What's new

Dhaka - Delhi defence pact a threat to South Asian stability

Bangladesh cut its arms and gave it to India. When has in a is gone Bangladesh will be in grave trouble.
Bangladesh is acting like sub state of india. If there is trouble in 7 state sisters Indian defence pact will not be helpful if this is a move to control bangladesh then it's a fail policy
 
. .
Defence deal with India will not be justifiable

A vehement chorus of disapproval and remonstration has been raging among Dhaka’s civil society actors, newspaper columnists, eminent citizens and diplomats, except a few pro-Indian persons conspicuously devoid of patriotism and unconcerned about national interest, as Delhi is intent on inking a defence deal with Bangladesh against the backdrop of Sino-Indian rivalry. For the record, Sino-Indian relations are likely to become strained as the Dalai Lama is scheduled to visit Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh this week which, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, will “only damage peace and stability of the border areas and bilateral relations.” China views the Dalai Lama’s visit to Tawang, an area of cultural and political significance to Tibetans, as potentially destabilizing. [Vide “Arunachal, Cultural and Strategic Flashpoint For Sino-Indian Relations”; refworld.org/docid/587cc \4224.html;13 January 2017].
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has threatened China with war on North Korea; and that war will not only be catastrophic for the people of the Korean peninsula but could drag in other major powers, including China, its ally Pakistan, Russia, Japan and other military powers, including those armed with nukes. It is here that the danger of world war arises. In the event of an absolutely pointless defence deal with India, Bangladesh—-because of its folly—-will be inescapably sucked into a lethal whirlpool of nuclear Armageddon.

Meanwhile, purchasing two Chinese submarines angered Delhi, subsequently the Indian defence secretary visited Dhaka, while Indian Army Chief Bipin Rawat had a three-day visit here. Dhaka never had or has any stupid wish—-even in its wildest dream—-to be unfriendly with the closest neighbour India or Myanmar, so why should a question of a deal arise? Can Bangladesh afford to attack India? Besides, India herself imports an enormous number of military hardware—-then is there any logic in buying from an importer?

Furthermore, a defence deal will be a useless proposition, a foolhardy act against the will of the masses. The people here are grateful to India for its cooperation during 1971 Liberation War in which 3 million people made supreme sacrifice. By the same token, India too should be grateful to Bangladesh which is her friend; for this reason India is relieved of the colossal burden of maintaining several divisions of troops and armaments in the Eastern frontier as she used to before 1972.

Bangladeshis are bitter about India for a variety of cogent reasons. These are: frequent killing of Bangladeshi civilians on the borders. In December 2010, Human Rights Watch released a report, “Trigger Happy: Excessive Use of Force by at the Bangladesh Border”, on December 9, 2010, documenting indiscriminate extrajudicial killings, arbitrary detention, torture, and ill-treatment by the Indian BSF troops.
[hrw.org/report/2010/12/09/trigger-happy/excessive-use-force-indian-troops-bangladesh-border
]

How friendly is India? On the 4,096-kilometre long Bangladesh-India international border. 3406 kilometres will be fenced with barbed wire and concrete at a cost of US$430 million, of which 2735 kilometres of the fencing was completed by November 2007. Is it a friendly gesture?

For more than a decade, India has secretly provided arms and money to tribal insurgents —- Chakma and other tribes in the Chittagong Hills—-fighting for an autonomous state in Bangladesh, rebels given sanctuary in this border areas. A senior security official at Agartala, India, confirmed such assistance and said an undetermined number of rebel fighters had stayed along the border near camps of Indian paramilitary forces. “The Government is giving them help,” the official added, without elaborating. [Vide Bangladeshi Insurgents Say India Is Supporting Them by Sanjoy Hazarika; nytimes. com/1989/ 06/11/ world/ Bangladeshi -insurgents-say -india-is-supporting -them datedJune 11, 1989]

Friendly India’s withdrawal of the Ganges water at Farakka Barrage, which dries up the Padma river from November to June, is an endless agony. India has wanton disregard for co-riparian Dhaka’s water needs as the parched Teesta remains a vast sand dune, like the Padma, from November to June; whopping trade imbalance and so on.

Dhaka is Delhi’s great benefactor. According to the World Bank, Bangladesh ranks fifth (behind the UAE, the USA, Saudi Arabia and the UK) among the top 15 countries from which India draws remittance from her expatriates. Indian expats in Bangladesh remit over $3.7 billion yearly. [Vide Dr. Habib Siddiqui weekly holiday.net/ homepage/ pages/UserHome. aspx?ID =5&date=03/07/2014]

We wish to presume, PM Sheikh Hasina, elder daughter of the nation’s architect Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, will not sign any deal or MoU that will be detrimental to Bangladesh’s sovereignty and security, keeping in mind that her motherland is significantly great in terms of population, economy and one of the top defence forces of the world which can take care of themselves. [Vide “Dhaka-Delhi defence pact? No, thanks” by Shahid Islam, Holiday, March 17, 2017]. In sum, Bangladesh is proud of her Army which has a glorious heritage. All told, a highly contentious and sensitive issue like an unnecessary defence deal inviting peril for Dhaka must not be signed as it is fraught with multiple grave dangers.

http://www.weeklyholiday.net/Homepage/Pages/UserHome.aspx?ID=4&date=0#Tid=13773

@The Eagle please merge this one with https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/draft-mouon-indo-bangla-defence-cooperation.483141/ as the previous thread was merged. Thanks.

This specific thread explains impacts on south asia prospective. Please leave this thread as is.
 
.
This specific thread explains impacts on south asia prospective. Please leave this thread as is.

We can discuss all the impacts under a single thread. Too many threads on one particular topic will cover up threads on other topics.
 
.
We can discuss all the impacts under a single thread. Too many threads on one particular topic will cover up threads on other topics.

no one asked you to participate in this thread. You are free to take a hike
 
. . .
Bangladesh independence is officially submitted to india and thereby awami league chief Hasian officially inaugurated as chief minister of indian state of "Bangladesh".

It was meant to be brother. We have become beimaan and munfiq.

As part of Pakistan we had issue but we were not as vulnerable as today.

Don't expect another Dalim or Rasheed khan would show up to rescue ahsaan foramosh People of Bd.
 
.
It was meant to be brother. We have become beimaan and munfiq.

As part of Pakistan we had issue but we were not as vulnerable as today.

Don't expect another Dalim or Rasheed khan would show up to rescue ahsaan foramosh People of Bd.
you have said it all, bro.
 
.
I hope one of the pacts involves Bangladeshi improving its border force, so it can prevent Bangladeshis illegally entering India. We have enough of them already!
 
.
How friendly is India? On the 4,096-kilometre long Bangladesh-India international border. 3406 kilometres will be fenced with barbed wire and concrete at a cost of US$430 million, of which 2735 kilometres of the fencing was completed by November 2007. Is it a friendly gesture?

I have repeatedly asked this question and failed to get a sane response. How is it an unfriendly gesture to deal your border? What are national borders then meant for?

The issue of treatment meted out to Bangladeshis living in India is not the same as that of border fencing. Trying to muddle the two is quite fraudulent, frankly. And what I find most ironic is that I have never found any if the balanced BD members on PDF argue like this. It seems only the ones who hate India are also the ones who want a porous border. Why is that so?

Undoubtedly, the Bangladeshis currently living in India should be treated fairly and without discrimination. That is only fair. But is it not a government's duty to enforce laws, one of which is that illegal aliens should not enter its borders?

Personally, I am an internationalist. I am all for gradually dissolving national identities and a single world. But that is a process of consensus and gradual rule-making. In the meanwhile, governments have to enforce their laws. Treating existing laws as superfluous is a recipe for disaster.
 
.
For most hindus in Bangladesh, they consider india to be their motherland. But Muslims who are not part of awami league proxy, can not and will not accept indian occupation. That is the reality. So live with it.
And should stop insulting a person from another religion that too a Bangladeshi.
Allah clearly did not ask us to insult someone from another religion,where did you pick this you from?
 
.
what are the details of this "defence pact"?
 
.
Certain this thinking is driving this world to disaster.
1. They choose dispute instead of development.
2. They choose quarrel over peace.
3. They imagine violence and fight as solution to all issues.
Such people are strongly discriminatory about religion or race when countered.

Having a defence with India and Bangladesh would mean that now Bangladesh now doesn't have to worry about Myanmar.
 
.
It was meant to be brother. We have become beimaan and munfiq.

As part of Pakistan we had issue but we were not as vulnerable as today.

Don't expect another Dalim or Rasheed khan would show up to rescue ahsaan foramosh People of Bd.

They are too old to do any dirty work anymore.. :)

Certain this thinking is driving this world to disaster.
1. They choose dispute instead of development.
2. They choose quarrel over peace.
3. They imagine violence and fight as solution to all issues.
Such people are strongly discriminatory about religion or race when countered.

Having a defence with India and Bangladesh would mean that now Bangladesh now doesn't have to worry about Myanmar.
Bangladesh was never worried about Myanmar.
Its India which is worried about BD, MM, Nepal, Bhutan let alone the nightmare China...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom