Democracy never flourished in Pakistan because rulers were hand-picked in past: PM

[M. Sarmad]

Of course. Just as the Supreme Court suddenly delivered swift justice to remove the previous PM, by the force of law. Of course.

Sudden and Swift? not really
The petition was filed against NS in August 2016, he was disqualified on July 28, 2017

 

[VCheng]

Sudden and Swift? not really
The petition was filed against NS in August 2016, he was disqualified on July 28, 2017

Oh yeah, just compare that to Asghar Khan's case and so on. The SC delivered results just in time in accordance with its assigned task. How opportune. Of course.

 

[Nilgiri]

Enjoyed reading the thread, thanks @VCheng , @M. Sarmad and @Retired Troll lol

 

[M. Sarmad]

Oh yeah, just compare that to Asghar Khan's case and so on. The SC delivered results just in time in accordance with its assigned task. How opportune. Of course.

Your hatred and contempt for Pakistan and its institutions runs deep, mate

Do you even know anything about Asghar Khan case ??

Here is a more relevant example:
A petition was filed against PM Yusuf Raza Gillani of PPP in March 2012, he was ousted and further disqualified in June 2012.

 

[VCheng]

Enjoyed reading the thread, thanks @VCheng , @M. Sarmad and @Retired Troll lol

And I have received several warning of a dubious nature already.

Back on topic, I foresee the staunch supporters lash out even more viciously at the realists like me once the gap between what was promised and what will be delivered grows wider and wider, if I may be allowed to make a prediction. To paraphrase Yogi Berra, predictions are hard, specially the ones about the future.

Your hatred and contempt for Pakistan and its institutions runs deep, mate

Do you even know anything about Asghar Khan case ??

Here is a more relevant example:
A petition was filed against PM Yusuf Raza Gillani of PPP in March 2012, he was ousted and further disqualified in June 2012.

Your accusations about my state of mind are totally wrong, and for a person like you, who should know better, is only an indication that you are running out of logical argument. The fact remains that the SC played its assigned role in ousting the elected government once again.

 

[Clutch]

Not really. Hate is over-rated in its ability to do anything useful.

That is a problem the Indian Hindutva have... Not us generous pure hearted ones...

 

[M. Sarmad]

.... The fact remains that the SC played its assigned role in ousting the elected government once again.

The only FACT is that you have absolutely nothing to back up your scornful claims and contemptuous allegations. You are acting as an insistent crusader against Pakistan and it's prime institutions.

 

[Clutch]

Oh the height of irony!

"Democracy never flourished in Pakistan because rulers were hand-picked in past: PM"

Hand-picked by whom? Why then blame those so hand-picked rather than the ones doing said hand-picking? And has that hand-picking changed at all even now?

Just as you have a strong security state of Israel because it is surrounded by those who wish to eliminate it... So too does Pakistan have a strong security state because of the terror nation SOUTH of it that wishes to exterminate it.

Pakistan Strong! Pakistan First!

 

[VCheng]

The only FACT is that you have absolutely nothing to back up your scornful claims and contemptuous allegations. You are acting as an insistent crusader against Pakistan and it's prime institutions.

Let's start here: In your opinion, has the SC been used as a tool to get rid of inconvenient governments in the past or not? If so, then is there anything to suggest that its past use as a tool to apply a legal veneer has changed this time around?

(I am no crusader of any kind, but only an observer of the truth, without fear or favor.)

In any case, what happened in the past stays there. But I would want the same thing for this present government too: to fulfill its term and its promises without illegal invisible interference. The people of Pakistan deserve better than this habitual criminal behavior.

That is a problem the Indian Hindutva have... Not us generous pure hearted ones...

Hate is always a problem for the hater, no matter who or what, never for the target.

Just as you have a strong security state of Israel because it is surrounded by those who wish to eliminate it... So too does Pakistan have a strong security state because of the terror nation SOUTH of it that wishes to exterminate it.

That claim held true until Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons. Now, it is the lack of social development and resources that is the real internal danger because its nuclear weapons provide and impenetrable security umbrella no one will ever wish to test. However, its economic collapse will achieve the same purpose without firing a shot.

 

[FuturePAF]

Until land reforms it will be difficult. I have spent 5 years trying to buy about 1000 kanals and to date no land is clean...all have family issues

What kind of reforms other than naming rightful property owners would you suggest?

 

[Clutch]

That claim held true until Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons. Now, it is the lack of social development and resources that is the real internal danger because its nuclear weapons provide and impenetrable security umbrella no one will ever wish to test. However, its economic collapse will achieve the same purpose without firing a shot.

You don't tell us what to do or think. We do.. Pakistan like Israel is a nuclear state surrounded by terrorist nations.

Pakistan first!

 

[Yaseen1]

Then why those who handpicked rulers are not punished ik should cannot do anything to them as they were part of establishment in past and included top army leadership of that time there is no guarantee that it would not happen in future again

 

[VCheng]

You don't tell us what to do or think. We do.. Pakistan like Israel is a nuclear state surrounded by terrorist nations.

Pakistan first!

Yes, but you should also compare the indices of social development between the two countries.

 

[Verve]

The fact remains that the SC played its assigned role in ousting the elected government once again.

Nawaz and Gillani were PM, not the governments.

How foolishly manipulative of you to equate disqualification of a PM to ousting of an elected government!

 

[VCheng]

Nawaz and Gillani were PM, not the governments.

How foolishly manipulative of you to equate disqualification of a PM to ousting of an elected government!

And how disingenuous of you to ignore what happened after the PM was removed.