What's new

Diaoyu Islands News and Updates

Good going..we'll soon find out what is the capability of those "futuristic" chinese weapons...and a war on pacific will ring doom for china(as nobody is supporting their stand,their stand is clearly against UNCLOS).China is just helping to create an "ASIAN NATO" against it by itself.
 
well, That's dangerous and hard move made by PRC, don't play too much...
 
1月30日是522舰,向夕立号照射。
Jan 30, China 522 locked Jap 112

214134u3bh22ellojldpil.jpg.thumb.jpg




1月19日是526舰,向大波号的舰载直升机照射。

Jan 19, China 526 locked Jap helicopter
214135g4gumzsi56uiu6zg.jpg.thumb.jpg



522 and 526 are old ship in Chinese fleet , see what will happen next , game 2.0 came.
 
U mean Diaoyu Island had been taken before WWI?

This island was taken by Japan during the invasion of Taiwan after Sino-Japanese war in 1895. Prior to that, this island was not Japanese territory.
 
Japan's Abe condemns China radar-lock as ‘provocative’

Wednesday, 06 February, 2013, 10:55am
Agence France-Presse in Tokyo


abecross.jpg

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (right) answers questions in parliament on Wednesday. Photos: AFP


The radar-lock that a Chinese frigate put on a Japanese warship was “dangerous” and “provocative”, Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said on Wednesday, as tensions in a territorial row ratcheted up.

“It was a dangerous act that could have led to an unpredictable situation,” Abe told parliament. “It is extremely regrettable. We strongly ask for their self-restraint in order to avoid an unnecessary escalation.”


The hawkish prime minister, who took office late December following a landslide win in elections, described the radar-locking as “unilateral provocative action by the Chinese side”.

Abe’s comments come a day after Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera announced weapon-targeting radar had been directed at the Japanese vessel in international waters of the East China Sea last week.

The move marks the first time the two nations’ navies have locked horns in a dispute that has some commentators warning about a possible armed conflict.

US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Washington was “concerned” over the incident.

“With regard to the reports of this particular lock-on incident, actions such as this escalate tensions and increase the risk of an incident or a miscalculation, and they could undermine peace, stability and economic growth in this vital region,” she said.

Onodera said a Japanese military helicopter was also locked with a similar radar on January 19.

Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Katsunobu Kato told a news conference that Tokyo lodged a protest against Beijing over the radar-locking on Tuesday and asked for an explanation, but was yet to receive any reply.

Radar is used to precisely determine a target’s distance, direction, speed and altitude. Weapon systems linked to the radar can be fired immediately, Japan’s government said.

The move is a ratcheting-up of an already tense situation in the East China Sea, where Asia’s two largest economies are at loggerheads over the sovereignty of an uninhabited island chain.

On Tuesday Tokyo summoned China’s envoy in protest at the presence a day earlier of Chinese government – but not military – ships in the waters around the Tokyo-controlled Senkakus, which Beijing claims as the Diaoyus.

Beijing has repeatedly sent ships to the area since Japan nationalised some islands in the chain in September. The move triggered a diplomatic dispute and huge anti-Japan demonstrations across China.

Beijing has also sent air patrols to the archipelago and recently both Beijing and Tokyo have scrambled fighter jets, though there have been no clashes.
 
The funny reality is

US/JAPAN has already did that sort of things 100+ times before to PLA

8577_836375.gif
 
They are of course !???
JMSDF call that, bro!
Nope, the Japanese called a Chinese frigate targeting their naval vessel. A destroyer is larger and mightier than a frigate, as far as I know.

The funny reality is
US/JAPAN has already did that sort of things 100+ times before to PLA
in military exercises US/JAPAN, not compareable to what you did.
 
Abe’s comments come a day after Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera announced weapon-targeting radar had been directed at the Japanese vessel in international waters of the East China Sea last week.
"On 30 January, something like fire-control radar was directed at a Japan Self-Defence Maritime escort ship in the East China Sea," Mr Onodera told reporters on Tuesday.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-far-east/223260-diaoyu-islands-news-updates-26.html#ixzz2K6WV70Hg
BEIJING: Japan has complained to China that it targeted a Japanese maritime escort ship using a fire-controlled radar on January 30.

The radar targeting by a Chinese frigate follows months of acrimonious shadow boxing by politicians of the two countries quarreling over ownership of the Diaoyu islands.

Japanese defence minister Itsunori Onodera said his government has lodged a formal protest with China on the matter. Observers said such protests are no more than diplomatic formalities meant to score points and do not serve any real purpose.

What is significant is that China has taken a military action expressing its impatience over Japan's control over the islands. "Directing such radar is very abnormal. We recognize it would create a very dangerous situation with a single misstep," Onodera said. He said Japan's Yuudachi vessel and the Chinese frigate were about 3km apart at the time.

Japanese media quoted Onodera as saying that it took the ministry until Tuesday to determine that a fire-control radar had targeted the Japanese ship. A Japanese military helicopter was also targeted with a similar radar by another Chinese frigate on 19 January, he said.
The "maritime escort ship" that the Japanese defense minister referred to is the Yuudachi, which is a Japanese navy destroyer. The two warships is 3km apart in international water.
 
Nope, the Japanese called a Chinese frigate targeting their naval vessel. A destroyer is larger and mightier than a frigate, as far as I know.


in military exercises US/JAPAN, not compareable to what you did.


exercises? sorry, but not in exercises, they are already get used to it and don't allow others doing the same ^_^||
 
exercises? sorry, but not in exercises, they are already get used to it and don't allow others doing the same ^_^||
Any source for what you say, little princess?

The "maritime escort ship" that the Japanese defense minister referred to is the Yuudachi, which is a Japanese navy destroyer. The two warships is 3km apart in international water.
Yuh, the Japanese were not amused.

2013-02-05T220813Z_3_CBRE9141FOO00_RTROPTP_2_CNEWS-US-CHINA-JAPAN.JPG

destroyer Yuudachi
 
Any source for what you say, little princess?


Yuh, the Japanese were not amused.

2013-02-05T220813Z_3_CBRE9141FOO00_RTROPTP_2_CNEWS-US-CHINA-JAPAN.JPG

destroyer Yuudachi

NOT in official news but heard that from a soldier in PLA Navy.
but I think it is true, base on following reasons:

1- Japan / US Navy all have more advanced equipment (inc. radars) and warships

2- they all review PLA Navy as some kind of "threat" since long ago

3- In this case, Japan warship was 3000m away from PLA ship in international water, their reason to be so close was definitely not for "friendship"... they know that because they also using radar... and tracing, for provocation

4- http://signsofthefuture.wordpress.c...warning-shots-at-chinese-surveillance-planes/ - see what Japan did before

nanking_massacre_11911575.jpg
 
Any source for what you say, little princess?


Yuh, the Japanese were not amused.

2013-02-05T220813Z_3_CBRE9141FOO00_RTROPTP_2_CNEWS-US-CHINA-JAPAN.JPG

destroyer Yuudachi
The Japanese ship is a warship, a destroyer that is much bigger than the Chinese frigate. And they are unusually near to each other as far as warship goes in open international water.

I just wonder why the news report do not go right out and state that fact, instead they use word like "maritime escort ship" or "Japanese vessel". An unsuspecting reader might get the impression that the Japanese ship is a similar or smaller size civilian vessel.

Is it because for propaganda purposes, the Japanese is to be painted like a "victim"? Because it would be harder to make people believe that the smaller Chinese warship is "threatening" the much bigger Japanese warship?

The mentioning of firing missile is also strange, because you cannot fire ship to ship missile at that close range. But of course the ordinary reader without military knowledge would not know that. They would just believe what they are being fed by the media.

We were also not told about the two ships speed and vector and what they are doing. Well, I think it take two to tango.
 
Back
Top Bottom