kaku1
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2010
- Messages
- 3,755
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Yaar, AQ and Taliban is enemy of India,, since 1990s, from when Pakistan was fully supporting to wage war on India.
How much you succeeded?
Dear India, you have been warned.
- Thread starter Kompromat
- Start date
How much you succeeded?
rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
as i said , you wont last with 10 cuts ... and as i said , i never heard any of this 1000 cuts crap from a reliable sources , so if you have any please share
GURU DUTT
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,363
- Reaction score
- -75
- Country
- Location
well trust me we are least botherred cause this time response will be so massive that not a blade of grass will grow in your sector forget about gorillas ....you know what i mean
Stephen Cohen
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,456
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
GURU DUTT
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,363
- Reaction score
- -75
- Country
- Location
its not 1990s dear its ever since 25th dec 1971
kaku1
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2010
- Messages
- 3,755
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
as i said , you wont last with 10 cuts ... and as i said , i never heard any of this 1000 cuts crap from a reliable sources , so if you have any please share
So, waging war against India with 1000 cuts is not Pak policy? So, why in 90s Pak supported terrorist groups in Azad Kashmir and Taliban?
You are too much.
rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
lol you call that full scale war ? dude , you have no idea ...
look at Pakistan's Tribal Regions , we are fighting these Mudafcukers from 13 years now , our training and equipment is same as you .. and now we are even better than any other trained aRmy because of our Experience ..
so you will know once they get the support from Inside ..
ares
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 5,483
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
As usual Pakistan goverment is unaware, just empty threats are made from time to time..for local consumption.
FO unaware of fresh proof against RAW
BAQIR SAJJAD SYED — UPDATED MAY 08, 2015 11:23AM
WHATSAPP
15 COMMENTS
PRINT
A view of the Foreign Office in Islamabad. - Photo by Suhail Yusuf
ISLAMABAD: The Foreign Office appeared ignorant on Thursday about any fresh evidence of the Indian intelligence agency RAW’s growing involvement with terrorism in the country – something that prompted army’s top brass to flag the issue at its monthly corps commanders meeting recently.
Responding to a question whether the government was taking up the issue of RAW’s support of terrorist activities in Pakistan with the Indian government, newly-appointed FO spokesman Qazi Khalilullah said the matter had been discussed with New Delhi in the past.
He, however, had to say if it was being raised again, particularly after the military leaders went public with their concerns.
“We have been taking up the issue of Indian involvement in various parts of Pakistan from time to time, particularly when we have talks with them. I would like to recall that after the visit of the Indian foreign secretary to Pakistan in March, the foreign secretary had briefed the media about the Indian involvement in Fata and Balochistan,” Mr Khalilullah said.
A corps commanders meeting in an unusual statement earlier this week said: “The conference took serious notice of RAW’s involvement in whipping up terrorism in Pakistan.”
Spokesman says Pakistan will continue to promote cooperation with Afghanistan
Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif had almost three weeks ago also pointed to involvement of “foreign intelligence agencies” in unrest in Balochistan.
Military officials in their background conversations had said that there was fresh intelligence about RAW’s growing involvement in terrorist acts in Karachi, Fata and Balochistan.
In reply to a question about an Indian letter to the UN Security Council’s Al Qaeda sanctions committee on principal Mumbai attack accused Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi’s release on bail by a Pakistani court, the spokesman said all requirements of the committee had already been complied with.
“The sanctions committee required international travel ban, arms embargo and freezing of assets. All these measures have been taken and are highlighted during our interaction with our international partners,” Mr Khalilullah said.
The sanctions committee is set to take up the Indian letter shortly.
Lakhvi was listed by the sanctions committee in December 2008 for “participating in the financing, planning, facilitating, preparing or perpetrating of acts of activities by, in conjunction with, under the name of, on behalf or in support of” Lashkar-i-Taiba and Al Qaeda.
The Indian position is that his release on bail constituted violation of the provisions of the sanctions committee.
AFGHANISTAN: Reacting to critical statements about Pakistan by Afghan leaders during a recent parliamentary debate on Taliban’s Spring Offensive, the spokesman said: “Pakistan is doing all it can to promote peace and reconciliation process in Afghanistan.”
He maintained that Pakistan was making “all possible efforts to promote cooperation with Afghanistan that is mutually beneficial” and it would continue with this policy.
Afghan National Security Adviser Hanif Atmar had told the Afghan parliament that the issue had been raised with Pakistani leaders asking them to destroy the Taliban sanctuaries.
Mr Atmar further said the militants had safe havens across the border, but those were not being targeted.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is planning to visit Kabul in coming weeks.
Mr Khalilullah said: “The objective of the visit always is to further promote bilateral relationship and understanding and explore new avenues of cooperation.”
Answering a question about PPP leader Asif Ali Zardari’s visit to Kabul, he said the government encouraged political contacts between the two countries.
Published in Dawn, May 8th, 2015
On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store |Google Play
FO unaware of fresh proof against RAW
BAQIR SAJJAD SYED — UPDATED MAY 08, 2015 11:23AM
15 COMMENTS
PRINT
A view of the Foreign Office in Islamabad. - Photo by Suhail Yusuf
ISLAMABAD: The Foreign Office appeared ignorant on Thursday about any fresh evidence of the Indian intelligence agency RAW’s growing involvement with terrorism in the country – something that prompted army’s top brass to flag the issue at its monthly corps commanders meeting recently.
Responding to a question whether the government was taking up the issue of RAW’s support of terrorist activities in Pakistan with the Indian government, newly-appointed FO spokesman Qazi Khalilullah said the matter had been discussed with New Delhi in the past.
He, however, had to say if it was being raised again, particularly after the military leaders went public with their concerns.
“We have been taking up the issue of Indian involvement in various parts of Pakistan from time to time, particularly when we have talks with them. I would like to recall that after the visit of the Indian foreign secretary to Pakistan in March, the foreign secretary had briefed the media about the Indian involvement in Fata and Balochistan,” Mr Khalilullah said.
A corps commanders meeting in an unusual statement earlier this week said: “The conference took serious notice of RAW’s involvement in whipping up terrorism in Pakistan.”
Spokesman says Pakistan will continue to promote cooperation with Afghanistan
Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif had almost three weeks ago also pointed to involvement of “foreign intelligence agencies” in unrest in Balochistan.
Military officials in their background conversations had said that there was fresh intelligence about RAW’s growing involvement in terrorist acts in Karachi, Fata and Balochistan.
In reply to a question about an Indian letter to the UN Security Council’s Al Qaeda sanctions committee on principal Mumbai attack accused Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi’s release on bail by a Pakistani court, the spokesman said all requirements of the committee had already been complied with.
“The sanctions committee required international travel ban, arms embargo and freezing of assets. All these measures have been taken and are highlighted during our interaction with our international partners,” Mr Khalilullah said.
The sanctions committee is set to take up the Indian letter shortly.
Lakhvi was listed by the sanctions committee in December 2008 for “participating in the financing, planning, facilitating, preparing or perpetrating of acts of activities by, in conjunction with, under the name of, on behalf or in support of” Lashkar-i-Taiba and Al Qaeda.
The Indian position is that his release on bail constituted violation of the provisions of the sanctions committee.
AFGHANISTAN: Reacting to critical statements about Pakistan by Afghan leaders during a recent parliamentary debate on Taliban’s Spring Offensive, the spokesman said: “Pakistan is doing all it can to promote peace and reconciliation process in Afghanistan.”
He maintained that Pakistan was making “all possible efforts to promote cooperation with Afghanistan that is mutually beneficial” and it would continue with this policy.
Afghan National Security Adviser Hanif Atmar had told the Afghan parliament that the issue had been raised with Pakistani leaders asking them to destroy the Taliban sanctuaries.
Mr Atmar further said the militants had safe havens across the border, but those were not being targeted.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is planning to visit Kabul in coming weeks.
Mr Khalilullah said: “The objective of the visit always is to further promote bilateral relationship and understanding and explore new avenues of cooperation.”
Answering a question about PPP leader Asif Ali Zardari’s visit to Kabul, he said the government encouraged political contacts between the two countries.
Published in Dawn, May 8th, 2015
On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store |Google Play
Guynextdoor2
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,286
- Reaction score
- -42
- Country
- Location
Look who's talking
. The thread was opened by an OP on a very common behavioral trait. THE ARRRRRMMMMMYYYY CHIEF said ' I WARN YOU INDIA'. And that's enough to think you have a 56 inch chest. Ok we humor it. But on ground, your Pakistan Air Force has got about 20 to 30 'top line' fighters ( F 16 Block C/D), IAF has 230 MKIs alone. And India is not half as war mngering as you guys. Man you guys live in some world that just doesn't exist on earth
rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
So, waging war against India with 1000 cuts is not Pak policy? So, why in 90s Pak supported terrorist groups in Azad Kashmir and Taliban?
You are too much.
you are making a fool out of yourself , i asked for a Genuine source ... please give me the source .. not the laughing emoticons cause it only makes you look stupid ..
THAT CURRENCY WAS locally produced by the Best intelligence Agency in the world. Also let no one deceive u that ur establishment can actually show the middle finger to House of saud !
rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
Look who's talking
this is not a D!ck Measuring a thread , so Shooooooo
kaku1
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2010
- Messages
- 3,755
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Lol, jus 13 years, we fighting this type of war since 1950.
graphican
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2009
- Messages
- 12,433
- Reaction score
- 48
- Country
- Location
dear sir we have been getting such warning ever since 1947 when ever things start going owt of hands of the pakistani establishment on domestick front mostli deu to there own faults but even if he is serous then so what he will do what he likes and we will not shy away from giving back same or "dispropotionate response"
As if you are prepared to face an equal but opposite response back. We have seen your year long army standing on the boarder and not having a shred of courage to act. Fresh your memory of standoff and thump some chest in your own honor.
Similar threads
