What's new

Complete Q & A (Twitter) session on India’s Cold Start Doctrine with Defencepk’s in-house Experts

Nothing new is there in your post except rephrasing the same stuff which I replied already. By the way what business is Tata doing with Pakistan? There is no product of tata in Pakistan and there is no chance for any of their products to be marketed in Pakistan as the latter will find better alternatives from China and elsewhere so as I said either one have to totally ignorant or misleading the people with lies.


Excellent!! but not just Israel, add india to the list. We will eliminate these two countries with any country tried to invade Pakistan.
India is a priority for us, i mentioned Israel because he was asking about how to deter america, america doesnt give a rats *** about what happena to india...
 
.
Nothing new is there in your post except rephrasing the same stuff which I replied already. By the way what business is Tata doing with Pakistan? There is no product of tata in Pakistan and there is no chance for any of their products to be marketed in Pakistan as the latter will find better alternatives from China and elsewhere so as I said either one have to totally ignorant or misleading the people with lies.

Tata is just and example that I gave, Mittel Steel was interested in acquiring Pakistan Steel Mills, when Mr. Shaukat Aziz was our PM.

There are many more example like that.

Lol, so from losing a 200 million market to Aatmi kuwat... That is what actually the impression world has for you guys. :-) ..
I rest my case of discussing economics :laughcry:

I think you have comprehension issues.

I said that previous wars happened because both nations were not nuclear capabable at that time.
Now both of them are , a full scale war will mean end for subcontinent for sure. Either Indian use the nuclear weapon or Pakistan uses it. No a plant will grow in this region for new century.

So yes Pakistan and India will not have full scale war, might be small border conflicts, or proxy wars but nothing more than that.
 
Last edited:
.
Why Nasr comes in multiple launcher when it's sole purpose is to nuke small area and it's range is also small?

So that if the enemy tries to act smart and spreads its soldiers of over a larger area, we kill all the pigs by rapid multiple strikes. We have not only countered their CSD, we also took care of their CSD-II, III etc..Pakistan Zindabad :pakistan:
 
.
One thing Indians underestimate is the capability of the Pakistani people's will and expertise in asymmetric warfare. If the Indians were to capture an area, they would not only have to deal with PA, but with the locals. Poor bhartis don't know that millions of houses in Punjab have illegally stashed military grade weapons. Also fertilizer is not a problem so IED's galore. It would be the biggest mistake India would ever make. Think taliban style insurgency with hundreds of insurgent groups that are better organized.

Also Mujahid Force Regiment is there to back the Army, but could also possibly be designated to lead such resistance fighters. Any territory IA may possibly gain will be instantly given up due to cost of war, so this dance and pony show called 'Cold Start' would be for nothing.
 
Last edited:
.
One thing Indians underestimate is the capability of the Pakistani people's will and expertise in asymmetric warfare. If the Indians were to capture an area, they would not only have to deal with PA, but with the locals. Poor bhartis don't know that millions of houses in Punjab have illegally stashed military grade weapons. Also fertilizer is not a problem so IED's galore. It would be the biggest mistake India would ever make. Think taliban style insurgency with hundreds of insurgent groups that are better organized.

Also Mujahid Force Regiment is there to back the Army, but could also possibly be designated to lead such resistance fighters. Any territory IA may possibly gain will be instantly given up due to cost of war, so this dance and pony show called 'Cold Start' would be for nothing.

Why your are under impression we willing want to keep your lands under our control.Even Mighty US found it difficult to control it for much longer.

Cold Start is more of Military Doctrine for rapid mobilization and gaining advantages so it can be used latter at negotiation table.No one is going for full fledged invasion .Time for invasion has long gone.

And if you still think we are going for invasion and capturing your land , there is simple way to deal with such asymmetric warfare , we will adopt Mongol Warfare Policy on captured land:partay:
 
.
Why your are under impression we willing want to keep your lands under our control.Even Mighty US found it difficult to control it for much longer.

Cold Start is more of Military Doctrine for rapid mobilization and gaining advantages so it can be used latter at negotiation table.No one is going for full fledged invasion .Time for invasion has long gone.

And if you still think we are going for invasion and capturing your land , there is simple way to deal with such asymmetric warfare , we will adopt Mongol Warfare Policy on captured land:partay:

If aunty had balls, she'd be an uncle. :lol:
 
.
After reading all the comments from the so called PDF experts and other Pakistani members, I could one thing repeated over again and again "India cannot afford a full fledged war with Pakistan", while I fully agree with that, does it mean that Pakistan can afford a full fledged war with anyone, let alone India ???? LOL :)
 
.
After reading all the comments from the so called PDF experts and other Pakistani members, I could one thing repeated over again and again "India cannot afford a full fledged war with Pakistan", while I fully agree with that, does it mean that Pakistan can afford a full fledged war with anyone, let alone India ???? LOL :)
Dude no one said that Pakistan can afford a full fledged war.
 
. .
Why your are under impression we willing want to keep your lands under our control.Even Mighty US found it difficult to control it for much longer.

Cold Start is more of Military Doctrine for rapid mobilization and gaining advantages so it can be used latter at negotiation table.No one is going for full fledged invasion .Time for invasion has long gone.

And if you still think we are going for invasion and capturing your land , there is simple way to deal with such asymmetric warfare , we will adopt Mongol Warfare Policy on captured land:partay:
So finally you acknowledge that our ancestors (Mughals) did a remarkable job by ruling over entire india for ~ 6 centuries ?
 
.
So finally you acknowledge that our ancestors (Mughals) did a remarkable job by ruling over entire india for ~ 6 centuries ?
Im not sure its comprehension issue or eyesight..Read again its just hypothesis and more importantly i said Mongols not Mughals
 
.
India's defense budget is $56 billion to Pakistan's $8 billion. India is getting cutting edge weapons from across the world, while Pakistan has only China to go. Indian economy is 8.5 time larger than Pakistan. The disparity is just starting to grow between India and Pakistan and will widen further. All I see is Pakistan trying to defends its territory against offence India. For all the NASRs and Tactical nukes, excepts for its strategic nukes, Pakistan has no answers to India's overwhelming military superiority.
 
.
After reading all the comments from the so called PDF experts and other Pakistani members, I could one thing repeated over again and again "India cannot afford a full fledged war with Pakistan", while I fully agree with that, does it mean that Pakistan can afford a full fledged war with anyone, let alone India ???? LOL :)
Mate!!! war is not about affordability. It is not an economic proposition. Both countries cannot afford; neither India nor Pakistan. There are very few countries in the world that benefit from war and India and Pakistan are definitely not one of those. But even those countries cannot afford a direct confrontation with any nuclear power, we recently saw how uncle sam huffed and puffed about NK but eventually it realises that dialogues are the only option and demands NK should return to the peace talk etc.

However wars are fought for reasons other than economic development.
 
Last edited:
. .
@war&peace

What is the nuclear blast yield of Ra'ad and Babur?

It is difficult to say firstly because I don't know about it secondly even if I knew, I may not share it on this forum but it would be much bigger than NASR and also different because NASR has a specialised device that increases the amount of radiations (neutrons) while both Ra'ad and Babur can carry both conventional and nuclear warheads.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom