What's new

Divotee donated 108 kg gold to Somnath temple. Aspires to donate above 1000 kg gold for cherity.

Sanghi stories are always fascinating to read. Every time you think that it cannot get more stupider than that, some one is always there to prove you wrong.

The manuscript he mentions speaks about an Indian King who embraced Islam.

Read all about it.


Bharati trolls are getting desparate posting stupid stories and conjuctures.

Hire a bollywood script writer to write better stories for call center trolls.
 
.
Wouldn't be surprised if that 108kg turned out to be 0.108kg :rofl:
Well someone's gonna get hurt real bad if it turns out to be 100gram not 100kilo.

People of Somnath should be careful about this Sindhi gold.

Maybe it is magical and can shrink itself in size at the sight of an Afghan Turk. Who knows, let's go and find out
 
.
You stupid Moron. There is no mention of those idols being smuggled to India from the Manuscript you mentioned.

Atleast read before posting from fake Sanghi twitter stories dumbass.

Always embrassing yourself and getting exposed posting fake conjectures and make belief stories.

And when did YOU read it ? In the time I introduced you to that book and now ?

Talk about embarrassing yourself. :lol:
 
.
And when did YOU read it ? In the time I introduced you to that book and now ?

Talk about embarrassing yourself. :lol:

How am I embarrassing myself exposing you lying with your dhoti down?:lol:

There is no book which you posted as a manuscript:lol: you fool,as usual you have to lie to hide your pathetic dhoti from being ripped apart.

Your chaddi exposed itself when you said Idols being smuggled to India and that too in Somnath Mandir:lol::lol::lol:.
 
Last edited:
.
That link is not authentic and will not give you access to the actual book.

So its pretty clear you have not read it.

The story goes something like this,

when the prophet smashed the idols at Kaaba, the image of Manat was missing: it had been secreted away, and sent in a trading ship to a port-town in India called Prabhas, which imported Arab horses. According to this belief, idol-worshippers built a temple to Manat , and renamed the place to So-Manat, or somnath.

SO whatever you quote is Authentic but when we expose your filthy lies its not Authentic....Right.

WHAT is the name of the book you keep mentioning you stupid troll. You copy pasted the Nonsense from this twiter



No Reference whats so ever and when I posted the link to the real story you get gobsmacked because obviously chaddi is exposed.

So where did you pull this story about the Idol being smuggled to India from ? Your rear?


The Arab historian Farrukhi Sistani , contemporary of Mahmud Ghazni , also wrote that the idol at Somnath was not of an Hindu deity but of a pre-Islamic Arabic Goddess Manat. The descriptions of the idol of Manat was that it was aniconic block of black stone.

Now the shiv Linga of Somnath was also made of Black stone and was of strong magnetic properties that made it float in mid air.

Another Bollywood Script from Bharatis :lol:

Because the Idol is called MANNAT hence SO- MANNAT which became SOMMNATH :lol:....whats next? Kangana Ranaut doing an Item Number to please you Chaddis?:lol:

You are pathetic.

I have provided the source and the brief story and another ARab historian reference.

All you have provided is a Fake link that does not even lead to the book that is referenced.

So let me get this Straight ...You Posted " ACCORDING TO AN ARAB DOCUMENT FROM QISSAT SHAKARWATI FARMAD --- The Idol of Mannat was secretly stolen and brough to India"..

Since you love Wikipedia so much ... Lets Wikipedia it.

oh Look what I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qissat_Shakarwati_Farmad <--- BHARATI LUNGI MUST BE ON FIRE NOW.

So much for your brief reference and Stories Chaddi. You been Caught lying with your Chaddi down AGAIN.

Read - - From, Shade of Swords: Jihad and the conflict between Islam and Christianity By M.J Akbar.

" She was one of the goddesses Prophet Muhammed once said could be worshipped, but then retracted, claiming that the assertion was influenced by Satan. The reference to Manat is contained in the so-called Satanic Verses, subsequently deleted from the Quran.

A good place for a historian of Islam to start would be 629 ad, or Year 8 of the new Muslim calendar, though that had yet to come into being. In that year, 20 armed horsemen, led by Sa'd ibn Zayd, were sent by Muhammad to destroy the statue of Manat, the pagan goddess of fate, at Qudayd, on the road between Mecca and Medina. For eight years Muhammad had tolerated the uneasy coexistence of the pagan male god Allah and his three daughters: al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat. Al-Uzza (the morning star, Venus) was the favourite goddess of the Quraysh, the tribe to which Muhammad belonged, but Manat was the most popular in the region as a whole, and was idolised by three key Meccan tribes that Muhammad had been desperately trying to win over to his new monotheistic religion. By Year 8, however, three important military victories had been won against rival pagan and Jewish forces. The Battle of Badr had seen Muhammad triumph against the Meccan tribes despite the smallness of his army. The tribes had been impressed by the muscularity of the new religion, and Muhammad must have deemed further ideological compromise unnecessary. Sa'd ibn Zayd and his 20 horsemen had arrived to enforce the new monotheism.

The keeper of Manat's sanctuary saw the horsemen approach, but remained silent as they dismounted. No greetings were exchanged. Their demeanour indicated that they had not come to honour Manat or to leave a token offering. The keeper didn't stand in their way. According to Islamic tradition, as Sa'd ibn Zayd approached the beautifully carved statue of Manat, a naked black woman seemed to emerge from nowhere. The keeper called out: 'Come, O Manat, show the anger of which you are capable!' Manat began to pull out her hair and beat her breasts in despair, while cursing her tormentors. Sa'd beat her to death. Only then did his 20 companions join him. Together they hacked away until they had destroyed the statue. The sanctuaries of al-Lat and al-Uzza were dealt with in similar fashion, probably on the same day.

A seventh-century prophet could not become the true spiritual leader of a tribal community without exercising political leadership and, in the Peninsula, mastering the basics of horsemanship, sword-play and military strategy. Muhammad had understood the need to delay the final breach with polytheism until he and his companions were less isolated. However, once the decision to declare a strict monotheism was taken, no concessions were granted. The Christian Church had been forced into a permanent compromise with its pagan forebears, allowing its new followers to worship a woman who had conceived a child by God. Muhammad, too, could have picked one of Allah's daughters to form part of a new constellation - this might even have made it easier to attract recruits - but factional considerations acted as a restraint: a new religious party had to distinguish itself forcefully from Christianity, its main monotheistic rival, while simultaneously marginalising the appeal of contemporary paganism. The oneness of a patriarchal Allah appeared the most attractive option, essential not only to demonstrate the weakness of Christianity, but also to break definitively with the dominant cultural practices of the Peninsula Arabs, with their polyandry and their matrilinear past. Muhammad himself had been the third and youngest husband of his first wife, Khadija, who died three years before the birth of the Islamic calendar.

Historians of Islam, following Muhammad's lead, would come to refer to the pre-Islamic period as the jahiliyya ('the time of ignorance'), but the influence of its traditions should not be underestimated. For the pre-Islamic tribes, the past was the preserve of poets, who also served as historians, blending myth and fact in odes designed to heighten tribal feeling. The future was considered irrelevant, the present all-important. One reason for the tribes' inability to unite was that the profusion of their gods and goddesses helped to perpetuate divisions and disputes whose real origins often lay in commercial rivalries.



And where does this say the Statue of Mannat was smuggled to India?? :lol::lol::lol:

Sorry Chaddi...You been Posting Nonsense out of Nonsense and you keep getting exposed!! Must be embarrassing for your hindu lungi to keep up with propaganda.

PS! The Highlighted Part is the JOkE OF THE CENTURY!!!
 
Last edited:
.
Rubbish. The wealth of the temple was looted the first few times itself. After than the raids were pretty pointless as far as wealth was concerned.

He raided it 16 times between 1025 and 1029. That is 4 times in One year. It was clearly not for its wealth , but for something else.

The Temple of Somnath is so ancient that it is mentioned in the Rig Veda, Skand puran, Shreemad Bhagvatam, and Shiv puran .

Which means that Somnath as a pilgrimage site is between 10,000 to 7,000 years old.

So as a child returns to the mother during times of trouble, it is only natural that the surviving deities of Arabia found it way to somnath. Same as the migration of the Jews, Syrian christians and the Parsis into India. And now the Tibetians, Tamil refugees and Rohingya refugees.

You have developed some feel good wishful thinking. Maybe they were coming for devadasis and Kama Sutra practicing Hindu women. But I am sure they were not coming for some broken piece of stone.

So you are saying India is the mother of all deities?
 
.
SO whatever you quote is Authentic but when we expose your filthy lies its not Authentic....Right.

WHAT is the name of the book you keep mentioning you stupid troll. You copy pasted the Nonsense from this twiter


No Reference whats so ever and when I posted the link to the real story you get gobsmacked because obviously chaddi is exposed.

So where did you pull this story about the Idol being smuggled to India from ? Your rear?


How do you know I am not True Indology you dumbass ?

You link does not even have the Qissat Shakarwati Farmad, it only has the synopsis of that book by Friedman :lol: . Bet you did not know that.

I have quoted the actual section from the QIssat that speaks about the origin of the myth.


Another Bollywood Script from Bharatis :lol:

Because the Idol is called MANNAT hence SO- MANNAT which became SOMMNATH :lol:....whats next? Kangana Ranaut doing an Item Number to please you Chaddis?:lol:

Its not me who is saying that you idiot, its the Arabic Manuscript which makes that Claim.

For the Arabs, Somnath appeared to be linked to "Manat", For Hindus "SomNath" was always "Lord of the Moon". "Som = Moon", Nath = Lord or Master".


So let me get this Straight ...You Posted " ACCORDING TO AN ARAB DOCUMENT FROM QISSAT SHAKARWATI FARMAD --- The Idol of Mannat was secretly stolen and brough to India"..

Since you love Wikipedia so much ... Lets Wikipedia it.

oh Look what I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qissat_Shakarwati_Farmad <--- BHARATI LUNGI MUST BE ON FIRE NOW.

So much for your brief reference and Stories Chaddi. You been Caught lying with your Chaddi down AGAIN.

LOL. The QIssat Shakarwati Farmad STARTS in the city of Mecca before the Hijra. It starts with the story of Muhammed trying to convince the members of his tribe of the validity of his claim that he was a prophet. The story details happening of that time including the raid to Meccca to destroy the idols.

The story of Perumal seeing the splitting of the Moon comes MUCH later.


It is pretty clear you have NEVER read the QIssat or you would not be making such absurd posts :lol:



And where does this say the Statue of Mannat was smuggled to India?? :lol::lol::lol:

Sorry Chaddi...You been Posting Nonsense out of Nonsense and you keep getting exposed!! Must be embarrassing for your hindu lungi to keep up with propaganda.

PS! The Highlighted Part is the JOkE OF THE CENTURY!!!

I am quoting the various Arab histories regarding the Manat. All of them from ARAB Historians and Arab Manuscripts.

You are the joke here.
You have developed some feel good wishful thinking. Maybe they were coming for devadasis and Kama Sutra practicing Hindu women. But I am sure they were not coming for some broken piece of stone.

So you are saying India is the mother of all deities?

India is the MOTHER of ALL civilizations. And Genetics has just proved it conclusively.

Deities are just a small part of that.
 
Last edited:
.
How do you know I am not True Indology you dumbass ?

You link does not even have the Qissat Shakarwati Farmad, it only has the synopsis of that book by Friedman :lol: . Bet you did not know that.

I have quoted the actual section from the QIssat that speaks about the origin of the myth.

Who the EFF cares uf your True Indology or Not. You definately shared that piece of garbage from that twitter account.

You Quoted the actual section from your rear!!! NO WHERE can that section of the IDOL MANNAT BEING SECRETLY SMUGGLED TO INDIA IS AVAILABLE FROM QISSAT.

As Always your fantasies cannot be considered FACTS.

Its not me who is saying that you idiot, its the Arabic Manuscript which makes that Claim.

For the Arabs, Somnath appeared to be linked to "Manat", For Hindus "SomNath" was always "Lord of the Moon". "Som = Moon", Nath = Lord or Master".

There is NO ARABIC MANUSCRIPT making that claim you stupid fool. YOU Made that claim and tried to link it with that arabic Manuscript you lying piece of garbage.

Nice story about Somnath and Moon and Lord of Master <---Again STOP pulling Stories from your REAR. We are NOT INTERESTED in your BS Fantasies.


LOL. The QIssat Shakarwati Farmad STARTS in the city of Mecca before the Hijra. It starts with the story of Muhammed trying to convince the members of his tribe of the validity of his claim that he was a prophet. The story details happening of that time including the raid to Meccca to destroy the idols.

The story of Perumal seeing the splitting of the Moon comes MUCH later.


It is pretty clear you have NEVER read the QIssat or you would not be making such absurd posts :lol:

We Know where the Story QISSAT SHAKARWATI FARMAD STARTS from Dumbass. Dont give us your fantasies.

Wikipedia literally ripped your hindu lungi in pieces thats why you are here trying to explaining the events and conjuring your own accounts. Every Muslim knows that Splitting of the Moon happenned before the Raid of Mecca. So the Smuggling of Idol to India is just a Hindu Fantasy and lying piece of GARBAGE.

Its pretty Clear your pulling stories out of your rear again about QISSAT and making absurd claims but Wikipedia pretty much lights your lungi on FIRE.:lol:

I am quoting the various Arab histories regarding the Manat. All of them from ARAB Historians and Arab Manuscripts.

Why are you Quoting stupid Stories about the Idol Mannat. Post Manuscripts of the IDOL being SMUGGLED TO INDIA you dumbass. We are not interested in your stupid hindu fantasies you lying piece of Garbage.

You are an EMBARASSMENT To Hindu Call Center Troll Bridage Chutiya!!!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom