sandy with another negative rating!

You have proven yourself a petty insecure person.

I pity you. LOL

Interesting to see a Bangladeshi pitying himself.

You quoted your own post.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom