Dedication to Chechens

[Zaalim]

Allah hu Akhbar


We will come for you Indians that support genocide and injustice.

Pakistan is still here, banniyas.

 

[doppelganger]

And you lecture Pakistanis on human rights. Another Indian extremist added to my ever growing list of hypocritical Indian members on PDF. Welcome to the club.

I do not lecture anyone when it comes to taking on an enemy of the state. I think I have ben consistent in that, be it for India or Pakistan or France or any other state that finds itself and its people under attack. No mercy. Kill them faster and more efficiently and in far greater numbers than they kill yours. There really is no other way.

Problem with Pakistan is that a lot of your brutality is wasted on relative doves, while the actual enemies of the state are pampered and given protection.

Do you feel offended because we laud the Russians or do you feel offended because it was muslims at the receiving end of brutality. For a change?

Can you be honest?

Allah hu Akhbar

We will come for you Indians that support genocide and injustice.

Pakistan is still here, banniyas.

Define We.

 

[Pakistani E]

I do not lecture anyone when it comes to taking on an enemy of the state.

Problem with Pakistan is that a lot of your brutality is wasted on relative doves, while the actual enemies of the state are pampered and given protection.

Do you feel offended because we laud the Russians or do you feel offended because it was muslims at the receiving end of brutality. For a change?

Can you be honest?

I don't feel offended at all. I laugh at the Indian self declared champions of minorities in Pakistan when something bad happens there, yet you only have to look at their other posts to see that their view on human rights is actually based on double standards.

I criticize Pakistan on Human rights whenever I get the chance, but the difference between me and you is that I call out atrocities wherever they are committed. I don't support terrorism in Chechnya or India. I don't support state back terrorism either, Russian troops committed excessive atrocities during the war. And here you are praising them, only because it is the Muslims at the receiving end.

Can you be honest and accept that you are no different from other extremists who justify violence against people they don't like?

 

[Zaalim]

I do not lecture anyone when it comes to taking on an enemy of the state. I think I have ben consistent in that, be it for India or Pakistan or France or any other state that finds itself and its people under attack. No mercy. Kill them faster and more efficiently and in far greater numbers than they kill yours. There really is no other way.

Problem with Pakistan is that a lot of your brutality is wasted on relative doves, while the actual enemies of the state are pampered and given protection.

Do you feel offended because we laud the Russians or do you feel offended because it was muslims at the receiving end of brutality. For a change?

Can you be honest?



Define We.

Muslims, but especially Pakistanis.

We are coming for you dotheads.

 

[doppelganger]

I don't feel offended at all. I laugh at the Indian self declared champions of minorities in Pakistan when something bad happens there, yet you only have to look at their other posts to see that their view on human rights is actually based on double standards.

I criticize Pakistan on Human rights whenever I get the chance, but the difference between me and you is that I call out atrocities wherever they are committed. I don't support terrorism in Chechnya or India. I don't support state back terrorism either, Russian troops committed excessive atrocities during the war. And here you are praising them, only because it is the Muslims at the receiving end.

Can you be honest and accept that you are no different from other extremists who justify violence against people they don't like?

Thank you for your reply. Let me answer in kind.

Firstly, let me be honest. India, and us Hindus, have suffered a lot from Islamic terrorism. We still are. It is nowhere over. So wherever in the world we see another state facing the same, fighting the same, we feel a kindred spirit, a oneness.

Be it Israel, be it Russia, be it China, be it Myanmar, be it USA, be it UK, be it Spain, be it France, be it Australia, or in fact be it any of the multitude of muslim countries around the world who are equally at war, like yours as well.

It is not muslims we like seeing being killed, it is fanatical zealot muslims who want to terrorize everyone by death and dstruction and violence and their outdated 7th century versions of faith which they want to impose, those are the ones we like to see being butchered in industrial quantities. By the train load, by the ship load, entire football stadia packed to the rafters load. You get the idea.

And yes, having seen what muslim extremists can do to my own people, I for one would not bat an eyelid if my forces raze an entire village if found giving shelter or support to these same guys. Take them away so that they are never seen again. Put pressure on their families till someone somewhere talks. No problem. No guilt pangs either.

It is a war we are in. If I and mine do not do what you chide us for doing (hypocritically may I add), then they will do it to us, first opportunity they get.

Which is why I am a big fan of the Russian methods. Brutal. Go in with tanks and heavy artillery. Offer truce if need be for safe passage. And under a white flag wipe out an entire village of retreating insurgents.

Let them also learn that in this war there will be no truce.

Hope I have explained my very straightforward non ambiguous stand to you. No double speak, no double standards here.

 

[Azizam]

Another thread glorifying terrorism few thousand kilometres away. Before anyone tells me that they are not terrorists, take a look at what they did to Beslan children who by the way are not even ethnic Russians.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

And here you are praising them, only because it is the Muslims at the receiving end.

Here you are wrong. We(so called Indian right) have also supported Sri Lanka to weed out their not-Muslim insurgency.

Muslims, but especially Pakistanis.

We are coming for you dotheads.

But I don't WANT to marry you.

 

[doppelganger]

Oye @Zarvan @SarthakGanguly @Zaalim @Pakistani Exile @Imran Rashid @levina @Spring Onion ji

The color of my name has changed!

Mai senior member ban gaya! Balle balle!!!!

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Thank you for your reply. Let me answer in kind.

Firstly, let me be honest. India, and us Hindus, have suffered a lot from Islamic terrorism. We still are. It is nowhere over. So wherever in the world we see another state facing the same, fighting the same, we feel a kindred spirit, a oneness.

Be it Israel, be it Russia, be it China, be it Myanmar, be it USA, be it UK, be it Spain, be it France, be it Australia, or in fact be it any of the multitude of muslim countries around the world who are equally at war, like yours as well.

It is not muslims we like seeing being killed, it is fanatical zealot muslims who want to terrorize everyone by death and dstruction and violence and their outdated 7th century versions of faith which they want to impose, those are the ones we like to see being butchered in industrial quantities. By the train load, by the ship load, entire football stadia packed to the rafters load. You get the idea.

And yes, having seen what muslim extremists can do to my own people, I for one would not bat an eyelid if my forces raze an entire village if found giving shelter or support to these same guys. Take them away so that they are never seen again. Put pressure on their families till someone somewhere talks. No problem. No guilt pangs either.

It is a war we are in. If I and mine do not do what you chide us for doing (hypocritically may I add), then they will do it to us, first opportunity they get.

Which is why I am a big fan of the Russian methods. Brutal. Go in with tanks and heavy artillery. Offer truce if need be for safe passage. And under a white flag wipe out an entire village of retreating insurgents.

Let them also learn that in this war there will be no truce.

Hope I have explained my very straightforward non ambiguous stand to you. No double speak, no double standards here.

When you stoop down to the level of a criminal, you become a criminal yourself. The same can be said of terrorists. Terrorists using the Muslim label (including these Chechens) hope that non-Muslims will kill indiscriminately and terrorize. That will justify their cause.

 

[doppelganger]

When you stoop down to the level of a criminal, you become a criminal yourself. The same can be said of terrorists. Terrorists using the Muslim label (including these Chechens) hope that non-Muslims will kill indiscriminately and terrorize. That will justify their cause.

So be it!

Call me criminal. Call me state sponsored genocidal maniac. Call me anything.

I want to live. And for that they have to die.

Its really not so complicated. And there is no ego in taking their own methods and perfecting them with superior resources and bandwidth.

 

[jamahir]

thread reported.

this thead supports nato-supported terrorists, created against russia.

idiots, it is chechens who govern chechnya.

 

[PlanetWarrior]

So be it!

Call me criminal. Call me state sponsored genocidal maniac. Call me anything.

I want to live. And for that they have to die.

Its really not so complicated. And there is no ego in taking their own methods and perfecting them with superior resources and bandwidth.

I once watched this panel discussion on tv which included a former CIA director. He was asked whether he believed that the US war on Iraq served any purpose even if Saddam had WMDs. His response was surprising. He replied with an emphatic NO. He then went on to point out that the so called Islamic world doesn't exist. Muslim nations are fragmented and tend to harbor more animosity towards each other than against even Israel for example. He then noted that the greatest fear which he had was that Bush would unite the Muslim nations into an Islamic world led by zealots who would cause a world war 3 based on religion.

Now the massacre of those Russian school kids was heart wrenching. But what was different between those kids and the kids of Peshawar save for religion. Do the so-called Islamic radicals of Peshawar pause to consider that these are Muslim kids we are tormenting and planning to savagely execute? The people who commit these atrocities do so for a political purpose and not a religious one. Some stupid Muslims fall for their agenda since every society has its share of idiots who can be hoodwinked. The majority of the Muslims however regard scum as scum and nothing more or less. More Muslims die at the hands of so-called Islamic radicals than non-Muslims do. Just look at the middle east, count the numbers and work it out for yourself. We don't really get horrified when we read that 200 Shias or 250 Sunnis were executed at the hands of ISIS. We pass by that news with just a pause to reflect whether the oil price rose as a consequence of that. Yet we get horrified and demand action against ISIS when a westerner is executed by ISIS or a few journos are killed in France for drawing cartoons of the Muslim prophet. When we do that, we are telling Muslims that it is okay for you to be killed by terrorists but please lay off us. We are creating the them versus us mentality and yet we accuse Muslims of doing so. On that point, your doctrine is flawed for the main reason of what is the difference between your doctrine and the doctrine of ISIS? Just kill them if they peeve us off and if any innocent Muslims are slaughtered as a result then that is too bad.

 

[doppelganger]

I once watched this panel discussion on tv which included a former CIA director. He was asked whether he believed that the US war on Iraq served any purpose even if Saddam had WMDs. His response was surprising. He replied with an emphatic NO. He then went on to point out that the so called Islamic world doesn't exist. Muslim nations are fragmented and tend to harbor more animosity towards each other than against even Israel for example. He then noted that the greatest fear which he had was that Bush would unite the Muslim nations into an Islamic world led by zealots who would cause a world war 3 based on religion.

Now the massacre of those Russian school kids was heart wrenching. But what was different between those kids and the kids of Peshawar save for religion. Do the so-called Islamic radicals of Peshawar pause to consider that these are Muslim kids we are tormenting and planning to savagely execute? The people who commit these atrocities do so for a political purpose and not a religious one. Some stupid Muslims fall for their agenda since every society has its share of idiots who can be hoodwinked. The majority of the Muslims however regard scum as scum and nothing more or less. More Muslims die at the hands of so-called Islamic radicals than non-Muslims do. Just look at the middle east, count the numbers and work it out for yourself. We don't really get horrified when we read that 200 Shias or 250 Sunnis were executed at the hands of ISIS. We pass by that news with just a pause to reflect whether the oil price rose as a consequence of that. Yet we get horrified and demand action against ISIS when a westerner is executed by ISIS or a few journos are killed in France for drawing cartoons of the Muslim prophet. When we do that, we are telling Muslims that it is okay for you to be killed by terrorists but please lay off us. We are creating the them versus us mentality and yet we accuse Muslims of doing so. On that point, your doctrine is flawed for the main reason of what is the difference between your doctrine and the doctrine of ISIS? Just kill them if they peeve us off and if any innocent Muslims are slaughtered as a result then that is too bad.

I'm sorry, I got all of what you said, but cannot connect the dots to how it is relevant here.

I do not have the luxury of being horrified at what they are doing to each other (even though honestly I am when I hear ISIS and BOko Haram type numbers that boggles the comprehension of an average human mind).

I do not have the luxury because it is far away, I am not connected and they are not my people, and I have my hands full at home with my own people dying to the same scourge.

I do not buy into this paradigm that you have to treat killers with kids gloves for fear of giving birth to more killers, and more virulent ones. They need no help either in self procreation of their kind, or in sustenance of virulence. They seem to have a bottomless fountainhead on that one.

There is only one thing they respect, and that is brutality. Violence. Barbarism. It is steeped in their tribal lore, and hence part of their warped value system. These are attributes they can relate to. They do not fear civility and decency. They hold it in great scorn. A sign of the weakness of their enemy. A sign that their God has chosen them to smite down those of such frailties.

One thing that invariably gets their attention is when someone goes completely MONGOL on them. It never fails.

Tell me one thing buddy. How many of these loony tunes are going to take on the Russian state ever again?

That is the fear of God I want India to instil in them. Learn. Assimilate. Put into practice.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

When you stoop down to the level of a criminal, you become a criminal yourself.

The only way to end a criminal(be it Nazis, ISIS, etc) is to kill him/her.

 

[Zarvan]