AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS

- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of PakistanDo we need the Federal Shariat Court?
The attorney general of Pakistan, Justice (Retd) Malik Abdul Qayyum, has said something that even his detractors in the country may not disagree with. He says all the add-on judicial institutions are redundant and can be done away with if the present judicial structure is revamped and strengthened. Why have special terrorist courts if you can expand the judiciary and let it handle terrorism? We create additional courts because we dont want to set the mainstream system right. Therefore there is nothing the Federal Shariat Court does that cant be done by the High Courts and the Supreme Court.
Love of religion blinded the nation to the actual intent of General Zia-ul-Haq when he created the Federal Shariat Court through his infamous 8th Amendment. This was the closed house where he could plant his unwanted judges and let them rot. Any judge could be asked by the president to report at the Federal Shariat Court and cool his heels there if he was not subservient to the military dictator. Parliament has already moved, albeit partially, to do away with the Hudood mounted by General Zia; it can also do away with the Federal Shariat Court and spend the good money thus saved on improving the current judicial infrastructure. *
It would be wonderful if we were able to abolish all these tacked on institutions that create confusion and redundancy, but I doubt that any political party has the guts to actually do this, considering the thuggery of the so called "protectors of Islam".