Congressi Propaganda: Hindu Majority provinces and Muslim Majority provinces can't live together

[Echo_419]

Secondly if you support BJP n Modi by any mean they ensure u r labeled anti minority, hindu extremists, Rss agent n so on....
But on a scale of nationalist I wud prefer BJP than any other national party n the same time I am in not in blind love with BJP OR MODI..... wait for a while , elections results abt to cum in four state n will congress say to people of four state that they are also Rss agent who has given mandate to Bjp to rule........?

Yaar I am also not a die hard fan of BJP but what options do we have
A corrupt,Socialist
Congress govt which is just wasting money in useless schemes like FSB,NREGA or a unstable 3rd front
In which Mulyam has a chance of becoming PM
I mean come on man Mulayam
So only BJP remains
& when we say this they will start calling us
Anti minority RSS agents
Sali Congress choro Ki Jamaat hai

 

[utraash]

Yaar I am also not a die hard fan of BJP but what options do we have
A corrupt,Socialist
Congress govt which is just wasting money in useless schemes like FSB,NREGA or a unstable 3rd front
In which Mulyam has a chance of becoming PM
I mean come on man Mulayam
So only BJP remains
& when we say this they will start calling us
Anti minority RSS agents
Sali Congress choro Ki Jamaat hai

I met hardcore Khoongressi leader in Rajsthan he was also an idiot of no level..... so I know their blah blah scheme will go to helll after election...... I always try to be rational when it cums to politics but these dayz I jave observed immense frustration among Khoongress worker becoz they are seeing their defeat in modi hand...... Wat issue they got against modi is stalking........

 

[dray]

The Muslim demand to be treated as a seperate nation is much older than that. The pre-eminent Sunni theologian Shah Waliullah clearly articulated that in the 18th century itself. The 2NT is a direct derivative of that line of thinking.

Excellent! Please elaborate more on that. Here OP is focused on shifting the responsibility of partition to an Indian, a Congressi, preferably a Hindu Congressi. So the blame is shifting from Lala Lajpat Rai to Savarkar to Gandhiji....!!

 

[dray]

Dear @adwityagrata:

I blame the Muslim scholars in the AICC first. What was they doing by that time? For ordinary muslims anything in Arabic was a Godly lyrics from heaven because they did not understood a word of it.But this what was being fetched to them during 20's. An ordinary muslim did not know that what was happening in Turkey and Balkans was not a holy war but a pure political struggle.Muslim scholars of Congress failed to comprehend knowingly or unknowingly that they are driving Indian Muslims from a secular and liberal understanding of Islam towards a communal and more harder line of intolerance.

But is it the Khilafat Movement that had given rise to the hardline & intolerant Islam, or is it the existing Hardline & intolerant part of the Muslim community that fueled the movement? Religious intolerance was always a part of Islam from the very beginning, if you consider how it has grown.

 

[scorpionx]

But is it the Khilafat Movement that had given rise to the hardline & intolerant Islam, or is it the existing Hardline & intolerant part of the Muslim community that fueled the movement? Religious intolerance was always a part of Islam from the very beginning, if you consider how it has grown.

Somehow I am not able to receive the notifications so did not see post quote earlier.

This is a common misunderstanding in India that Islam came to this country with the invaders called Md.Bin Qashim in AD672. We often forget that the beginning of commercial intercourse between Arabs and Indians is lost in unknown historical antiquity.From Gujarat to the coast of Kerala, Arab traders came,some of them settled here and astonishingly they were largely accepted by the local Hindus. Islam began its journey through peaceful means from south to North wards.

With the invasion of Qasim,this journey was checked for some times. With Qasim,there came the Sufis whose cardinal belief was talif i kulub,the stringing of hearts. Hindus who were terrorized by the Muslim invasion suddenly found that these mussalmans want to befriend them.Those who were denied equal rights in Bramhinical society chose to accepting Islam as their faith,and some of them even bonded themselves with the Muslim Aristocratic families by marriage.1920's India was raged with Mopla riots.You can find a little bit about the origin of this word Mopla.

Qasims invasion,Ghazni's plunder nor the successive victories of other Muslim invaders did not owe the large scale conversion of Hindus but the extra ordinary social and religious amalgamation by the Sufis which spread Islam in this subcontinent. I know this variant of history won't be liked by many but this is how all these happened.

 

[bronxbull]

Indian Muslims converted for a multitude of reasons and sufis were active largely in punjab and north west.

South Indian muslims are mostly descendants of foriegn fathers n indian mothers and many converted again for various reasons including death threats too.

 

[adwityagrata]

Indian Muslims converted for a multitude of reasons and sufis were active largely in punjab and north west.

South Indian muslims are mostly descendants of foriegn fathers n indian mothers and many converted again for various reasons including death threats too.

There is NO evidence to show conversion due to Sufism but plenty of evidence that shows conversion due to coercion even in North India. Sufism is just a fig leaf to help some sidestep an uncomfortable past or history.