What's new

Debunking Indian claims of F-16 firing AIM-120C AMRAAM

.
Oh come on. You have a "proof" after all. Use it and expose us.

Come on. Let's try again.

Use your "proof" to show that it was fired by the same offensive formation that you claimed to engage and shot down. Try it ;)

You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)
 
.
India never claimed F-16 fell on its side of LoC.

Actually it went like this -

Pakistan: No F-16 was used, JF-17s were in fray
India: (shows AMRAAM)
Pakistan: ........
Lol even I can come up with such pieces and say that they are indian BVR missile s.. they aren’t hard to make..
 
.
These Indians are stupid af.

Clearly, Pakistan is trying to de-escalate the situation by not releasing combat footage and claiming the death of Indian pilots.

There is a likely chance that the 2nd pilot was admitted to the CMH, but died. Pakistan is being clever not publicly stating he died as that would create fury among Indians and lead to war.
 
.
D0gYscyX0AECCP4.jpg
 
.
.
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)

No sanctions are coming. Ttp never had an airforce for which we needed a bvr missile. USA knew that.

Now come on. Use your "proof" to show that it was fired by the same formation that you claimed to engage

If you can use this missile to prove you shot down a f16 then use it to prove it was fired by the same formation. ;)

For your hint. Nobody tried hard enough. Paf and ISPR simply rejected using f16. It is you guys who are trying hard to prove that you shot down a f16.
 
.
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)
If they don’t than will you’ll Indian airforce accept and apologies for making false claims ?
 
.
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)
So now you want ur BF to come up and take the revenge for you. Jo phanti pari thai tum logon ko, tum us kai badlay Amreeca sa pabandian lagwana chahtay ho :D.

There is a saying in "ungal do to chappay ki jaga rakho"
 
.
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)

You are right the American gave the AAMRAMs so that we can be the first airforce to use them in ground attacks to kill Pakistani Taliban.

Get some sense, why would they sell AAMRAMs to us?
 
. . . .
yeah.. that story is now catching fire at the sudden disappearance of the second pilot who was in Hospital and some sites going as far as saying that he was a PAF pilot .. can't be that DG ISPR said something, PM said something and suddenly all of that is wrong and there is only 1 guy...

if F-16 was down, we dont need to hide from Public! its the Indian government who is hiding behind the curtains, and not providing any evidences.
 
.
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.

Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)
Since you guys seem so sure on this....pease share the source of this info to back your claims and refute us.....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom