Does religion make Muslims more violent?

[BDforever]

I have a friend who is a Jain,who eats non veg and let me tell you he is very aggressive(nothing comes from his mouth other than bc and mc )

And as I said it depends from person to person
There are some Muslims who are peace loving and there are Hindus who are more aggressive

for this we should blame jain lol

 

[wolfschanzze]

because you keep the tag Muslim with it

Like i said another will naturally look at you from a viewpoint,
1) where does he come from?
2)What Religion ,Community,Race,Nation do they are affiliated to.You can't wish these away that is how human beings see it.
3)The answers only you have to find within yourself and bring reforms.Because those who commit such attacks do so in the name of your religion justifying them with Divine Sanction from your book.

4)The need to show your religion as superior and not equal as others, is where the problems arise, since the so called "Terrorists" you speak of use that same logic that their religion is superior to others and justify using violence and other methods on others.

 

[utraash]

as usual lol


like hindusim ?

The topic we have is not Hinduism otherwise I would have certainly replied.... Lets stick to topic ......
Can you deny what I quoted ?

 

[BDforever]

How is it contradictory at all? Knowing what makes him tick is very different from giving two hoots to why it makes him tick that way. I do not want to reform him. Or the environment that spawns him. I am not a reformer here. I am a man who wants to live. And for that I need to kill him. And for that I need to know everything about him.

So again. Why is it not important for me to know his religion and identify him with his religion? Because thats what he wants me to do? I don't care. Its not a priority for me.

I can see how it might be a priority for others though. Coreligionists for instance. Again, that's their cross to bear. Pardon the pun.



I know mine. No Adam there.

1. you don't want to know his motive but you want to fight against him, you can't fight without knowing his motive, what is why we all are still failing.
2. so you don't know christianity ? then don't claim something about it

 

[jamahir]

How ?

1. jainism is not some socialistic belief that got rid of india's oppressive family and social culture... it continued those.

2. it was a jain monk who convinced chandragupta maurya to commit suicide by voluntary starvation... that is murder... that monk was a murderer yet that is insanely celebrated.

 

[BDforever]

Like i said another will naturally look at you from a viewpoint,
1) where does he come from?
2)What Religion ,Community,Race,Nation do they are affiliated to.You can't wish these away that is how human beings see it.
3)The answers only you have to find within yourself and bring reforms.Because those who commit such attacks do so in the name of your religion justifying them with Divine Sanction from your book.

problem is lack in analytical ability and generalization.

The topic we have is not Hinduism otherwise I would have certainly replied.... Lets stick to topic ......
Can you deny what I quoted ?

no it is part of discussion

 

[Mujahid Memon]

I dont like the title of this thread.
No religion supports violence, and if violence is what Islam was about then scores of muslims would not have shunned terrorist activists that take place in the name jihad, neither would have muslim countries boycotted Islamic state.
Extremists exist in every religion!

But muslims should stop comparing their religion with other religions and stop trying to prove that their religion is better.

Why not,unlike other religions, Islam is better in that way that it teaches us to persecute every criminal equally, indiscriminative of religion, race, or gender.

 

[utraash]

I have a friend who is a Jain,who eats non veg and let me tell you he is very aggressive(nothing comes from his mouth other than bc and mc )

And as I said it depends from person to person
There are some Muslims who are peace loving and there are Hindus who are more aggressive

But again % of such ppl will be minimal in Jainism comparing to others n I have met some good no of jainis none are non vegie.....

 

[wolfschanzze]

problem is lack in analytical ability and generalization.


no it is part of discussion

Problem is lack in ability or denial to understand the rot within and take countermeasures to remove the rot within.Like i said, if you are in a "All is well" then nothing can help.

Problem is with , The need to show your religion as superior and not equal as others, is where the problems arise, since the so called "Terrorists" you speak of use that same logic that their religion is superior to others and justify using violence and other methods on others.

 

[doppelganger]

1. you don't want to know his motive but you want to fight against him, you can't fight without knowing his motive, what is why we all are still failing.

We are failing because the gloves have not come off properly yet. Because many around the world still hope the rest of you will be able to pull things back, and therefore hesitate.

I believe we are nearing the end of that confusion and hesitation. Globally.

2. so you don't know christianity ? then don't claim something about it

I know enough about it to know that they do not believe that Adam was a Muslim, as claimed by Muslims. Which was the limited point I made. A point you incidentally agreed to.

Which was followed by me pointing out that a larger number of people in this world do not believe Adam was Muslim than do. And the faith they believe in was born by the birth of their prophet about 7 centuries before yours, the youngest major world religion, was born by the birth of yours.

 

[Bang Galore]

Like i said another will naturally look at you from a viewpoint,
1) where does he come from?
2)What Religion ,Community,Race,Nation do they are affiliated to.You can't wish these away that is how human beings see it.
3)The answers only you have to find within yourself and bring reforms.Because those who commit such attacks do so in the name of your religion justifying them with Divine Sanction from your book.

It is less about what all the affiliations they may have, more about what particular cause motivates them and what they are fighting for. For example, the religion of a LTTE terrorist was irrelevant, his/her cause was based on linguistic nationalism. Whether he is a Hindu or christian did not matter. Nor does religion matter in the war against the maoists. When people fight in the name of Islam or of a sect thereof, it is necessary to understand the people fighting to be able to deal with them. Clubbing them in the same class together with all other terrorist groups may be politically more acceptable to some but won't help much in a fight against them.

 

[utraash]

problem is lack in analytical ability and generalization.


no it is part of discussion

N I don't think so, now discuss with ghost...
Quote me in relevant thread I will certainly answer you..... Stick to topic else don't qoute me.....

 

[45'22']

But again % of such ppl will be minimal in Jainism comparing to others n I have met some good no of jainis none are non vegie.....

Hence goes my first comment
the most violent are Muslims and least are Buddhist acc to me
you can say that Jains are least violent but I won't be able to comment bcuz I haven't met too many of them
maybe you are right

 

[BDforever]

Problem is lack in ability or denial to understand the rot within and take countermeasures to remove the rot within.Like i said, if you are in a "All is well" then nothing can help.

Problem is with , The need to show your religion as superior and not equal as others, is where the problems arise, since the so called "Terrorists" you speak of use that same logic that their religion is superior to others and justify using violence and other methods on others.

bold part: is not all religious do ?
and first para, i agree but both are true

N I don't think so, now discuss with ghost...
Quote me in relevant thread I will certainly answer you..... Stick to topic else don't qoute me.....

yes it is

I know enough about it to know that they do not believe that Adam was a Muslim, as claimed by Muslims. Which was the limited point I made. A point you incidentally agreed to.

Which was followed by me pointing out that a larger number of people in this world do not believe Adam was Muslim than do. And the faith they believe in was born by the birth of their prophet about 7 centuries before yours, the youngest major world religion, was born by the birth of yours.

no you don't know. just random claim.

 

[Turkish_FR]

Those Muslims don't really represent the teaching of Islam.

I dont know the issue or what you were replying, I didnt read the OP. I just plugged to your post;

How a person who doesnot represents the teachings of Islam could be called as "Muslim" ? So in this case, what makes them Muslims ? : )