Don't interfere, Bangladesh tells Pakistan after remark on Mir Quasem Ali hanging

[Abba_Dabba_Jabba]

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...r-quasem-ali-hanging/articleshow/54005672.cms

DHAKA: Bangladesh today summonedPakistan's envoy here to protest its "interference" in the country's internal affairs after Islamabad said it was "deeply saddened" by Jamaat leader and 1971 war criminal Mir Quasem Ali's execution.

Bangladesh Additional Foreign Secretary for Bilateral Affairs Qamrul Ahsan summoned Pakistani High Commissioner Samina Mehtab and protested against the reaction.

"The opinion that Pakistan gave over the execution of Mir Quasem Ali was entirely tantamount to interference in Bangladesh's internal affairs," Ahsan said after the meeting.

Pakistan reacted just an hour after the hanging of the 63-year-old media tycoon last night, the sixth Islamist to be executed for war crimes committed during the 1971 war.

Its Foreign Office said in a statement that Pakistan was "deeply saddened over the execution of the prominent leader... through a flawed judicial process."

Ahsan said he told the Pakistani envoy that Mir Quasem's trial "took place in a very transparent manner, in front of everybody."

"(Mir Quasem) had scopes to appeal against the judgment and he exhausted the scopes. The apex court thought he deserved the punishment what he was handed down as he took part in the genocides in 1971," Ahsan said as having told the envoy.

Officials said the meeting betwen the two senior diplomats lasted for 20 minutes.

"Nothing much to say," Mehtab told reporters after coming out of Ahsan's office.

Mir Quasem was the infamous pro-Pakistani Al-Badr militia's third most important figure. He was convicted of running Al-Badr's torture cell that killed several people.

 

[TheNoob]

boo-fucking-hoo.

What is wrong is wrong.
It doesnt matter whether its internal or external.

 

[Flash_Ninja]

Ahsan said he told the Pakistani envoy that Mir Quasem's trial "took place in a very transparent manner, in front of everybody.

I hope Bengalis don't actually fall for this bullshit.

How is it ever justified to execute a man of such old age?

The crimes he committed were done more than 40 years ago, so really they should have just thrown him in prison, or handed out a verdict much earlier.

 

[That Guy]

I agree, Pakistan shouldn't interfere in India's internal affairs.

 

[Abba_Dabba_Jabba]

I hope Bengalis don't actually fall for this bullshit.

How is it ever justified to execute a man of such old age?

The crimes he committed were done more than 40 years ago, so really they should have just thrown him in prison, or handed out a verdict much earlier.

I thought shariat demands life for a life, it's that simple.

I think he believed in shariat and he faced the trial according to shariat, case closed.

 

[salarsikander]

BUt bangla stands below the tea bags of India in the case against Baluchistan, right ?

 

[That Guy]

I thought shariat demands life for a life, it's that simple.

I think he believed in shariat and he faced the trial according to shariat, case closed.

That's not actually true. While eye for an eye is an option, but alternative methods of punishment and especially forgiveness are highly encouraged.

Also, I don't think you quite understood my previous comment.

I hope Bengalis don't actually fall for this bullshit.

How is it ever justified to execute a man of such old age?

The crimes he committed were done more than 40 years ago, so really they should have just thrown him in prison, or handed out a verdict much earlier.

If India wants to execute its own people, why bother arguing? It would be better if Pakistan stays away from commenting on Indian affairs.

 

[Abba_Dabba_Jabba]

That's not actually true. While eye for an eye is an option, but alternative methods of punishment and especially forgiveness are highly encouraged.

Also, I don't think you quite understood my previous comment.

I did, and thought it was funny in sarcastic way.

 

[H!TchHiker]

They can interfere in Balochistan for which they have nothing to do. This is legitimate for paksitan to speak out .It was decided at that time they will not vindicate people.

 

[Pandora]

Convicting people based on rumours and personal hatred yeah sure its a fair trial.

 

[Flash_Ninja]

I thought shariat demands life for a life, it's that simple.

I think he believed in shariat and he faced the trial according to shariat, case closed.

Forgiveness is highly encouraged, also he should be subject to secular law, why would he be tried under shariah law?

Pakistan at the time of war was a secular country long before Zia Ul Haq islamified the country, so he was acting on behalf of Pakistan rather than Shariah law or Islam.

 

[That Guy]

I did, and thought it was funny in sarcastic way.

Ah, good. I don't like explaining my jokes.

 

[Tamilnadu]

why is Pakistan's heros everone else villains....

 

[M_Saint]

I hope Bengalis don't actually fall for this bullshit.

How is it ever justified to execute a man of such old age?

The crimes he committed were done more than 40 years ago, so really they should have just thrown him in prison, or handed out a verdict much earlier.

The crimes he committed were done more than 40 years ago, so really they should have just thrown him in prison, or handed out a verdict much earlier.

He was falsely accused; convicted by paid dalals and premeditatedly murdered by judicial means thus it was judicial killing all in all. So, please don't comment on things that you don't have full knowledge and understanding of it. And I'VE gone over almost all the cases against JI leaders to tell you that every single one is a pack of lie, damn lie, malaunic/benya lie to the fullest. Finally, hardly anyone in this board has complete grasp of JI leader's judicial killings and if you want to know please look for neutral, authentic sources, thanks.

 

[war&peace]

I agree, Pakistan shouldn't interfere in India's internal affairs.

But but but it is Bangladesh...the independent country ... its has a flag and a PM and a map..it is independent