How about self accountability first before coming to "people". Now in essence if your take is " this is okay" and people who disagree with this themselves watch XYZ, hence they are hypocrites etc etc. Well then my friend your opening yourself to a whole new array of questions which btw don't put you in the easiest of positions. Let's start with basic facts, how many people do you know personally who watch XYZ and take issue with such ads ? Secondly, lets assume that the majority population is composed of hypocrites that watch XYZ, but criticize such ads. The rather simple explanation of why that is, is because this is a collectivist culture. Now I know many like you will not like this explanation, but it does encapsulate the state of things that we have today.
But there is one type of hypocrisy that is also rampant on the other side, a type of hypocrisy that we don't usually see the left talking about. It goes something like this -- Individual A thinks that dancing in the street is okay. If tomorrow individual A's mother starts dancing in the streets -- well now it's not so okay no more. There have been liberals in the west that defend prostitution as a source of income -- yet if you say to them -- "we agree with your position on this, so how about we pay X amount of dollars so that we become your daughters first customers ?" -- suddenly all liberalism is shoved outside the window and you cant differentiate between a lib and a conservative no more ...
Vulgarity is very subjective. You ask me and I'd agree with you that it wasn't vulgar. But it has some sketchy -- scratch that, VERY SKETCHY symbolism involved in it. Your a twenty something year old lad, so I expect that being a 90's kid, you know what a woman's chadar (the dupata/cloth wore on the head) stood for. I don't know about you but I've seen a mob beating the living $hit out of a guy for just pulling on a girl's chaddar. This event was back in 2013/14 so not so long ago. That too in a locality considered very posh and educated.
So the symbolism of dropping your own chaddar is one that is quite sketchy ..As far as hypocrisy goes, as I've explained -- it goes both ways .. Lastly, don't call it "clever marketing" my friend, it's the farthest thing from it.
What I do find sort of funny is that these "big balled ladies" who by the way are dressed and look like they belong from the elite of the society, they went and performed cringe worthy dance moves in a locality who by most scales would be considered oppressed, certainly more oppressed then those ladies. Yet, we're here talking about how these women are oppressed when they were in real life the most privileged individuals in the entire video.
Secondly, why is it that your version of "morality" or the scale which you use to judge right from wrong is any superior to
@Zarvan . I've got many disagreements with him but that doesn't mean that I go and start calling names just because the logical argument I present fails to do the job. e.g. I've seen the use of the word bigot alot, while the likes of you complain about slut shaming.
-No one claims what they did was illegal.
- If you believe in democracy, then the collective wishes of the nation should be applied .. or is it that we only believe in democracy for all what seems right to a certain section of society, and completely ignore their wishes .. when there is no point of agreement ?
-Thanks for posting the message -- this is more or less them admitting their failure ..
butts will be butted
In the WEST they keep cultural sensitivities in mind while when same is applied by desi people in Pakistan or India well they are doomed and one extreme starts making it an issue of gender.
