You must be kidding or simply paranoid.
Cuba has its own original people living there. How the hell it could be yours???
About those uninhabited rocks dutch found them? Are you joking?
The blood-sucking colonists killed a lot of aboriginals and then said there was no people ever living there.
I guess the current great u.s.a. was just one step from claiming that north america was virgin territory without anyone ever living there before the so-called protestants coming over???
As for Malvinas, wow, another good one. Tens of thousands miles away, the u.k. found that uninhabited rocks and moved there, while just a couple hundred miles away from Argentina coast, for thousand years, the stupid argentina sailors/fishermen never found this "uninhabited" rocks and never considered it such a good place for fishing stops???
As for your crap last point, take a vote. Well, if taking a vote will decide whether China will reclaim HongKong, I bet HongKong is still not back to China's territory yet. The great Deng Xiaoping told margaret thatcher directly, I do not give a fxxk what you wanted to do, by the time 7/1/1997, we will reclaim HongKong, one way or the other.
So you know what happened next, thatcher tripped when she went down people's hall of China, and China reclaimed HongKong as scheduled.
Argentina just need develop itself faster and becomes stronger. You will reclaim Malvinas sooner or later.
Cuba has its own original people living there. How the hell it could be yours???
About those uninhabited rocks dutch found them? Are you joking?
The blood-sucking colonists killed a lot of aboriginals and then said there was no people ever living there.
I guess the current great u.s.a. was just one step from claiming that north america was virgin territory without anyone ever living there before the so-called protestants coming over???
As for Malvinas, wow, another good one. Tens of thousands miles away, the u.k. found that uninhabited rocks and moved there, while just a couple hundred miles away from Argentina coast, for thousand years, the stupid argentina sailors/fishermen never found this "uninhabited" rocks and never considered it such a good place for fishing stops???
As for your crap last point, take a vote. Well, if taking a vote will decide whether China will reclaim HongKong, I bet HongKong is still not back to China's territory yet. The great Deng Xiaoping told margaret thatcher directly, I do not give a fxxk what you wanted to do, by the time 7/1/1997, we will reclaim HongKong, one way or the other.
So you know what happened next, thatcher tripped when she went down people's hall of China, and China reclaimed HongKong as scheduled.
Argentina just need develop itself faster and becomes stronger. You will reclaim Malvinas sooner or later.
This is maddening. How many times are we going to revisit the Falklands on PDF?
The facts are simple. The Falklands were totally uninhabited rocks in the ocean until GB began colonization. Ever since man set sail, finder's keepers on uninhabited islands. Just because they are physically close to Argentina means jack. Geographic proximity is NOT a key to ownership.
The island of Cuba is MUCH closer to the USA than the Falklands are to Argentina. So are numerous Caribbean Islands. Should they be ours? Aruba, Curacao, and Bonaire are Dutch islands very close to Venezuela. They too were uninhabited rocks when the Dutch found them. Yet Venezuela, for some odd reason, thinks they should own them. Why?
By what measure should Argentina have the Falklands?
- The British colonized first
- The People are descendants of British settlers
- The people WANT to remain part of Great Britain
This last point trumps everything else. Take a vote. Find out what the people want.