So you are a Qadiani....... interesting
Read this Ayah of quran
Discussing theology isn`t allowed here , but I will give you just a few examples :
Hazrat Mulla Ali Qari (mercy of Allah be upon him), who died in 1014 A.H. and was a great research scholar and a master of Hanafi jurisprudence and was a great Imam, has stated in his book Mauzuat Kabir, with reference to the saying of the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him:
Had Ibrahim (the Holy Prophet's infant son) survived, he would have been a true prophet, that if Ibrahim had survived and had become a prophet he would still have been a follower of the Holy Prophet; and he has interpreted the verse (33:40) as meaning that there would be no prophet after the Holy Prophet who would abrogate his law and who would not be one of his followers.
In the same way, Hazrat Shah Waliullah, Muhaddas of Delhi (mercy of Allah be upon him), who has been acclaimed as the Reformer of the 12th century of Islam, has stated in his book Tafheemat IIahiyyah:
The prophets came to an end with the Holy Prophet, meaning that there can be no divinely inspired reformer after him who would be commissioned by Allah, the Glorious, with a new law.
Thus there can be a difference in the interpretation of the verse, but so far as faith in the verse is concerned it is not open to any doubt that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed had full faith in it , as per Ahmadiyya belief
The verse is as follows:
Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the
Seal of the Prophets. Allah has full knowledge of all things. (33:40)
Lol either you are mistaken or you are lying on purpose? Half of my family is twelver so I know they do not believe such a thing
I know what I am talking about my friend ... do some research on it