And on that note:
PM reconstitutes Council of Islamic Ideology
------------------------------------------
A possible precursor to 'Islamic cover' for future reforms and the military operations, such as you suggested?
The CII has been around for ages. It has had a controversial existence since its constitution in '62 more so personally for me because of its biased stance on women's issues (read: divorce and domestic violence). In fact it stirred controversy last year when it refused to give women the right to divorce. So yes I doubt its credentials, regardless of its members then or now. also by its own charter it does not need to have a fair represention of the different sects on its panel, so it's decisions will be difficult to accept or implement. The CII played little role in the sketching of the Madrassa Reforms.
@ all-green: I don't think you are clear on the madrassa reforms issue
Here's a link from Asia Times online from 2007 (when Gen. Musharraf was still in power. I have put some extracts of interest here.
Asia Times Online :: South Asia news - More muscle to Pakistan's madrassas
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2002, President General Pervez Musharraf warned that the greatest danger facing Pakistan came not from outside, but from Pakistan's own home-grown Islamist radicals - "a danger", he said, "that is eating us from within".
This danger, more than five years later, has assumed menacing proportions. The rapid escalation of violence orchestrated by Islamist extremists across Pakistan in recent times and cumulative efforts to further radicalize the country have now led Musharraf's military regime to revisit the idea of madrassa (seminary) reforms.
Most of the officially estimated 13,000 seminaries (unofficial estimates range between 15,000 and 25,000, and in some cases go as high as 40,000) in Pakistan, with an approximate enrollment of 1.5 million students, have squarely rejected the tentative reforms - in essence requiring the registration of madrassas and the maintenance of accounts, including records of domestic and foreign donors, as well as the teaching of "secular" subjects as part of the curriculum - initiated by the government in 2003.
They have opposed all changes, alleging that the reforms constituted a conspiracy to "secularize" (that is, de-Islamize) the education system at the behest of the United States. The networks and support structures of Islamist extremism in Pakistan, painstakingly constructed through the Pakistan-Afghanistan arc, have little evident interest in engaging with the president's "enlightened moderation".
Speaking on the status of education in Pakistan, Education Minister Javed Ashraf Qazi disclosed, at the Civil Service Academy in Lahore in the first week of April, that there were
5,459 madrassas in Punjab province; 2,843 in NWFP; 1,935 in Sindh; 1,193 in the Northern Areas; 769 in Balochistan; 586 in "Azad" (Pakistan-occupied) Kashmir; 135 in the Federally Administrated Tribal Areas; and 77 in the capital, Islamabad.
A majority of the extremist seminaries that preach and support militant violence follow the Deobandi sect and are associated with the Wafaq-ul-Madaris, the main confederacy of seminaries. According to the International Crisis Group (ICG), "The two factions of the Deobandi political parties, JUI-Fazlur Rehman [Jamaat-e-Ulema-Islam faction headed by Maulana Fazlur Rehman] and JUI-Samiul Haq, run over 65% of all madrassas in Pakistan." Rehman and Haq are widely considered to be the primary backers of the Taliban.
One of the principal instruments of reform and government regulation of madrassas was the proposed registration process. Equally important is the content of subjects taught to students. Aimed at mainstreaming these religious schools, the government had initiated efforts to introduce subjects such as English, general science and mathematics.
The ulema (religious leaders), however, claimed that the registration process was intended to curb the "independence and sovereignty" of madrassas and was, consequently, not acceptable. Five years after its inception, the Madrassa Reform Project has been an unambiguous failure
(skipped)
The madrassa, as a medium of radical Islam, knows too well that the Pakistani state is fragile. For instance, reports indicate that intelligence agencies have warned the government of potential suicide attacks if any military action is initiated against the pro-Taliban Lal Masjid (Red Mosque) and the Jamia Hafsa seminary in Islamabad.
A report submitted to the federal government disclosed:
These two buildings host a large number of trained suicide bombers and a reasonable stockpile of arms ... if any action is taken, they may retaliate with suicide attacks, resulting in heavy casualties ... Maulana Abdul Aziz, prayer leader of Lal Masjid, and his brother Abdul Rashid Ghazi, head of Jamia Hafsa, enjoy the complete backing of at least 18 religious seminaries located in the federal capital and receive constant support, in kind, from these seminaries.
The report also mentioned that suicide bombers involved in the January 26 attack on the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad and the February 6 attack at the parking lot of Islamabad International Airport were linked to the seminary.
Ominously, the report warns further, "The real cause of concern is that the number of would-be female suicide bombers is quite large compared [with] male students and, if action were to be taken, at least 150 casualties are feared."
Not surprisingly, Musharraf has publicly ruled out the use of force to address the crisis generated by students
[skipped]
The collapse of the seminary-reform project is a clear indication that Islamabad is either apathetic or does not have the capacity to dismantle the extremist infrastructure across the country. Summing up his country's mood, Shafqat Mahmood, a former member of Parliament, aptly noted: "Quiet seriously, we are in a terrible mess."
----------------------------------------------------------------
The number of these seminaries is the highest at 5000 plus in the Punjab.
So has anyone been following this and knows its progress in 2009 have the reforms been abandoned by the government for good?