What's new

Development of j-10C was first reported years back?J-10C a reality or fiction?

Mani2020

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
4,306
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
China's J10C Ground Attack Aircraft

by James Dunnigan
October 15, 2006

China is developing a fighter-bomber version of its F-16 clone, the J10. This new aircraft, a two seater, is the J10C. It was originally believed to be a naval version, but instead, it's an aircraft optimized for ground attack.

The first squadron of J10s entered service in early 2005. The J10 was designed and built in China, in an attempt to create a modern fighter-bomber that could compete with foreign designs. The experiment was not completely successful. Work on the J10 began twenty years ago, in an attempt to develop an aircraft that could compete with the Russian MiG-29s and Su-27s, and the American F-16.
But the first prototype did not fly until 1998. There were problems, and it wasn't until 2000 that the basic design flaws were fixed. By 2002, nine prototypes had been built, and flight testing was going forward to find, and fix, hundreds of smaller problems. It was a great learning experience for Chinese engineers, but it was becoming apparent that the J10 was not going to be competitive with the Su-27s/30s China was buying from Russia.
....
......(continues,deleted deliberately because of irrelevance)
.
.untill
. The J10C will have a weapons officer to concentrate on hitting things on the ground.

source:China's J10C Ground Attack Aircraft
 
Another article in 2009

Carrier-based J-10C fighter

b7fb95194f.jpg


The J-10C carrier-based fighter performance parameters estimated to be: the captain 14.57 meters, wingspan of 8.78 meters, height: 5.3 meters, sweep angle 50-52 degrees, the wing area of 38 square meters, vertical tail area of 8.4 square meters, thrust of 152 kN

Takeoff and landing roll distance: less than 50 meters
High altitude of the maximum speed: 2.0 Mach
Low maximum speed: 1.2 Mach (1473 km / h)
Maximum ceiling: 18,000 meters
Combat radius: 1,300 km
Maximum range: 3,000 km
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 18.27 thousand kilograms, 6000 kilograms load of bombs, thrust-weight ratio greater than 1.1.
Plug-in 11 (5 under the fuselage, each wing the next three), the largest external fuel tanks 4100 liters (1500 × 2,1100 × 1)

These data indicate that J-10C carrier-based and J-10 package type is almost identical, but thrust from 122 kN to 152 kN, roll distances have been shortened to 50 meters only. Like with the J-10, J-10C carrier-based addition to maintaining the normal level flight, there are enough thrust to meet the needs of the implementation of a variety of motor actions, so that the level of acceleration, climbing, circling, etc. have a larger performance increase, even in the air combat mode effortlessly vertically upwards.

J-10C will be equipped with a weapons system operator is responsible for precision strikes, J-10C can carry more than 4 tons of ammunition, but also equipped with a goal of launching precision-guided munitions pod instructions. This aircraft will probably have ground attack capability.

Source:China Arsenal: Carrier-based J-10C fighter
 
no possible,it's not worth to redesign the airframe structure of J10,601 already had J15.they are also working on a new medium fighter but it's still on drawing stage
what 611 needs to do is focus on J10B and JXX
 
Last edited:
These are experimental.....I dont think any thing coming like J-10C.
J-10B might be n shld be the focus.
 
It was a great learning experience for Chinese engineers, but it was becoming apparent that the J10 was not going to be competitive with the Su-27s/30s China was buying from Russia.

LOL.

It's funny to look back in hindsight and read derogatory and contemptuous comments like these by so-called professional journalists just to see how wrong they were.

What is apparent is that China is no longer buying any fighter planes from Russia but pressing ahead with development of the J-10. :yahoo:
 
China's J10C Ground Attack Aircraft

by James Dunnigan
October 15, 2006

China is developing a fighter-bomber version of its F-16 clone, the J10. This new aircraft, a two seater, is the J10C. It was originally believed to be a naval version, but instead, it's an aircraft optimized for ground attack.

The first squadron of J10s entered service in early 2005. The J10 was designed and built in China, in an attempt to create a modern fighter-bomber that could compete with foreign designs. The experiment was not completely successful. Work on the J10 began twenty years ago, in an attempt to develop an aircraft that could compete with the Russian MiG-29s and Su-27s, and the American F-16.
But the first prototype did not fly until 1998. There were problems, and it wasn't until 2000 that the basic design flaws were fixed. By 2002, nine prototypes had been built, and flight testing was going forward to find, and fix, hundreds of smaller problems. It was a great learning experience for Chinese engineers, but it was becoming apparent that the J10 was not going to be competitive with the Su-27s/30s China was buying from Russia.
....
......(continues,deleted deliberately because of irrelevance)
.
.untill
. The J10C will have a weapons officer to concentrate on hitting things on the ground.

source:China's J10C Ground Attack Aircraft

A 2-seater J-10? It's already operational, but it's called the J-10S. There are plenty of pics online.

Chengdu-J-10B-Xinhua-1ES.jpg

Chengdu-J-10B-Xinhua-2ES.jpg
 
the picture of j-10C doesnt seem real and has twin engines
 
Reports are that the J-10C uses two RD-33 engines, which won't require much of an airframe change.

J-10C will be for air defense (not fighter-bomber), and will serve alongside the J-15.

The reason we have both the J-10C and J-15 is that the J-15 isn't suited for air combat.

J-10C will also be a counter to the Eurofighter.
 
Here's a paragraph copied off an article at GrandeStrategy.com:

The Dragon's New Claws: The J-10B Emerging - Grande Strategy
Firstly, we have the First Generation J-10s with AL-31 engines. Chengdu was to follow these with a J-10A with WS-10A engines. This evolution has encountered obstacles related to reliability issues. The J-10B, represents a 4.5 generation plane but it remains to be seen what engine is used with this plane. Meanwhile, according to informed commentators, a J-10C with twin engines around the size of RD-33s and incorporating similar features to the J-10B has arrived. This is supposedly a direct competitor to the Eurofighter and has the same layout - twin engined canard delta with a single tail. The PLAAF will have to decide whether to go with the J-10B or the J-10C at some point. Pakistan will not go for the J-10C as the twin engines do not comply with their doctrine of single-engined fighters and with the AFDP-2019.


J-10%2BEvolution.jpg
 
J10Dx is also in development, already got 150 orders from PLAFF will enter service in 2014. look at the picture..awesome!

anakinstarfightereasy.jpg
 
J10Dx is also in development, already got 150 orders from PLAFF will enter service in 2014. look at the picture..awesome!

anakinstarfightereasy.jpg

Nope.. i think thats the Indian AMCA or F/A-XX 24th gen..
both will fly by the late 2130's..
Might also be the new 5th gen Talibunny Saif-ul-Aktooh..





now that is how you troll..
 
troll? it's just my answer for the topic..

"Development of j-10C was first reported years back?J-10C a reality or fiction? "
 
J10Dx is also in development, already got 150 orders from PLAFF will enter service in 2014. look at the picture..awesome!

anakinstarfightereasy.jpg

Correction.
That would be the Jedi Starfighter. It is about 8 meters long (or 5.7 meters long for Eta-2 variant). It makes up the bulk of the space defense squadron of the Republic.

It carries a variety of weaponry, including the dual laser cannons and a secondary ion cannon.

The difference between J-10C and the Starfighter is that the J-10C doesn't use ion cannons or laser cannons and it can only fly in the atmosphere. And that the J-10C's radar is nowhere near compared to the R2D2 robot used by the Starfighter.

It proved to be a good space-superiority fighter, but it was outperformed by the TIE interceptor. :):):)
 
Back
Top Bottom