What's new

Copy copy copy!!!

Indians especially south Indians have the sharpest phenotype on the planet.....North Indian and Pakistanis are rather blunt with smaller eyes..large and long nose thin lips and long face.
rekha-saree.jpg

Both Pakistanis and Northwest Indians are pretty much Caucasoid with the sharp features, whereas most of Indians are more mixed between Caucasoid and Australoid, even some Mongoloid in the Eastern part.
 
.
Indians especially south Indians have the sharpest phenotype on the planet.....North Indian and Pakistanis are rather blunt with smaller eyes..large and long nose thin lips and long face.
rekha-saree.jpg

LOL. Whtever you say :rofl:
 
.
.
:lol: You can't really, two of them belong to northern India yes, one is from western India, one is from East.

Yeah, i was tending to generalize a bit. Just because they have the light and sharp features, it doesn't necessarily mean they are from the Northwest India.
 
.
Yeah, i was tending to generalize a bit. Just because they have the light and sharp features, it doesn't necessarily mean they are from the Northwest India.

There is not much difference between an average Indian and an average Pakistani, as far as I have noticed anyways. But the extremes of each country, yes they do look quite different. You will get eastern euro looking Pakistanis and Indians with australoid features at each extreme. Everyone else is sorta in between those two extremes.
 
.
There is not much difference between an average Indian and an average Pakistani, as far as I have noticed anyways. But the extremes of each country, yes they do look quite different. You will get eastern euro looking Pakistanis and Indians with australoid features at each extreme. Everyone else is sorta in between those two extremes.

Is this guy Indian Brahmin? I find his Caucasoid features are extremely sharp, more than most White Europeans.

hemaboys3aw_small1.jpg
 
.
Is this guy Indian Brahmin? I find his Caucasoid features are extremely sharp, more than most White Europeans.

hemaboys3aw_small1.jpg

Once again you can't say just by looking at someone what caste he belongs to. Yes if you tell me his name I might be able to. I am a Brahmin myself, and no I don't look like that person in your post.:lol:. Tell you what, go look at the thread where forumers were posting their photos, tell me if you see much difference between Indians and Pakistanis.
 
.
Once again you can't say just by looking at someone what caste he belongs to. Yes if you tell me his name I might be able to. I am a Brahmin myself, and no I don't look like that person in your post.:lol:. Tell you what, go look at the thread where forumers were posting their photos, tell me if you see much difference between Indians and Pakistanis.

There are many overlaps, but in general, Pakistanis are lighter on average.
 
.
There are more Punjabis in Pakistan both percentage-wise and number-wise so why are you Indians claiming Punjabi when only 3% of your population speak Punjabi.

Because Punjabi is closer to Sanskrit and Hindi than to Arabic.
 
.
There are many overlaps, but in general, Pakistanis are lighter on average.

Yes without a doubt, percentage wise though:P otherwise there are just as many pale people in India as in Pakistan, if not more:lol: Basically on an average the people west of the Indus river look more akin to Afghans and Iranians, and the ones to the east of Indus and North Indians you couldn't tell the two apart in most of the cases.
 
. .
Yes without a doubt, percentage wise though:P otherwise there are just as many pale people in India as in Pakistan, if not more:lol: Basically on an average the people west of the Indus river look more akin to Afghans and Iranians, and the ones to the east of Indus and North Indians you couldn't tell the two apart in most of the cases.

Benazir Bhutto was a half Iranian, i can even see some affiliation with Iran even wihout knowing her background.
 
.
Even Urdu and Pali are very close to Sanskrit and Hindi, but what's the point?

It is all cultural. To us, all Chinese look practically the same but I am sure you can tell the difference. Heck, most Indians will not be able to tell the difference between Chinese and Japanese either - although the difference is quite easy to tell.
 
.
It is all cultural. To us, all Chinese look practically the same but I am sure you can tell the difference. Heck, most Indians will not be able to tell the difference between Chinese and Japanese either - although the difference is quite easy to tell.

Some Japanese have the overlapped Chinese phenotypes, even i can't tell them apart sometimes.

But a stereotyped Japanese face versus a stereotyped Chinese face is quite easy to tell.

BTW, i can't distinguish the South Asian languages by myself, but i am sure they are all different, but still closely related enough.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom