What's new

Destruction under the Mongol empire

Charon 2

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
Country
Turkey
Location
Germany
Destruction under the Mongol Empire quantifies death toll and infrastructure damage ensuing from the 13th century Mongol conquests. Historian Wei-chieh Tsai has written, "The Mongol conquests shook Eurasia and were of significant influence in world history."[1]

Historians regard the Mongol raids and invasions as some of the deadliestconflicts in human history up through that period. Brian Landers has offered that, "One empire in particular exceeded any that had gone before, and crossed from Asia into Europe in an orgy of violence and destruction. The Mongols brought terror to Europe on a scale not seen again until the twentieth century."[2] Diana Lary contends that the Mongol invasions induced population displacement "on a scale never seen before," particularly in Central Asia and Eastern Europe. She adds, "the impending arrival of the Mongol hordes spread terror and panic."[3]


The majority of kingdoms resisting Mongol conquest were taken by force (some were subjected to vassaldom and not complete conquest); only skilled engineers and artisans (at the time of Khubilai Khan, doctors) were spared. Documents written during or just after Genghis Khan's reign state that following a conquest Mongol soldiers looted, pillaged and raped, while the Khan had first pick of women captives.

These techniques were used to spread terror and warning to others. Some troops who submitted, respectively overthrew or rose up against their rulers, were incorporated into the Mongol system in order to expand their manpower; this also allowed the Mongols to absorb new technology, knowledge and skills for use in military campaigns against other opponents.

Genghis Khan was by and large tolerant of multiple religions and there are no cases of him or other Mongols engaging inreligious war, as long as populations were obedient. He also passed a decree exempting all followers of the Taoist religion from paying taxes. (This might appear to date from the time of Khubilai Khan.) However, all of the campaigns caused deliberate destruction of places of worship, if their populations resisted.[7]


Drawing of Mongols inside Suzdalunder Batu Khan (with sword).
Ancient sources described Genghis Khan's conquests as wholesale destruction on an unprecedented scale in certain geographical regions, causing great demographic changes in Asia. According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din (1247–1318), theMongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv and more than a million in Nishapur. The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 as a result of mass extermination and famine. Population exchanges did also in some cases occur but depends as of when.[8]

China reportedly suffered a drastic decline in population during the 13th and 14th centuries. Before the Mongol invasion, Chinese dynasties reportedly had approximately 120 million inhabitants; after the conquest was completed in 1279, the 1300 census reported roughly 60 million people. The most likely is that in fact up to and around 30 million outstanding was posted outside in the army levies. The 92 Chinese cities destroyed by Mongols would not appear to account for this population fall, it might account for loss of 45 million people. While it is tempting to attribute this major decline solely to Mongol ferocity, scholars today have mixed sentiments regarding this subject. The South Chinese might likely account for some 40 million unregistered who, without passports, would not have appeared in the census. Entire peasant populations joining or enlisted for labour can result in a large population reduction due to food shortage problems. Scholars such as Frederick W. Mote argue that the wide drop in numbers reflects an administrative failure to record rather than a de facto decrease whilst others such as Timothy Brook argue that the Mongols created a system of enserfment among a huge portion of the Chinese populace causing many to disappear from the census altogether. Other historians like William McNeill and David Morgan argue that the Bubonic Plague was the main factor behind the demographic decline during this period.


Mongol campaigns in Northern China, Central Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East caused extensive destruction, though there are no exact figures available at this time. The cities of Herat, Kiev, Baghdad, Nishapur, Vladimir andSamarkand suffered serious devastation by the Mongol armies.[12][13] For example, there is a noticeable lack of Chinese literature from the Jin Dynasty, predating the Mongol conquest, and in the Battle of Baghdad (1258) libraries, books, literature, and hospitals were burned: some of the books were thrown into the river, in quantities sufficient to "turn theEuphrates black with ink for several days".

The Mongols' natural, popular and martial purpose destruction of the irrigation systems of Iran and Iraq turned back centuries of effort to improving agriculture and water supply in these regions. The loss of available food as a result may have led to the death of more people from starvation in this area than actual battle did. The Islamic civilization of the Persian Gulf region was not to recover until after the Middle Ages.[14]
 
.
the original mongols didn't spare anyone in middle east. thanks to the sultanate of delhi their attempts to invade subcontinent were repelled, but barlas mongols (taimur and somewhat babur) later succeeded in the form of persianized mughals. but the animist pagan mongols were in a different league totally from chughtai turks. the way they steamrolled everything from china to eastern europe, and decimated the innocent populations in those numbers with such prejudice just sends shivers. the cruelty of hulagu khan is a thing of legend. still makes me uneasy when recalling the stuff i've read.
 
.
Wait a minute. If the population of Persia dropped from 2,5 Million to 250.000 people does this mean that Mongols killed basically 80% of the population of Iran?
 
.
Sins of the fathers.
Most Mongolians today reside in Inner Mongolia province, they are a defeated people. Their people contributed nothing to human civilization, only suffering and despair.

The Sung dynasty was corrupt as hell towards the end but still held off the Mongolian scourge the longest. When they fell, nothing could stop them in the west.
 
.
the original mongols didn't spare anyone in middle east. thanks to the sultanate of delhi their attempts to invade subcontinent were repelled, but barlas mongols (taimur and somewhat babur) later succeeded in the form of persianized mughals. but the animist pagan mongols were in a different league totally from chughtai turks. the way they steamrolled everything from china to eastern europe, and decimated the innocent populations in those numbers with such prejudice just sends shivers. the cruelty of hulagu khan is a thing of legend. still makes me uneasy when recalling the stuff i've read.

they spared the inhabitants of Hilla and those cities who surrendered. The country-side was largely spared. Hulagu Khan spared Mosul. There are numerous examples.

Wait a minute. If the population of Persia dropped from 2,5 Million to 250.000 people does this mean that Mongols killed basically 80% of the population of Iran?

i dont believe in these figures.

Mongols spared south Iran. Areas like Fars province, Khuzestan, Luristan. At least a third of Persians were living right here.

Mongols also spared Tabrez [ a big and major population centre ]

So, killing 80% of the population is an exaggeration.
 
.
they spared the inhabitants of Hilla and those cities who surrendered. The country-side was largely spared. Hulagu Khan spared Mosul. There are numerous examples.



i dont believe in these figures.

Mongols spared south Iran. Areas like Fars province, Khuzestan, Luristan. At least a third of Persians were living right here.

Mongols also spared Tabrez [ a big and major population centre ]

So, killing 80% of the population is an exaggeration.[/quote


Tabriz was also conquered by the Mongols just like whole Iran. I don't think it's an exaggeration that 80% of the population of the Khwarazmian empire died due to Mongol conquests considering the fact that alone 1 Million people died in Nishapur. Merv in modern Turkmenistan also lost almost 1 million inhabitans.
 
. .
Wait a minute. If the population of Persia dropped from 2,5 Million to 250.000 people does this mean that Mongols killed basically 80% of the population of Iran?

In Kypchak, Bulghar and Russian campaign, they were ordered to cut the right ears of their victims. Total ears accumulated were 250.000 according to one source, 700.000 according to other source. (See Abu'l Farac, and Juwaini for details)

Millions of death are highly exaggerated. Consider famine, bandit raids, emigration as reasons of population decrease.
 
.
What I don't understand is where did the Mongols get the manpower to carry out such massive campaign without over stretching their forces defeating one army after the other.
 
. .
What I don't understand is where did the Mongols get the manpower to carry out such massive campaign without over stretching their forces defeating one army after the other.

It's so mind boggling what they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You see ISIS doing inhumane things, but compared to the Mongols it's a joke. Imagine living in China, Iran, etc. when they were coming though.....

Sad thing is, if the king doesnt initially surrender, they basically massacre the whole city. Regular people always getting screwed.
 
.
It's so mind boggling what they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You see ISIS doing inhumane things, but compared to the Mongols it's a joke. Imagine living in China, Iran, etc. when they were coming though.....

Sad thing is, if the king doesnt initially surrender, they basically massacre the whole city. Regular people always getting screwed.

Surrender or get massacred seems to be pretty much the same tactics as Alexander of Macedonia. But again I don't understand how did they not get over stretched by geography and number of confrontations is beyond my understanding.
 
.
Surrender or get massacred seems to be pretty much the same tactics as Alexander of Macedonia. But again I don't understand how did they not get over stretched by geography and number of confrontations is beyond my understanding.

the technicalities @AUSTERLITZ can perhaps explain better. but from my understanding mongols had a very secular and efficient administrative structure so conquered territories were allowed their cultural freedoms to an extent with relatively less revolts which would otherwise slow down their campaign or hold them up much. as for battle tactics i remember reading that in an era when retreating was considered as defeat, mongols did not subscribe to same notions of honour but were very strategic. so their well fortified encampments were used very tactfully. chingiz khan and some of his progeny were real masters at tactical military warfare, very advanced for those days.
 
.
Wait a minute. If the population of Persia dropped from 2,5 Million to 250.000 people does this mean that Mongols killed basically 80% of the population of Iran?

This is obviously a gross exaggeration. . Correct estimate of loss of population of Iran is about 30%. It took about 100 years for Iran to recover from Mughal onslaught and by the time of Tamerlane, about 150 year later, Iran was again a thriving country.

However, some cities such as Balkh and Nishapur no doubt suffered annihilation and never fully recovered. Historic Balkh of today is just a town, not even a facsimile of the great ancient cultural centre.
 
.
What I don't understand is where did the Mongols get the manpower to carry out such massive campaign without over stretching their forces defeating one army after the other.

They used the conquered peoples in their military, after they conquered western steppes Turkic soldiers in their armies were more numerous then actual Mongols, they also used non-steppe people mainly as auxillary or vassal forces.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom