Ohhh really??? OK lets look at the link that windjammer provided and its sources
Here is what he provided -
F-104A/B in Combat
Here is what i provided
[3.0] F-104 In Foreign Service (2)
Sources
Now may i ask what source you find to be Indian here??? In fact most of the sources in both the links are same...The only difference is my link is more recent than link by windjammer...Comon open your eyes before making foolish statements and calling others immature....
Wow...what a justification...when you do not accept anything written by Indian you want me to accept what Pakistan says??? Isn't this immature??? I have shared with you a neutral source claiming there were
significantlosses...provide me a neutral source which says the opposite...i know you can't...
Let me for your benefit tell you something more clearly...
Mig-21 was soviet answer to F-104....F-104 was designed for Hit and Run combat as it was not maneuverable like Mig-21...This is what Indian's exploited...Care to explain the fighter that did well in 65(as claimed by Pak) was suddenly replaced by Mirage 5 right after the war where as per Pak it did well??? Does that make sense??? A fighter suddenly was not worth right with in 6 years time frame....Think about it...
As said before as far as this source is concerned it is dedicated to F-104 and its sales across the world as well its performance with different Air Forces...Lockhead would know each and every F-104 being made and what was sold to whom...Along with what was transferred from what country to what.....
P.S : I think i have said enough on this topic....If you don't agree then debunk me with sources...
Look at post# 19, 21 where i am asking for sources from members posting their findings...then look at post#30 where growler gave me western source about 71 war...I took it and started my fact findings...Now tell me when i say lets stick to one topic in hand how wrong was I??? After 7 pages what have we concluded...Nothing.....
Its just fan boys who don't want to find the truth but want to push others and debunk them....
Now Look at post#41..On my request of source windJammer again gave me 71 war source...and then look at post#45 i requested you to stick to 71 since i already had two bulky posts to reply and wanted to keep the discussion in check so that we all can learn and conclude...Fair???
Now look at this thread....Pictures, Newspaper cuttings etc are being shared without any particular direction....So i try to give some direction in post # 45(Indian Source) and then post # 52(neutral source)....Not only that instead of just copy pasting exercise i posted only relevant columns and asked some very valid questions....How about ou replying to them???? I know you won't because the obvious will come out...If you don't think so why don't you answer them???
Just for your comfort i am re-posting my neutral link where this canadian gentelman clearly says who was ruling the sky....look at my post 52 and if you can answer my questions...
The India-Pakistan War Of 1971: A Modern War