What's new

Devastation of Pathankot

who knows?


Result : you were beaten blue, and expelled out of Lahore, our people rejoiced that India was blue.


remember to use Burnol

And what happened to your stated objective of invading kashmir the whole reason why you started 1965 war?

Tried capturing Kashmir ended up barely saving inner Lahore with outskirts occupied and controlled by Indian Army for duration of the war?
 
.
And what happened to your stated objective of invading kashmir the whole reason why you started 1965 war?
Tried capturing Kashmir ended up barely saving inner Lahore with outskirts occupied and controlled by Indian Army for duration of the war?
our objective was start insurgencies in Kashmir, which are still going on, and dude, dont flatter yourself we captured your territory too
 
.
our objective was start insurgencies in Kashmir, which are still going on, and dude, dont flatter yourself we captured your territory too
Yes you captured territory in Kashmir sector when you outnumbered our troops 6:1 and had tanks operating in that sector which made Indian tanks look like matchboxes.

Your objective was to seize Kashmir not create insurgencies. Know your own history atleast its the very basic you can do.

All those gains neutralised in Punjab sector. You lost your objectives.. We gained/lost nothing. Just a preparation for big bang 6 years later :D
 
.
our objective was start insurgencies in Kashmir, which are still going on, and dude, dont flatter yourself we captured your territory too

Ya you managed to start fire in your neighbors house....but now your house is in fire. No serious terrorist event in J&K for a long time now....and in Pakistan its a monthly affair. Didn't and haven't got an inch of Kashmir by starting the insurgency...but have put the lives of innocent Kashmiris as well as Pakistanis in danger. There is a cost of keeping a monster in your backyard....it needs blood, if it cannot cross the fence and reach the neighbor...then the owner is the next best thing.
 
.
Yes you captured territory in Kashmir sector when you outnumbered our troops 6:1 and had tanks operating in that sector which made Indian tanks look like matchboxes.
Your objective was to seize Kashmir not create insurgencies. Know your own history atleast its the very basic you can do.
All those gains neutralised in Punjab sector. You lost your objectives.. We gained/lost nothing. Just a preparation for big bang 6 years later
our tanks were obsolete, read a bit of Pakistani version too, and dude, if you read the book i was reading you would get to know the miscalculations, the miscommunications in the PA, and how weak our Army was at that time, still when they attacked Kashmir, your C in C got so scared he attacked Lahore, and you were beaten blue there too lOlllzzz

use burnol please

Ya you managed to start fire in your neighbors house....but now your house is in fire. No serious terrorist event in J&K for a long time now....and in Pakistan its a monthly affair. Didn't and haven't got an inch of Kashmir by starting the insurgency...but have put the lives of innocent Kashmiris as well as Pakistanis in danger. There is a cost of keeping a monster in your backyard....it needs blood, if it cannot cross the fence and reach the neighbor...then the owner is the next best thing.
you have terrorist activities in IOK too
 
. .
our tanks were obsolete, read a bit of Pakistani version too, and dude, if you read the book i was reading you would get to know the miscalculations, the miscommunications in the PA, and how weak our Army was at that time, still when they attacked Kashmir, your C in C got so scared he attacked Lahore, and you were beaten blue there too lOlllzzz

use burnol please


you have terrorist activities in IOK too

How weak your army was? Then it would seem Pakistan lost its marbles in 1965 that they attacked a bigger neighbour with a weak army. Better tanks much better air force however it dint matter as in war tactics matter the most.

Till 1962 we had a PM who wanted to abolish the institution of army and only wanted armed police.
Pakistan had a superior armour corps for the duration of the war although they took a massive hammering in Punjab sector.

Our establishment opened a new front to relieve our outnumbered and outgunned troops in Kashmir which resulted in massive redeployment of terrified pakistanis troops from invasion of kashmir to desperate defence of lahore.
 
. .
How weak your army was? Then it would seem Pakistan lost its marbles in 1965 that they attacked a bigger neighbour with a weak army. Better tanks much better air force however it dint matter as in war tactics matter the most.

Till 1962 we had a PM who wanted to abolish the institution of army and only wanted armed police.
Pakistan had a superior armour corps for the duration of the war although they took a massive hammering in Punjab sector.

Our establishment opened a new front to relieve our outnumbered and outgunned troops in Kashmir which resulted in massive redeployment of terrified pakistanis troops from invasion of kashmir to desperate defence of lahore.
yes, our Armour was better, but our Army wanted to start an insurgency in Kashmir like you are doing in Baluchistan, and like you did in East Pakistan, but look, we started the insurgency, defended Lahore and lost no land, YAY


burnol, use it
 
. .
yes, our Armour was better, but our Army wanted to start an insurgency in Kashmir like you are doing in Baluchistan, and like you did in East Pakistan, but look, we started the insurgency, defended Lahore and lost no land, YAY


burnol, use it


No need to misrepresent facts. Your army wanted to seize Kashmir and ended up barely saving Lahore. Whats yay about it?

Unless defeat and surrender is a part and parcel of your daily functioning?
 
.
No need to misrepresent facts. Your army wanted to seize Kashmir and ended up barely saving Lahore. Whats yay about it?

Unless defeat and surrender is a part and parcel of your daily functioning?
our Army wanted to start an insurgency. not seize it
 
. .
you have terrorist activities in IOK too

Did I denied that there is no terrorism in J&K?? There is but the scale of operation is now minimized ...When is the last time you heard of a bomb blast in J&K claiming 50+ lives and injuring hundreds?? As I mentioned previously, you are happy that you started fire in your neighbors house....but that fire has now put your house in fire. On the other hand the neighbor has managed to put down the fire and minimize the damage.
 
.
Did I denied that there is no terrorism in J&K?? There is but the scale of operation is now minimized ...When is the last time you heard of a bomb blast in J&K claiming 50+ lives and injuring hundreds?? As I mentioned previously, you are happy that you started fire in your neighbors house....but that fire has now put your house in fire. On the other hand the neighbor has managed to put down the fire and minimize the damage.
if it so peceful why 5 lac + IA personnel there?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom