Cover up of 1971, lost half century!!

[VkdIndian]

And we are still around and despite everything we are a bigger pain in the Indian A$$ than in 1971.

Really?
That is the redemption of 1971 fiasco you are happy with?

Establishment has been selling a theory that it was isolated and couldnt provide support to its forces in the East. That they were outnumbered and blah blah blah. East had language difference and we were bound to get separated at some stage. All these are nothing but lies to cover bigger lies that were started from the day one after independence in 1947.

From 1947 to 1971 they were able to get only one squadron of fighters for the defence of a territory surrounded by an adversary from 3 sides?
The numbers of Army formations and equipment provided for security of East is even more laughable. The elite in the West never considered East as equal partners in the country.

Corrupt to the core and degenerated even from normal social norms, these elites played every dirty trick in the books to retain power.

Having failed, they sold a narrative that was taught to the naive population that revered them. A narrative parroted by quite a few on pdf.

 

[Baburfromsarmarkand]

Really?
That is the redemption of 1971 fiasco you are happy with?

Establishment has been selling a theory that it was isolated and couldnt provide support to its forces in the East. That they were outnumbered and blah blah blah. East had language difference and we were bound to get separated at some stage. All these are nothing but lies to cover bigger lies that were started from the day one after independence in 1947.

From 1947 to 1971 they were able to get only one squadron of fighters for the defence of a territory surrounded by an adversary from 3 sides?
The numbers of Army formations and equipment provided for security of East is even more laughable. The elite in the West never considered East as equal partners in the country.

Corrupt to the core and degenerated even from normal social norms, these elites played every dirty trick in the books to retain power.

Having failed, they sold a narrative that was taught to the naive population that revered them. A narrative parroted by quite a few on pdf.

Yeah its pretty retarded, considering the British kept all territories under their writ in the era of telegraphs. These ppl are experts at making excuses.

 

[Bossman]

We are not.
Reality is so much painful so better flatly deny it!



The traitors consider themselves THE STATE.
This Farm Field Marshall was so coward like Bajwa, his legs were shivering and sweat on brows when chines in 1962 informed him Kashmir border vacant go get it, he slammed to ground and started working that Fatima Jinnah is traitor.
What kind of abomination ruled us.

If Ayub was scared of attacking in1962 than why did he attack in 1965. You contradicted yourself with your own statement.

If this is the PTI narrative, I am really disappointed. They now willing to sleep with the enemy to justify their half truth narrative. This is the first a Pakistani (supposedly) and defended an Indian against me on this forum. As I said earlier people like you are like QAnon conspiracy theorist in the US. It’s is psychological mind set. They feel that they access to special information, which makes them standout and superior but in reality they are a bunch of semi literate idiots. I think access to information from the internet had to do with it.

 

[imadul]

If Ayub was scared of attacking in1962 than why did he attack in 1965. You contradicted yourself with your own statement.

If this is the PTI narrative, I am really disappointed. They now willing to sleep with the enemy to justify their half truth narrative. This is the first a Pakistani (supposedly) and defended an Indian against me on this forum. As I said earlier people like you are like QAnon conspiracy theorist in the US. It’s is psychological mind set. They feel that they access to special information, which makes them standout and superior but in reality they are a bunch of semi literate idiots. I think access to information from the internet had to do with it.

.
You are light on Pakistan history.
Ayub was bona-fide coward.
No one even have to point out what opportunity Pakistan missed in 1962 because of sell out coward leadership. They just reoccupoy Pakistan again and again.
1965 was an attempt to clear the stain, but he again sold out. And 1971 was a revenge on Pakistan.
Pakistan History is splattered with treachery and cowardice of military.
This Army is bred to conquer Pakistan only and humiliate and kill Pakistanis only because they still serve Lord Clive.

 

[TheSolution]

.
You are light on Pakistan history.
Ayub was bona-fide coward.
No one even have to point out what opportunity Pakistan missed in 1962 because of sell out coward leadership. They just reoccupoy Pakistan again and again.
1965 was an attempt to clear the stain, but he again sold out. And 1971 was a revenge on Pakistan.
Pakistan History is splattered with treachery and cowardice of military.
This Army is bred to conquer Pakistan only and humiliate and kill Pakistanis only because they still serve Lord Clive.

Ayub Khan was not a coward

Bajwa is arguably the only true coward leader we've had

 

[imadul]

Ayub Khan was not a coward

Bajwa is arguably the only true coward leader we've had

New time...
New cowards
Every kind.
But everyone is shameful.
Ayub, Yahya, AK Niazi, Zia, Musharraf, Haji, Hafiz, all have their own cowardice colors.
The commonality, conquer own country. But this is not their own country, occupied territories.

 

[TheSolution]

New time...
New cowards
Every kind.
But everyone is shameful.
Ayub, Yahya, AK Niazi, Zia, Musharraf, Haji, Hafiz, all have their own cowardice colors.
The commonality, conquer own country. But this is not their own country, occupied territories.

Man I don't know what you're babbling on about, I think you're rewriting history because of your youthiya disease

 

[SQ8]

Ayub Khan was not a coward

Bajwa is arguably the only true coward leader we've had

Ayub Khan ran away from his post well before Pakistan - the man enforced the seed of racial discrimination against the Bengalis and then ran away citing “I wont be responsible for the destruction of Pakistan” when faced with the consequences.

All military dictators have done more damage to Pakistan and worst of all to the merit and accountability within the military itself. Because no brilliant and accomplished officer will circumvent civilian rule - only mediocre sycophants seek to rule by force and then supplant their favorite toadies everywhere.

 

[TheSolution]

Ayub Khan ran away from his post well before Pakistan - the man enforced the seed of racial discrimination against the Bengalis and then ran away citing “I wont be responsible for the destruction of Pakistan” when faced with the consequences.

All military dictators have done more damage to Pakistan and worst of all to the merit and accountability within the military itself. Because no brilliant and accomplished officer will circumvent civilian rule - only mediocre sycophants seek to rule by force and then supplant their favorite toadies everywhere.

What did Ayub Khan say about Bengalis?

Was that not Yahya Khan?

 

[Crimson Blue]

Because no brilliant and accomplished officer will circumvent civilian rule -

That is only part of story. Whenever Generals had a chance, they promoted forward very low life and vile creatures to be politicians/leaders and then tried to convince awam that politician cannot manage the affairs of state.

Just listen to this clip of Mujib (a leader without blessings of PMA graduates). He could express himself confidently in English unlike Sharif/Zaradeis incubated by Junta as leaders.

 

[Bossman]

.
You are light on Pakistan history.
Ayub was bona-fide coward.
No one even have to point out what opportunity Pakistan missed in 1962 because of sell out coward leadership. They just reoccupoy Pakistan again and again.
1965 was an attempt to clear the stain, but he again sold out. And 1971 was a revenge on Pakistan.
Pakistan History is splattered with treachery and cowardice of military.
This Army is bred to conquer Pakistan only and humiliate and kill Pakistanis only because they still serve Lord Clive.

I think you are either a child, an Indian or someone with serious mental health issues.

BTW what is the bravest thing you have done other than punching a key board.

 

[imadul]

I think you are either a child, an Indian or someone with serious mental health issues.

Ok, good one.

Man I don't know what you're babbling on about, I think you're rewriting history because of your youthiya disease

Thank you, Sir.

 

[Crimson Blue]

Back in December 1964 , a story was published in Times about the political situation of Pakistan. This story has also been covered in this post on PDF before. Some one has also posted the text of story on following web site:

When Ayub Khan Accused Fatima Jinnah Of Being An Indian And American Agent

Here is an excerpt from this story: Countering Miss Jinnah’s repeated charge that he had been unable to restrain the U.S. from helping Pakistan’s No. 1 adversary, India, he set out to portray her as pro-Indian and pro-American. Ayub’s campaign, in fact, was turning increasingly anti-American.
So as per declaration of Generals of Pakistan, Fatima Jinnah was the first American and Indian agent in Pakistan, even before Sheikh Mujib was declared as such.

 

[Crimson Blue]

Here a traitor Bengali share her thoughts about another traitor of Chowkidars:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1623067128579387409

 

[Crimson Blue]

As anyone would expect, Pakistani news media was under the influence of Military Junta and that's how they reported results of 1970 elections. as they were instructed to:

Win of Mujib: Forceful occupation of assembly seats.

Loss of Bhutto: Being very popular, he commanded majority in West Pakistan in assembly elections.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1627352326095663104