What's new

Don't vote for BJP, it will impose a Hindu CM, Only a Muslim can become CM in J&K: PDP leader

While that is true, it depends on the inhibitions being put forward. That somehow Muslims in Kashmir will suffer under a Hindu BJP CM. This has political misconstruing at its core, but there is historical precedent for it.. and at the same time against it.
The Indian state under the Raj and after it has had some non-muslim leadership in smaller positions who played instrumental roles in providing betterment to the Muslim communities..

At the same time there are clear historical examples where Hindus(and Muslims in a vice-versa example) in positions of power have played a biased role against the Majority or minority Muslim population. It is then therefore usually best to take a leader from the major section of the community at the top and then intersperse it with those from the minority communities in the positions directly beneath them... or as the other alternative.. appoint a Hindu CM but ensure that the majority of his staff and cabinet are Muslim and hence help keep his decisions balanced.
Dude. Why think so much? What suggestions u put forward is infact the recipe for communalism. Afterall, Communalism gets feeded and strengthened when position of power becomes mere victim to what religion he comes from. After all, there is some logic when sahafis and daanishmand people say, Religion and State ought to be kept away. Now for that to happan, religion of an individual shud never be the criteria.

Now as far as Indian democracy is concerned, lets the people decide who they want in power. Problems occur when some go against the desires of common voters for fulfilling personal benefits and propaganda.
 
How am I ruled by a Hindu? We don't recognize your leader as our ruler.
If a cat closes her eyes doesnt mean noone can see her.
What you accept or what you dont doesnt really changes the ground reality little mujahid.
 
Srinagar: In an apparent reference to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which is trying to make inroads in the Jammu and Kashmir, People's Democratic Party (PDP) leader Peer Mansoor has urged the people not to vote for parties, which would impose a Hindu chief minister if elected to power.

Addressing a rally in south Kashmir, PDP MLA Mansoor said that certain parties are trying to forge an alliance with some communal elements and want to impose a Hindu CM in J&K.

He urged the people not to vote for parties which would impose a Hindu CM as it would be a curse on Kashmir.

Mansoor also reportedly said that Kashmir has a Muslim majority and only a person from the same community can rule the state.

Mansoor's controversial statement has drawn a sharp reaction from the BJP, which said that it would file a complaint with the State Election Commission in this regard.

The BJP has also demanded strict action against Mansoor for playing communal card ahead of assembly elections, and said such remarks are not good for the nation's integrity.

Interestingly, PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti had recently said, “The electoral contest is now mainly between PDP and BJP; casting votes for NC or Congress would be a sheer wastage of your power to change.”

Jammu and Kashmir Assembly has 87 seats and will witness five phase elections starting from November 25.

Polling in the hilly state will take place on November 25 for phase 1, December 2 for phase 2, December 9 for phase 3, December 14 for phase 4 and December 20 for phase 5.

Counting of votes for all the five phases will be held on December 23.

Don't vote for BJP, it will impose a Hindu CM in J&K: PDP leader | Zee News

Only a Muslim can become CM in Jammu and Kashmir, says PDP MLA
a-ha... blatant display of insecurity. So..even PDP now realises that there is a chance that BJP may win & form Govt in J & K? This is going to turn entire Jammu & Kashmir situation on it's head!
 
A muslim is born to rule. A Hindu is born to be ruled.
I wont mind to be ruled by a competent P.M. in future and thats where lies the difference of thinking of our thinking.. while you would chant for a corrupt Muslim Leader , I will too chant for a Muslim , but for a competent one.
Mere Sher Bahadur , history has proved , time and again , that "bahadurs" like yourself are picked randomly by NSA and then your people wonder WHY?
 
I wont mind to be ruled by a competent P.M. in future and thats where lies the difference of thinking of our thinking.. while you would chant for a corrupt Muslim Leader , I will too chant for a Muslim , but for a competent one.
Mere Sher Bahadur , history has proved , time and again , that "bahadurs" like yourself are picked randomly by NSA and then your people wonder WHY?
El weirdo. We dictate term to the majority in case you haven't noticed. You will always be ruled by Muslims directly or indirectly/
 
El weirdo. We dictate term to the majority in case you haven't noticed. You will always be ruled by Muslims directly or indirectly/
you are right , you dictate terms , like , which way to pull the Tuk-Tuk when you have a passenger in the back. But thats it!!!

Mujahid , actually I shall name my Parrot that , he wants a freedom from his cage but his master wont allow it , different variants of Jihad i suppose.
 
At the same time, you also have to see that the highlighted parts have a direct effect on the perception of the populous being governed. Whether you do it or not is irrelevant to the perception of the people expecting it. An example could be certain good activities undertaken by NaMo whilst CM of Gujrat during the 2002 riots that would have been beneficial to the Muslims as well.
However, due to the label but on him via his alleged actions.. his good actions are not considered with the same weightage that the actions of someone who may have done nothing much but was from the Muslim community or appeasing to the Muslim(or any community) populous.

sir there are all types of people within the society , there are a large chunk of people within hindu and muslim community who want to slice each others throat , so its not a crime for political parties to be opportunistic here and use these stupids for electoral benefits by adding a 'i am your own' line in their 45 min speech to make these fools happy . But once in office they will have to be fair and responsible to maintain peace no matter what their voters expected from them at the time of vote . We will have to wait for people in our part of the world to become mature enough to understand that merit is the only thing they need to consider while casting their vote . In india during 2014 except hindi belt in most of the states mandate was given for better governance and anti congress for policy paralysis . And point to be noted is a lot of states in the hindi belt are backward and thus communal flare ups , hindutva politics works fine there . It will take some time for people in these region to understand that mandirs and masjids are not going help change their lifes in any way .

a smart man will vote for electricity and water .
 
Tera profile pic wala sher to chuha nikla :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Sardar. Tum log woh sardarjee wala jokes se haqeqaat main dumb ho re. Oye pape apne chote se dimaag ko overwork na kariyo.

Politics hai. MIM knows it will be the largest party in few decades. It has to play its cards well.
 
Sardar. Tum log woh sardarjee wala jokes se haqeqaat main dumb ho re. Oye pape apne chote se dimaag ko overwork na kariyo.

Politics hai. MIM knows it will be the largest party in few decades. It has to play its cards well.

:lol: blah blah blah...are you always this retard?
 
While that is true, it depends on the inhibitions being put forward. That somehow Muslims in Kashmir will suffer under a Hindu BJP CM. This has political misconstruing at its core, but there is historical precedent for it.. and at the same time against it.
The Indian state under the Raj and after it has had some non-muslim leadership in smaller positions who played instrumental roles in providing betterment to the Muslim communities..

At the same time there are clear historical examples where Hindus(and Muslims in a vice-versa example) in positions of power have played a biased role against the Majority or minority Muslim population. It is then therefore usually best to take a leader from the major section of the community at the top and then intersperse it with those from the minority communities in the positions directly beneath them... or as the other alternative.. appoint a Hindu CM but ensure that the majority of his staff and cabinet are Muslim and hence help keep his decisions balanced.

hey Oscar, Hindus are 1/3rd of Jammu and Kashmir's population, its not appropriate to say they don't deserve to become CM of that state.
 
the other
If Abdul Rahman Antulay could be the CM of Maharashtra, Mohammad Koya could be the CM of Kerala, Anowar Taimur could be the CM of Asam then why cant a minority become the CM of J&K? Its up to the people of J&K to decide. Our constitution does not discriminate on the basis of caste, race, religion or language.
 
Sardar. Tum log woh sardarjee wala jokes se haqeqaat main dumb ho re. Oye pape apne chote se dimaag ko overwork na kariyo.

Politics hai. MIM knows it will be the largest party in few decades. It has to play its cards well.

Oh God!!!! You are sooooo dumb yourself you are calling me dumb :partay::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

If a persons identity is judged by his profile pic then we have @ranjeet himself amongst us, not to mension Amitabhh Bachhan as in @shanhensha and also soooo many Jinnahs:woot:

I am not a Punjabbi my dearest friend. :lol:

But whatever you have written shows ur class... perhaps some of our Punjabi friends can help you out @Sidak @Abingdonboy
 
Back
Top Bottom