What's new

CV-16 Liaoning - Type 001 Aircraft Carrier News & Discussions

img-769657f1b3eb09f0337d74e80f78ba6d.jpg
img-c429369b0d7188baae65a52b7c3d211f.jpg
img-cd9d2f3b1a237b4901810ba58a661886.jpg
img-b67dad1f1c644a08334976864082c50e.jpg
img-46be9f3435c10253277a647d09f6e591.jpg
img-589c893ea9f62975a9109e48b50fe3fb.jpg
img-38a690b2fa7744814a2e7c786bb36e80.jpg

http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2018-04/24/content_8013780.htm
 
Chinese aircraft carrier formation returns after live-fire drills
Source: Xinhua | 2018-04-26 21:51:34 | Editor: pengying

QINGDAO, April 26 (Xinhua) -- China's Liaoning aircraft carrier formation Thursday returned to a military port in Qingdao, east China's Shandong Province, after more than 10 days of live-fire exercises.

The formation took part in a navy review in the South China Sea on April 12. After that, the formation sailed through the Bashi Channel into the West Pacific, and then voyaged through the Miyako Strait to reach the East China Sea. It conducted high-sea training in these waters.

The live combat drills included shipborne fighter planes taking off and landing in complex conditions, and confrontations in water and airspace, aiming to enhance the formation's combat capability.

The drills concluded successfully, with the formation's combat capability tested and improved.

source:http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-04/26/c_137139432.htm
 
@LKJ86, Your following batch of 9 pics was just "repeated" by the same user at the Liaoning thread in SDF... without any due credit.
Don't you consider to put some simple watermark at some "key pics", the most prominent ones within a series (such as "Via PDF"), no need for all pics in a batch if you feel it's troublesome. But if you feel it's okay for such transfer, then I will say no more in your case :) it's your call... I simply notify you.
 
@LKJ86, Your following batch of 9 pics was just "repeated" by the same user at the Liaoning thread in SDF... without any due credit.
Don't you consider to put some simple watermark at some "key pics", the most prominent ones within a series (such as "Via PDF"), no need for all pics in a batch if you feel it's troublesome. But if you feel it's okay for such transfer, then I will say no more in your case :) it's your call... I simply notify you.
Hi, bro. Thanks for reminding.
I am happy to post interesting pics here, and do my best to provide their sources or remain their original watermarks, to make people find the original copy easier. So, it is hard to avoid that the pics were "repeated" by others.
 
Hi, bro. Thanks for reminding.
I am happy to post interesting pics here, and do my best to provide their sources or remain their original watermakrs, to make people find the original copy easier. So, it is hard to avoid that the pics were "repeated" by others.
Yes, you're damned right for those pics upload with obvious source, open link :D
My bad, I should say that I mean those "significant" pics with NO obvious source (so, not this kind of case). I think you occasionally upload some significant pics with no obvious (open) source :p: That's where your own watermark will matter.
 
Yes, you're damned right for those pics upload with obvious source, open link :D
My bad, I should say that I mean those "significant" pics with NO obvious source (so, not this kind of case). I think you occasionally upload some significant pics with no obvious (open) source :p: That's where your own watermark will matter.
Besides, I don't know the websits like SDF, and it is a impossible job for me to check whether the pics have been posted or not. Maybe I also do the "repeated" work unwittingly.:p:
 
Last edited:
vs
7ad02386a14b6123f395b22a6dad9842-jpg.474509
 

Attachments

  • 24bbda6a9bb7879b97d1c84fe265a94e.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 61
  • 8ef39bb18bcee902992ee10d55d1b72e.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 33
  • 7ad02386a14b6123f395b22a6dad9842.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 29
  • 1b6d294865acfbb85b96cc8bbcb99d43.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 46
  • 7ad02386a14b6123f395b22a6dad9842.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 602
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom