What's new

DNA of Indonesian/Chinese/Japanese/Northen Indian/Southern Indian/Bengali and others

.
So this is why only Chinese, Korean, and Japanese are considered east asian.

East Asian is defined differently by some, actually I am confused.

In general, East Asian = South East Asian and North East Asian. Some part of China is actually part of South East Asian (South China).

Indonesian is also vary, same with other South East Asian region.

This is part of my relatives which are West Sumatran in origin
 
Last edited:
.
East Asian is defined differently by some, actually I am confused.

In general, East Asian = South East Asian and North East Asian. Some part of China is actually part of South East Asian (South China).

Indonesian is also vary, same with other South East Asian region.

This is part of my relatives which are West Sumatran in origin

View attachment 776121

View attachment 776122
Looks can be deceiving nowadays with cosmetic products but DNA doesn't lie. Korea, Japan, and Chinese has much more similar DNA then the rest of the world. Basically thousands of years of intermingling of people between China, Korea, and Japan made the area pretty homogenous.
 
.
Looks can be deceiving nowadays with cosmetic products but DNA doesn't lie. Korea, Japan, and Chinese has much more similar DNA then the rest of the world. Basically thousands of years of intermingling of people between China, Korea, and Japan made the area pretty homogenous.

If you are talking about my female relative, I have known her since she is little and without make up, she is really pretty, she is an entrepreneur now, following her father step but making different business that is fit with her passion.
 
.
If you are talking about my female relative, I have known her since she is little and without make up, she is really pretty, she is an entrepreneur now, following her father step but making different business that is fit with her passion.
I was mainly talking about China, Korea, and Japan. As for Indonesia, and south east Asian countries in general, the population is much more heterogeneous and each individual person will look different depending on their ansestry.
 
.
1653541835290.png

1653541803732.png


North, East and West India carry Haplogroup R1A as their main Y-DNA. Southern Indians carry both Haplogroup L and R1A as their main Y-DNA.

MTDNA M in India:

1653541898203.png
 
.
View attachment 848013
View attachment 848012

North, East and West India carry Haplogroup R1A as their main Y-DNA. Southern Indians carry both Haplogroup L and R1A as their main Y-DNA.

MTDNA M in India:

View attachment 848014
L is the haplogroup associated with the Indus valley civilization if I'm not wrong. Then it proves that lots of indus valley residents migrated to south India as is usually stated.
Also shouldn't East India have some haplogroup O in there, showing the east/southeast asian influence?
 
.
L is the haplogroup associated with the Indus valley civilization if I'm not wrong. Then it proves that lots of indus valley residents migrated to south India as is usually stated.
Also shouldn't East India have some haplogroup O in there, showing the east/southeast asian influence?

Maybe the graph is specifically about "Indian" where part of Tibet that is included by British is excluded in the picture

Talking about halogroup O

1653545582147.png


The graph in here is the best that I can find about human migration but not perfect as they dont show the migration of Austronesian from Taiwan into maritime South East Asia

1653545146885.png
 
.
Maybe the graph is specifically about "Indian" where part of Tibet that is included by British is excluded in the picture

Talking about halogroup O

View attachment 848028

The graph in here is the best that I can find about human migration but not perfect as they dont show the migration of Austronesian from Taiwan into maritime South East Asia

View attachment 848026
This map is showing O haplogroup present in east India, could be the assimilation was less towards the paternal and more towards the maternal side and hence is less when taken as percentages in y haplogroup, where R1a and H form the majority.
 
.
DNA map

From this map it shows Turkish DNA is more Middle Easterners. Close DNA is shown by the color, some part of Pakistan, Middle Eastern still has close relation with Europe (Caucasian).

South East Asian, North East Asian, Central Asian, and Native American has close relation

Indian is not regarded as Caucasian in here, green color is basically different with blue (Caucasian) while they think they are part of Caucasian DNA

1664292773546.png
 
Last edited:
.
DNA map

From this map it shows Turkish DNA is more Middle Easterners

View attachment 883023
No dear central asia is most turkic..(Orange )

View attachment 848013
View attachment 848012

North, East and West India carry Haplogroup R1A as their main Y-DNA. Southern Indians carry both Haplogroup L and R1A as their main Y-DNA.

MTDNA M in India:

View attachment 848014
Language is a totally different silo.
We can not judge genetics based on that
 
Last edited:
.
No dear central asia is most turkic..(Orange )


Languages is a totally different silo.
We can not judge genetics based on that

Orange is close to yellow, it is clear Central Asian is Mongoloid. Real Turkic is Mongoloid

That map is not about language, if we are talking about language the map will be different, Austronesian language for example is clearly different with Thailand, Vietnam, and South China language
 
.
Orange is close to yellow, it is clear Central Asian is Mongoloid. Real Turkic is Mongoloid
Yes.The gokturks came from present day Mongolia. The Turk culture is different from mongol but they are same family.

That map is not about language, if we are talking about language the map will be different, Austronesian language for example is clearly different with Thailand, Vietnam, and South China language
I was talking about the indo aryan language map
 
.
Yes.The gokturks came from present day Mongolia. The Turk culture is different from mongol but they are same family.


I was talking about the indo aryan language map

Ok, yup, sorry. Ya I think Indo Aryan messing up India since I believe they are small invader that later conquer India and impose their language, the same like Turkish where the origin comes from Central Asia (Mongoloid).

For Austronesian, the language similarity really show Genetic make up.

This is Austronesian from Taiwan that really look Indonesian

 
.
This map is showing O haplogroup present in east India, could be the assimilation was less towards the paternal and more towards the maternal side and hence is less when taken as percentages in y haplogroup, where R1a and H form the majority.

That is really logic to see something like this when you see the close border line
 
.
Back
Top Bottom