do you support the use of WP against women and Children or not?
I support lawful warfare.
Lawful warfare implies separation of combatants from civilians.
If combatants intermix with civilians, civilians will get killed.
The criminals are then the combatants, which does not try to protect their civilians.
If there are lots of civilians in an area, the defender can agree with the attacker to designate
the area as an "Open City". This means that the area is not defended,
and cannot be legally attacked. This protects the civilians.
As I pointed out, there are no laws governing "Use of WP" so stop the propaganda,
and start discussing what is legal and what is not.
A law that would make sense is to outlaw the use of combatants in cities.
Since cities always contains a large number of civilians, they will die
as long as warfare in cities are allowed.
was it our mistake to ask for a separate homeland?
and what should we call a country who have violated around 70 UN resolutions?
I guess actually doing something else than whining is too much effort.
I am sure you feel good about whining.