Does religion make Muslims more violent?

[wolfschanzze]

i am not justifing them, i am telling stop calling them muslim or hindus or christians, that is what they want to hear, they are attention seeker.
start calling them terrorist. then they will lose ground.

But it seems to me that calling them "Terrorist" and them losing ground is not working at all,instead they are growing and recruiting more and more.
First raise your voice as a moderate, oppose those fatwas and your mullah clerics, as long as you are obedient and follow them,then no matter how much Terrorist Name calling you do, won't work.
Your Community has to find the answer within themselves and nobody can help in this matter.
That can only happen by Reform,but the question is are you willing to reform your religion and community?
Till then, the opinions of others will keep getting from bad to worse.

 

[ito]

As I have said, do research and refute Professor's theory. That is how things work in academia. Taking cheap shots and making hollow claims don't cut nothing.

BTW, the work is fully described in his paper here: http://polisci.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/people/u3833/IslamAndLargeScalePoliticalViolence.pdf. This is a peer reviewed publication. If you are eager to use your brain properly, I'll suggest you go through the work and identify weaknesses in the methodology, results, and conclusion. Hopefully we will take your words seriously after that.

I refuted his study saying why the conclusion draw from his research is flawed. It is you who is taking cheap shots and making hollow claims that don't cut anything. Can you tell me why his conclusion are not flawed, apart from saying that the study has come from UC Berkeley professor hence correct.

tell you right and wrong.

There is law to tell you that.

 

[syedali73]

I refuted his study saying why the conclusion draw from his research is flawed. It is you who is taking cheap shots and making hollow claims that don't cut anything. Can you tell me why his conclusion are not flawed, apart from saying that the study has come from UC Berkeley professor hence correct.

@WebMaster @Horus @Jango Please take notice of this troll. He is provided with the link to the actual work and instead of finding flaws in the work, he is shooting arrows in the dark and attempting to derail the thread.

 

[BDforever]

Why should I be bothered about his motivations? I just want to know who he is so I can kill him. His faith gives me a lt of information. It is critical to my fight against him and the environment that spawns him.



And the Christians came 700 years before your faith did. And a few thousand years after the really old ones were born.

1. bold part: contradictory lol
2. first know one particular religion then claim something

But it seems to me that calling them "Terrorist" and them losing ground is not working at all,instead they are growing and recruiting more and more.
First raise your voice as a moderate, oppose those fatwas and your mullah clerics, as long as you are obedient and follow them,then no matter how much Terrorist Name calling you do, won't work.
Your Community has to find the answer within themselves and nobody can help in this matter.
That can only happen by Reform,but the question is are you willing to reform your religion and community?
Till then, the opinions of others will keep getting from bad to worse.

because you keep the tag Muslim with it

 

[jamahir]

thread is derailed.

 

[BDforever]

There is law to tell you that.

and how the law came ?

 

[utraash]

I think muslims 're equally peaceful but what makes me queasy is when somebody tries to prove that their religion is better than the rest, whether its islam, christianity or others.

But there are evidence of supremacist ideology being a follower of that particular religion in the holiest books ....Though nothing can be perfect in this world...... These particular ideology perpetuated in order to justify the killing of other believers from past to present....

 

[BDforever]

thread is derailed.

as usual lol

But there are evidence of supremacist ideology being a follower of that particular religion in the holiest books ....Though nothing can be perfect in this world...... These particular ideology perpetuated in order to justify the killing of other believers from past to present....

like hindusim ?

 

[ito]

@WebMaster @Horus @Jango Please take notice of this troll. He is provided with the link to the actual work and instead of finding flaws in the work, he is shooting arrows in the dark and attempting to derail the thread.

Cry baby...I am not afraid of getting banned. Call others mods too.

 

[45'22']

Jainism.... ? I have yet to meet a jaini who eats non veg while Buddhist do ....

I have a friend who is a Jain,who eats non veg and let me tell you he is very aggressive(nothing comes from his mouth other than bc and mc )

And as I said it depends from person to person
There are some Muslims who are peace loving and there are Hindus who are more aggressive

 

[mujhaidind]

those claimers of muslim fellowship who do violence obviously are only following wrong non-islami cultural ideas and their own criminal tendencies... but i also blame the western governments who purposely project these criminals as "muslim"... whenever bbc wants to show palestine, they show post-2007 gaza filled with burqa/mullah types, never they show normal muslims in the "west bank" part.

It is both religion of peace and violence.

 

[utraash]

and jainism is cruel with humans.

How ?

 

[ito]

and how the law came ?

However it might have come. It is much better than old concept of so called 'religion'.

 

[BDforever]

However it might have come. It is much better than old concept of so called 'religion'.

again it is your believe lol

 

[doppelganger]

1. bold part: contradictory lol

How is it contradictory at all? Knowing what makes him tick is very different from giving two hoots to why it makes him tick that way. I do not want to reform him. Or the environment that spawns him. I am not a reformer here. I am a man who wants to live. And for that I need to kill him. And for that I need to know everything about him.

So again. Why is it not important for me to know his religion and identify him with his religion? Because thats what he wants me to do? I don't care. Its not a priority for me.

I can see how it might be a priority for others though. Coreligionists for instance. Again, that's their cross to bear. Pardon the pun.

2. first know one particular religion then claim something

I know mine. No Adam there.