Different shades of PTI عمران خان وزیراعظم بننے سے پہلے اور اسد عمر وزیر خزانہ بننے کے بعد۔

[Zibago]

Agreed. Haven't I said enough time to give this government the time it needs to set its policies in motion multiple times already?

Policies are clear a very hard pinch for us that will hurt for 2 years

 

[VCheng]

Policies are clear a very hard pinch for us that will hurt for 2 years

That may be true, but policies are best judged by the results they deliver, and not by the claims made. This government has the time to deliver still, and there should be no rush to judge them for now.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

We should tell our public that military takeover will cut cost of running political govt as military will not need extra pay to run govt and decisions can be made quickly which will benefit ordinary public life and will make economy strong

The military would just get desified and ruined. Is that what you want? You see there is continous tension between western ideas and desi way of doing things. Since British left the police, civil service has become desified. The military because it largely remains isolated from the sea of Pakistani dynamics has been largely insulated from being desified. Your suggestion would end up desifiing the military and ruining the last institution that is still intact.

It is known fact that in extended times when army was in power corruption, nepotism crept into the military heirachy leading to reduced professionalism. We saw that with Gen. Zia's era when the army was caught politiking ignoring it's primary job - defence of it's borders. Result India grabbed Siachen which we still have not got back.

 

[VCheng]

We should tell our public that military takeover will cut cost of running political govt as military will not need extra pay to run govt and decisions can be made quickly which will benefit ordinary public life and will make economy strong

Military rule imposed illegally has always left the country worse off than before, always remember that lesson from Pakistan's history.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Military rule imposed illegally has always left the country worse off than before, always remember that lesson from Pakistan's history.

As a general rule I agree. However if Ayub Khan had not taken over there would have been no Pakistan today.

 

[VCheng]

As a general rule I agree. However if Ayub Khan had not taken over there would have been no Pakistan today.

Every dictator has claimed that and failed miserably. Such apologism for the military's illegal actions must stop if Pakistan is to get anywhere.

 

[Yaseen1]

The military would just get desified and ruined. Is that what you want? You see there is continous tension between western ideas and desi way of doing things. Since British left the police, civil service has become desified. The military because it largely remains isolated from the sea of Pakistani dynamics has been largely insulated from being desified. Your suggestion would end up desifiing the military and ruining the last institution that is still intact.

It is known fact that in extended times when army was in power corruption, nepotism crept into the military heirachy leading to reduced professionalism. We saw that with Gen. Zia's era when the army was caught politiking ignoring it's primary job - defence of it's borders. Result India grabbed Siachen which we still have not got back.

1965 war was won under military rule,during gen zia he was allowing politicians to share power like he launched pmln

 

[LeGenD]

Iqtidar k lalach nay Imran Khan ko pagal kar diya hai

Shareef khandaan ko bhee.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

1965 war was won under military rule

It was draw at best and loss at worse. By no way stretch of imagination was it victory. And I had fair few relatives serving in the army in that war so don't take me as anti-military. But facts are facts.

Such apologism for the military's illegal actions must stop if Pakistan is to get anywhere.

I am not being a apologist but realist. I agree on the whole military rule is bad but there are few outliers that go against the accepted truism. Ayub is one example, Ataturk is another, Nasser of Egypt another, Gen. Park Chung-hee whose junta effectively laid the foundation of modern South Korean miracle are rare example from history.

 

[VCheng]

I am not being a apologist but realist. I agree on the whole military rule is bad but there are few outliers that go against the accepted truism. Ayub is one example, Ataturk is another, Nasser of Egypt another, Gen. Park Chung-hee whose junta effectively laid the foundation of modern South Korean miracle are rare example from history.

My comments apply only to Pakistan, I care not about the others you mention.

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

Politicians have no credibility aur girgut ki tra rung badaltey hain..feel sorry for those who believe in their fake promises ..

 

[Musafir117]

u turns = lie + Cheat
62-63?

 

[BATMAN]

@Men in Green you are a dead meat.

u turns = lie + Cheat
62-63?

Ruling against Musharraf was appreciated by All Parties Democratic Alliance made in UK.

 

[PakSword]

Shareef khandan theek kab tha

oye tum yahan bhi aagaey siasat pk pey gand phelanay ke baad!

 

[jupiter2007]

I can't say about Imran Khan Niazi but his team is bigger idiots, morons and corrupts.

Idiotic and moronic behavior is common for our politicians, they don’t think before they speak and when they realize that they have made a fool out of themselves then they back track their comments.
As far as corruption it concerned, if they are corrupt, opposition should File a case against them.