What's new

Conspiracy theorists claim 1972 photo from Apollo 17 mission proves moon landing was fake SHARE TWEE

Humans have been on the moon but not in 1979 like NASA claims.

The whole thing was propaganda BS in the cold war against the soviets, the landing craft looks like some kids science project, that gold foil badly wrapped around the feet everything about it looks like it a cheap bit of metal that wouldnt hack the motorway winds let alone end up all the way on the moon.
 
.
There was a claim as to why the american flag is waving in pics with no wind on moon, that query was cleared up in a tv series i watched in which they clearly explained that flags were starched to present a waving effect n by the way that tv series was way before these theories emerged..they really went to the moon, get over it.
 
.
for all the fake beliver... it is long proven that they were realy on the moon and that all still beliving it was fake are just dumb ignorants...

cl-mond1-DW-Wissenschaft-NICE-jpg.jpg


cl-mond3-DW-Wissenschaft-Mond-jpg.jpg


I say any one following the governments narrative and not questioning it until proven beyond doubt is a dumb zombie....exactly what they want the humans to be

295bf0853800ec294c7e47e4c543cf8e--blue-pill-conspiracy.jpg
 
.
moon landing wasnt fake all conspiracy theories are waste of time
 
. .
I'm sorry to say but you are a complete moron.


dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif


I know it is hard to imagine this is an actual NASA picture released recently that shows you how the earth / moon look like infront of each other.

NASA was forced to release this image after China landed on moon


What does this proofs?

a) Earth is drastically bigger then moon
b) So when you are standing on surface of earth you should see a gigantic view of earth as confirmed by Chinese

This is image released by Chinese Jade Rabbit , explorer
_90668630_ea088c90jw1f6dhutqtktj21hc0u0dyb.jpg




So all of those Apollo fake pictures , which showed earth to be itcy bitcy ball tiny ball are clearly fake


This is obviously fake
main-qimg-6bcc8110f32ba957fdcdc5f245cf90c7-c



FlatEarthIgnorantMeme.jpg



You know why they made the error because in 1968 , the director who filimed Space Odyssy 2001 , assumed the size of earth to be small

Movie picture released few years before moon landing
1969_view_facts_2001_space_odyssey.jpg




Photography 101
When sun is behind you , all the details become dark on your intended photo target
9.jpg


However on moon with fake lights you can still see details on dark side
18mlpha66cr70jpg.jpg


This behavior only was discovered now as ameture CGI artist work with multiple source of light now in CGI


Comical Assumption:
A simple fighter jets is tested 100-200 times with flight tests and landing and all of it has to pass 100% before a fighter jet is approved

For the Moon landing , all the test flights Neil Armstrong did "failed" the vehicle was unstable and dangerous as if the tilt was too extreme there was no recovery mechanism

So fearing Russians, americans send a un-tested landing vehicle, and it was never successfully landed on earth and then pilot did a "LUKE SKYWALKER" force is strong with you thing while landing and not only it landed it launched back up perfectly


Sure is shiny ... with all the lunar dust that must have been moved up some of it should have landed on this shiny specimen

4-158-AS11-LM-footpad.jpg


Every one gets some dust on the shoes
main.php
 
Last edited:
.
Hitler escape to Moon, and NASA shuttle was blown up by the Nazi's .. i am dead serious :drag:

I always assumed the NASA space shuttle program was nothing more than an elaborate hologram.

That and the fact that the Moon is partly made of cheese. At least some of the Interior sections anyway
 
.
I always assumed the NASA space shuttle program was nothing more than an elaborate hologram.

That and the fact that the Moon is partly made of cheese. At least some of the Interior sections anyway

Even Bhutto's in Pakistan using Hologram for speeches , so i would assume NASA will be using much advance version of it, working hard of Windows 98 :P

i cant argue, maybe dark side of the moon is made up of cheese , or just smell cheesy ..either way its a delicious conspiracy :D
 
.
Of-course.

9/11 is an inside job
Moon Landings are FAKE
Earth is FLAT (https://www.livescience.com/60972-flat-earthers-first-conference.html?utm_source=notification)

Upcoming:

US is FAKE
Dinosaurs are FAKE
Jesus Christ is a myth
Sun revolves around Earth
GOD is FAKE
GOG and MAGOG are carnivorous creatures lurking beneath the Great Wall of China

dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif


I know it is hard to imagine this is an actual NASA picture released recently that shows you how the earth / moon look like infront of each other.

NASA was forced to release this image after China landed on moon


What does this proofs?

a) Earth is drastically bigger then moon
b) So when you are standing on surface of earth you should see a gigantic view of earth as confirmed by Chinese

This is image released by Chinese Jade Rabbit , explorer
_90668630_ea088c90jw1f6dhutqtktj21hc0u0dyb.jpg




So all of those Apollo fake pictures , which showed earth to be itcy bitcy ball tiny ball are clearly fake


This is obviously fake
main-qimg-6bcc8110f32ba957fdcdc5f245cf90c7-c



FlatEarthIgnorantMeme.jpg



You know why they made the error because in 1968 , the director who filimed Space Odyssy 2001 , assumed the size of earth to be small

Movie picture released few years before moon landing
1969_view_facts_2001_space_odyssey.jpg




Photography 101
When sun is behind you , all the details become dark on your intended photo target
9.jpg


However on moon with fake lights you can still see details on dark side
18mlpha66cr70jpg.jpg


This behavior only was discovered now as ameture CGI artist work with multiple source of light now in CGI


Comical Assumption:
A simple fighter jets is tested 100-200 times with flight tests and landing and all of it has to pass 100% before a fighter jet is approved

For the Moon landing , all the test flights Neil Armstrong did "failed" the vehicle was unstable and dangerous as if the tilt was too extreme there was no recovery mechanism

So fearing Russians, americans send a untested landing , and it was never successfully landing and the did a "LUKE SKYWALKER" fore is strong with you thing while landing
and not only it landed it launched back up perfectly


Sure is shiny ... with all the lunar dust that must have been moved up some of it should have landed on this shiny specimen

4-158-AS11-LM-footpad.jpg


Every one gets some dust on the shoes
main.php
Your argument doesn't prove anything.

Following are genuine photos:

Photo taken by Lunar Orbiter I in 1966: https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_623.html

Photo taken during the first manned mission to moon in 1968: https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1249.html

Photo taken by Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2017: https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/lro-earthrise-2015

How an object appear in a photo, depends upon the angle of the shot and the capabilities of the camera involved. Modern-era cameras have powerful zooming and image manipulation capabilities.

Distance between Earth and Moon is about 384,000 KM on average:

663248a327766e571669025f847a48cf.jpg


If a human will look at Earth from the surface of moon, the latter object won't appear massive to naked eye.

Sun is a lot bigger than Earth but it does not appear massive to naked eye from the surface of Earth. Learn more from here: https://www.windows2universe.org/sun/sun_size_distance.html

Please apply common sense.
 
Last edited:
.
This is common sense , this is an official image relased by Jade rabbit , on it's twitter site
the lander taking picture of itself with earth

_90668630_ea088c90jw1f6dhutqtktj21hc0u0dyb.jpg


:pakistan::china:

This 1 image aline debunks apollo mission as they always showed ths size of earth incorrectly in their images


Further clues:

> Neil Armstrong gave only 2 interviews about the mission only 2 inteviews all his life till he died and before he died he told in a public speach that it is up to the new generation to lift the veil of the truth w.r.t moon. :)



Poor guy hoaxed the mission and then hid in his home till he died away from TV questions about mission fearing he will make mistakes in interviews and people will figure it out


And lets examine Mr Armstrong struggle to explain his trip some serious difficulty hiding things
 
Last edited:
. .
This is common sense , this is an official image relased by Jade rabbit , on it's twitter site
the lander taking picture of itself with earth

_90668630_ea088c90jw1f6dhutqtktj21hc0u0dyb.jpg


:pakistan::china:

This 1 image aline debunks apollo mission as they always showed ths size of earth incorrectly in their images
I am sorry but where is the proof of this image being authentic? Earth is definitely not that close to moon in reality.

I have posted an image in my previous response which demonstrate the actual distance between the moon and the Earth. Did you even bother to check it?

The images that the Chinese sources have officially released are accessible in the following links:

http://planetary.s3.amazonaws.com/data/change3/pcam.html

http://planetary.s3.amazonaws.com/data/change3/tcam.html

Where is the Earth in the official images?

Further clues:
> Neil Armstrong gave only 2 interviews about the mission only 2 inteviews all his life till he died and before he died he told in a public speach that it is up to the new generation to lift the veil of the truth w.r.t moon. :)



Poor guy hoaxed the mission and then hid in his home till he died away from TV questions about mission fearing he will make mistakes in interviews and people will figure it out


And lets examine Mr Armstrong struggle to explain his trip some serious difficulty hiding things
Doesn't prove anything.

Concrete evidence of American manned mission to moon provided by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter recently: https://www.space.com/14874-apollo-11-landing-site-moon-photo.html

They also brought 'moon rocks' to Earth for further examination: https://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/
 
Last edited:
. .
logo.gif
MythBusters Episode 104: NASA Moon Landing
Premier Date: August 27, 2008

This episode was based on the urban legend/conspiracy theory which claims that NASA never landed men on the moon, and instead the achievement was intentionally faked for one reason or another.

One of the NASA photos is fake because the shadows of the rocks and lunar lander are not parallel.

BUSTED

The MythBusters built a small-scale replica of the lunar landing site based on the photograph, using reflective sand similar to that found on the Moon, and a single light to represent the Sun. Next, they took a photo which was exactly the same as the NASA photo, including the differing shadows. The MythBusters explained that the shadows were not parallel because of the way the light falls on the Moon’s natural topography.

One of the NASA photos is fake because Neil Armstrong can be clearly seen while in the shadow of the lunar lander.

BUSTED

To test this myth, the MythBusters built a large-scale replica of the landing site, allowing them to take a photo which was nearly identical to the original NASA photo. The MythBusters explained that Armstrong was visible because of ambient light being reflected off of the Moon’s surface.

A flag cannot flap in a vacuum.

BUSTED

The Build Team placed a replica of the American flag planted on the moon into a vacuum chamber at the Marshall Space Flight Center. They first tested at normal pressure and manipulated the flag. The momentum moved the flag around but the motion quickly dissipated. In vacuum conditions, manipulating the flag caused it to flap vigorously as if it were being blown by a breeze. This demonstrated that a flag could appear to wave in a vacuum, as the Apollo flag did.

A clear footprint cannot be made in vacuum because there is no moisture to hold its shape.

BUSTED

The Build Team first tested whether dry or wet sand made a more distinguishable footprint by stepping in them with an astronaut boot. It was clear that the wet footprint had more detail than the dry footprint. They then placed sand similar in composition to the Moon’s soil in a vacuum chamber and stepped on it with an astronaut boot, which made a clear print. The reason provided for this was that the unique composition of lunar soil allows it to behave differently than terrestrial soil.

The film of the astronauts moonwalking is actually film of the astronauts skipping in front of a high-framerate camera, slowing down the picture and giving the illusion they are on the Moon.

BUSTED

Adam donned a replica NASA spacesuit and mimicked the astronauts’ motions while being filmed by a slow motion camera. They also attached Adam to wires in order to mimic the Moon’s lower gravity. While comparing their new footage with the original footage, the MythBusters noted an initial similarity, but there were several small discrepancies attributable to filming in Earth’s gravity. In order to film in microgravity, the MythBusters boarded a Reduced Gravity Aircraft and filmed the exact same movements. Adam noted that the movements were more comfortable and more logical in microgravity, and their footage from the plane looked exactly like the original NASA film. The MythBusters concluded that the moon landing film is authentic.

The Apollo astronauts left behind special equipment on the Moon like reflectors that scientists can bounce lasers off of.

CONFIRMED

The MythBusters went to an observatory equipped with a high powered laser. They first fired at the bare lunar surface but did not detect the laser bouncing back. Then they pointed the laser at a reflector left behind by NASA and received a confirmed bounce.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom